180 Missing Documents: Brazil’s Chief Justice Sets a 24-Hour Banco Master Deadline
BRAZIL · SUPREME COURT
Key Facts
- —The order Court president Edson Fachin gave Justice André Mendonça 24 hours to lift secrecy on every linked procedure.
- —The method Mendonça must copy the full files to a hard drive and send them to all justices’ chambers.
- —The gap The court’s own system indexes 4,514 documents in the case and displays 4,334 of them.
- —The accusation Alexandre de Moraes told Fachin in writing that the disclosure so far shielded a named political group.
- —The catch Secrecy came down on Thursday. By Friday the justices could not agree on what was still sealed.
- —What is next A plenary session set for Tuesday decides whether evidence gathered against Moraes survives.
The court says 4,514 documents are indexed and 4,334 are visible. The argument over the missing 180 has become an argument over the court itself.
Brazil’s Supreme Court gave one of its own justices 24 hours on Friday to hand over every Banco Master file.
The order came from court president Edson Fachin. Its target was Justice André Mendonça, who manages the case.
A day earlier the same court had announced that secrecy was coming down. By Friday its members were arguing about how much of it actually had.
The Number at the Centre of It
The dispute has a figure attached. The court’s digital system indexes 4,514 documents in the case and displays 4,334 of them.
That leaves 180 unaccounted for. Justice Alexandre de Moraes pointed at the gap; Mendonça said it proves nothing.
Gazeta do Povo reported his explanation on Friday. He attributed the mismatch to technical and normative reasons.
Some files stay sealed, he said, to protect banking and tax data. The people concerned are still under investigation.
His own formulation was flat. Every piece effectively available, he said, had been duly made public.
What Fachin Ordered
Fachin acted on a request from the prosecutor general’s office. Conjur reported that the request asked for disclosure of all linked material, “sem exceção” — without exception.
Moraes and Justice Cristiano Zanin had pressed for fuller access in parallel. Zanin’s request was narrower, covering the full contents extracted from the banker’s phone.
The order is unusually physical. Mendonça was told to copy the complete files onto a hard drive.
He must deliver them to the presidency and to every justice’s chambers. The decision was issued in Petition 16.704.
Conjur listed the material by docket number. It includes Petition 15.556, Inquiry 5.026, Inquiry 5.035, a constitutional complaint and eleven further petitions.
One exemption survives. Investigative steps whose disclosure would still damage police work may stay sealed, CNN Brasil reported.
The Accusation Behind the Deadline
The deadline exists because Moraes told Fachin the earlier disclosure had been curated. He put it in a new written note on Friday, reiterating an earlier one.
O Globo published the passage. Moraes wrote of a “levantamento seletivo e direcionado” of secrecy by Mendonça.
It was carried out, he said, in ostensive protection of a particular political group. He called it a repeat of illegal steering of plea deals and of investigative orders against predetermined targets.
The wording is exceptional even for this court. One sitting justice is accusing another, in writing, of running a case to shield politicians.
Gilmar Mendes Widens It
A third justice then moved. Gilmar Mendes asked Fachin on Friday to take personal charge of the case.
That case, Petition 16.662, concerns a federal police report on messages between Moraes and the banker Daniel Vorcaro. Mendes also asked that the request to investigate Mendonça be folded into it.
His stated reason was procedural chaos. He warned of “decisões inconciliáveis e desordem procedimental” if the strands stayed apart.
Poder360 reported his blunter conclusion. There is no way, he argued, for the court to judge the Moraes matter on Tuesday.
What Tuesday Actually Decides
The plenary is scheduled for Tuesday, 15 September, with Mendonça as rapporteur. CNN Brasil set out its three questions.
The first is whether Mendonça’s order to deepen the analysis of Vorcaro’s phone data was lawful. The second is whether the police material produced from it can be used at all.
The third is what happens to the part concerning Moraes. It can either support an investigation into him or be archived.
The prosecutor general’s office has asked the court to annul the procedure outright. Its argument is that one justice cannot investigate another without notice to the presidency or the full bench.
Who Vorcaro Is
Daniel Vorcaro controls Banco Master, a mid-sized Brazilian lender. He took over the former Banco Máxima and renamed it in 2021.
Federal police arrested him on 4 March in the third phase of an operation called Compliance Zero. Agência Brasil reported the arrest that day.
He has been in custody since. His defence has denied corruption.
The Banco Master case matters beyond banking because of who appears in the files. Police reports on contacts between Vorcaro and a sitting justice are what turned a fraud inquiry into a constitutional one.
A Court of Ten
Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court has eleven seats. Only ten are occupied.
Luís Roberto Barroso retired in October 2025. The Senate rejected the government’s nominee for his seat, Jorge Messias, on 29 April 2026 by 42 votes to 34.
So ten justices will vote on Tuesday. Two of them are the subjects of the material in dispute.
The past ten days have also seen contradictory orders about who runs the federal police. On 9 September Fachin removed Moraes from the fake-news inquiry he had led since 2019 and took it himself.
Each of those steps was taken by a single justice or by the presidency. None was taken by the full bench, which is the institutional risk in plain sight.
Whether the hard drive arrives complete is now the test. Nobody outside the court can verify it, which is why the argument became public at all.
More: Brazil news in English, every day from The Rio Times.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Banco Master case?
It is a federal police fraud investigation into a Brazilian lender and its controlling shareholder, Daniel Vorcaro. Files in the case also contain police reports on a Supreme Court justice, which is how it became a constitutional dispute.
Who is André Mendonça?
He is a justice of Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court and the rapporteur of the case, meaning the justice who manages the file. He was appointed to the court in 2021.
What did Fachin actually order?
He ordered Mendonça to lift secrecy on all linked procedures within 24 hours and to deliver complete copies on a hard drive to every justice’s chambers. Only steps that would damage live police work may stay sealed.
Why does the court have ten justices instead of eleven?
One seat has been vacant since Luís Roberto Barroso retired in October 2025. The Senate rejected the nominee put forward for it, Jorge Messias, in April 2026.
Sources: Migalhas, Conjur, Gazeta do Povo, O Globo, G1, Poder360, CNN Brasil, UOL, Metrópoles, Agência Brasil, Agência Senado, Veja, InfoMoney.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
In depth
Read More from The Rio Times