IBOV 182,377.03 ▼ 0.60% IPSA 11,205.07 ▼ 0.46% IPC MEX 64,992.23 ▲ 1.13% MERVAL 2,845,157 ▼ 1.68% COLCAP 2,585.25 ▲ 0.02% BVL PERÚ 60,698.35 ▼ 1.31% USD/BRL5.22▲ 0.72% USD/MXN17.84▲ 0.91% USD/CLP967.69▲ 0.64% USD/COP3,359▲ 2.14% USD/PEN3.44▲ 1.45% USD/ARS1,525▼ 0.02% USD/UYU40.39▲ 0.44% USD/PYG5,843▼ 0.46% USD/BOB11.98▼ 1.56% USD/DOP59.28▼ 0.02% USD/CRC450.38▼ 0.11% USD/GTQ7.63▼ 0.07% USD/HNL26.86▲ 0.03% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES854.86▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.72▼ 0.73% EUR/BRL5.94▲ 0.55% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 182,377.03 ▼ 0.60% IPSA 11,205.07 ▼ 0.46% IPC MEX 64,992.23 ▲ 1.13% MERVAL 2,845,157 ▼ 1.68% COLCAP 2,585.25 ▲ 0.02% BVL PERÚ 60,698.35 ▼ 1.31% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Monday, September 28, 2026

Chile Latin America

Chile’s Environmental Judges Step Aside in Barrick Mine Case After Leak

By · September 28, 2026 · 3 min read

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Brazil votes Sunday. The courts are deciding.”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

CHILE · MINING AND THE COURTS

Key Facts

  • —The country Chile, the world’s largest copper producer, has specialised environmental courts that hear challenges to mining and energy permits.
  • —Why it matters The case concerns El Alto, a US$35 million Barrick Gold drilling project on the site of Pascua Lama, a gold mine Chile ordered permanently closed in 2018.
  • —What happened On Wednesday 23 September the court’s website announced a ruling against the project’s opponents, then removed it. On 24 September all three judges recused themselves.
  • —Who is involved Diaguita indigenous communities and Alto del Carmen residents challenging the permit, and Compañía Minera Nevada, the Barrick subsidiary behind El Alto.
  • —What it means for you The cases move to a second court in Santiago. For mining investors, it adds delay and scrutiny to one of Chile’s most contested sites.
  • —Still open Who published the note, whether the ruling had actually been taken, and how the Santiago court will decide.

All three judges of Chile’s First Environmental Tribunal have stepped aside from one of the country’s most contested mining cases. The Antofagasta-based court hears challenges to environmental permits in northern Chile.

Free daily brief — no card needed
Get every Chile story in one morning email
We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.

They withdrew after the court’s own website announced a decision missing from the case file. BioBioChile, which broke the story, called it unprecedented.

Mining installations and water ponds in a high Andean valley in Chile
An aerial view of mining installations and water ponds in a high Andean valley, as published in The Rio Times’ 2022 report on the Pascua Lama closure.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

A ruling posted before it was filed

On the afternoon of Wednesday 23 September, the tribunal’s website said it had rejected requests to suspend the project’s environmental permit. According to BioBioChile, no resolution backing that note was in the case file.

The note was removed hours later, El Desconcierto and Nueva Minería reported. On 24 September the court’s president, Alamiro Alfaro Zepeda, and judges Sandra Álvarez Torres and Marcelo Hernández Rojas recused themselves.

All three cited the same legal ground: having already expressed a view on a pending question. Under Law 20.600, which created the environmental courts, the cases passed to the Second Environmental Tribunal in Santiago.

Asked by Nueva Minería, the tribunal declined to comment beyond the case file. It said it had tightened its rules on communicating decisions.

Why the El Alto project is contested

El Alto belongs to Compañía Minera Nevada, a Barrick Gold subsidiary. It plans 62 drill holes from 43 platforms at about 4,000 metres in the Atacama region. It will cost US$35 million.

The ground is that of Pascua Lama, a Barrick gold project halted in 2013 over water discharges and glacier monitoring failures. Chile’s environmental regulator ordered it permanently closed in 2018 (background: Barrick Eyes Copper in Chile After Pascua Lama Closure).

Diaguita indigenous communities and local residents have filed several challenges to El Alto’s permit, El Desconcierto reported. BioBioChile reported that they see it as a new attempt to work a site that must close.

Questions over the court official

The challengers also question the case rapporteur, the court official who prepares the file, Álvaro Funes Palacios. BioBioChile reported that he spent five years as head of legal affairs at Minera Zaldívar, which Barrick half-owns.

Bruno Barrientos, a lawyer for the Diaguita Alta Cordillera community, questioned his assignment to the case. El Desconcierto stressed that the documents it reviewed establish no wrongdoing or proven conflict of interest.

What Is Not Yet Known

It is not known who posted the note, or whether the judges had actually reached that decision.

It is also unclear when the Santiago court will rule on the requests to suspend the permit. Barrick had not commented publicly in the coverage so far.

BioBioChile also reported that the Santiago court’s president, Marcela Godoy, is married to Minera Zaldívar’s legal manager. El Desconcierto noted that this does not in itself disqualify her.

Sources: BioBioChile (via Fundación Terram), 27 September 2026, El Desconcierto, 28 September 2026, Nueva Minería y Energía, El Ciudadano, 27 September 2026, Diario y Radio Universidad de Chile, 27 September 2026. Earlier coverage: Barrick Gold’s epilogue in Chile and complications in the Pascua Lama closure.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.