IBOV 190,100.03 ▲ 1.55% IPSA 10,931.11 ▲ 0.21% IPC MEX 63,828.60 ▼ 0.60% MERVAL 2,781,181 ▲ 0.81% COLCAP 2,514.68 ▼ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 59,751.67 ▲ 0.19% USD/BRL5.21▼ 0.19% USD/MXN18.16▼ 0.72% USD/CLP988.90▲ 0.28% USD/COP3,262▼ 1.53% USD/PEN3.43▼ 0.70% USD/ARS1,524▼ 0.04% USD/UYU40.46▲ 3.55% USD/PYG5,821▲ 2.69% USD/BOB11.93▲ 2.09% USD/DOP59.79▲ 0.49% USD/CRC456.38▲ 3.02% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.14% USD/HNL26.86▲ 3.19% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.63% USD/VES864.39▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.69▲ 1.67% EUR/BRL5.87▲ 0.03% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 190,100.03 ▲ 1.55% IPSA 10,931.11 ▲ 0.21% IPC MEX 63,828.60 ▼ 0.60% MERVAL 2,781,181 ▲ 0.81% COLCAP 2,514.68 ▼ 0.61% BVL PERÚ 59,751.67 ▲ 0.19% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Friday, October 2, 2026

Avianca vs. Aerocivil: is it the end of the conflict for Colombia’s skies?

By · May 16, 2023 · 4 min read

After months of quarrels with the Colombian government, the airline Avianca desisted from absorbing the ‘low cost’ firm Viva, accusing the aeronautical authority of making the operation “unviable”.

Bogotá, for its part, assures that the Colombian air market “is robust and solid”.

The disagreements between the Colombian government and Avianca Airlines seem to have reached a climax, with the announcement by the company that it has decided not to take over the low-cost airline Viva Air.

One of the main disputes between Avianca and the Colombian government is the obligation to return frequencies
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The first Colombian airline’s intention to acquire its low-cost competitor had sparked a dispute with the Colombian Civil Aeronautics Authority (Aerocivil), which sought to prevent a monopoly in Colombian airspace.

“After nine months of having initiated the integration request process and after studying in detail Aerocivil’s resolution 873 of 2023: Avianca desists from the integration with Viva”, the airline stated in a communiqué issued on May 13.

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Brazil votes Sunday: Lula 45%, Flávio 40%, and the 50% line”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

In this way, Avianca publicly stated that it was interrupting the process it had tried to initiate in April 2022, when its shareholders had acquired the economic rights of Viva.

At that time, Avianca had announced its intention to form, together with Viva and Brazil’s Gol, a new conglomerate called Abra, which would seek to dispute the regional leadership of the Latam group.

However, the plan began to crumble months later when Aerocivil – the country’s top aeronautical authority – suspended the merger, claiming that the union of Avianca and Viva would concentrate 35% of Colombia’s air market, something prevented by free competition regulations in the South American country.

The news finally brought down Viva, which began to suspend flights in February and finally ceased operations.

The absence of the low-cost airline, which covered 40 domestic and 18 international destinations, forced the Colombian government to intercede to avoid chaos in air transport.

Thus, Aerocivil authorized the merger between Avianca and Viva at the end of March, although with some conditions.

In effect, the authorization obliged Avianca to maintain low-cost prices on Viva’s frequencies and that there be a price limit on routes without competition.

In addition, the authority required Avianca to return frequencies on the Bogota-Buenos Aires route, as the merger was “particularly impacted”.

Two months later, Avianca was surprised with a statement that after “studying in detail” the resolution, it found that “the Aerocivil’s conditions make the recovery of Viva impossible and could even affect Avianca’s stability”.

In this framework, Avianca questions the “little regulatory flexibility” of the resolution and points out that the requirements do not adjust “to Viva’s current reality”.

According to the company, “the conditions require Avianca to assume obligations, routes, and service and price level commitments that do not coincide with Viva’s remaining capacities after two months of suspension of operations”.

One of the main disputes between Avianca and the Colombian government is the obligation to return frequencies.

In its statement, the company assures that it returned more than 75% of Viva’s slots at Bogota’s El Dorado International Airport and more than 72% of the “premium slots,” but, even so, “the authority demanded the return of several slots that would not allow Viva to base a single aircraft at the country’s main airport in an efficient manner”.

For Avianca, these conditions contradict Viva’s obligations to maintain connectivity and make the merger operation “economically unviable”.

Similarly, Viva also questioned the requirements imposed by the Colombian aeronautical authority, pointing out that the outcome “destroys a company and all the value around it due to the lack of understanding of the business”.

Contrary to the complaints of Avianca and Viva, Aerocivil responded by emphasizing that “the Colombian air transport market is robust and solid” and assuring that “the data show a resilient demand that attracts airlines to supply the supply spaces ceded by Viva Air and thus continue to generate the dynamics that allows resuming the path of growth”.

In addition, the agency said it would ensure fair, attractive, and competitive conditions for investment, focused on the stability of the sector and maintaining the commitment to the social function of property, as required by the constitution.

In this regard, Aerocivil announced that it would strengthen Colombia’s aeronautical regulations and review its strategic plan to “protect the sector, promote connectivity, competitiveness and competition”.

The Colombian authority ratified that its efforts will be focused on “the people who were affected by the suspension of operations” of Viva through “user protection schemes”.

With information from Sputnik

News Colombia, English news Colombia, Avianca

Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief · Editorial standards · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.