IBOV 187,206.89 ▼ 0.56% IPSA 11,220.60 ▼ 0.16% IPC MEX 63,924.77 ▼ 0.28% MERVAL 3,098,898 ▼ 1.87% COLCAP 2,589.69 ▼ 1.41% BVL PERÚ 59,373.28 ▼ 0.32% USD/BRL5.13— 0.00% USD/MXN16.96▼ 0.01% USD/CLP941.13— 0.00% USD/COP3,077▼ 0.78% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.01% USD/ARS1,509— 0.00% USD/UYU40.26▲ 3.12% USD/PYG5,903▲ 3.35% USD/BOB11.98▼ 2.70% USD/DOP58.96▲ 0.56% USD/CRC447.55▲ 1.64% USD/GTQ7.63▲ 2.97% USD/HNL26.85▲ 3.13% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES830.41▼ 1.28% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.74▲ 2.35% EUR/BRL5.95▲ 0.25% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 187,206.89 ▼ 0.56% IPSA 11,220.60 ▼ 0.16% IPC MEX 63,924.77 ▼ 0.28% MERVAL 3,098,898 ▼ 1.87% COLCAP 2,589.69 ▼ 1.41% BVL PERÚ 59,373.28 ▼ 0.32% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Sunday, September 13, 2026

Africa Politics and Society

Zambia Charges an Opposition Presidential Candidate With Sedition Over an Election Claim

By · September 13, 2026 · 5 min read

Africa Intelligence

One email, every weekday morning. African markets, politics and business — filed from our newsroom in Rio.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Algeria cuts diplomatic ties with the UAE”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

Zambia · POLITICS

Key Facts

  • What happened Zambian police formally arrested Brian Mundubile and Makebi Zulu on 11 September 2026 at Kabwe Central Police Station and charged them with seditious practices under Section 57 of the Penal Code, Chapter 87.
  • Where they are held The two men were returned to Mukobeko Maximum Correctional Facility after the charges were filed.
  • The wider pattern Gina Romero, the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, who serves independently of the United Nations, said on 2 September that Zambian authorities had intensified arbitrary arrests and disproportionate charges, including sedition, against political opponents.
  • Earlier accusations Police had previously accused Mundubile and Zulu of treason, with allegations involving weapons and a suspected militia network.
  • Why it matters The case sits within a broader contest over democratic space, rule of law, and the state’s use of criminal law against opposition actors in post-election Zambia.

Zambian police charged Brian Mundubile and Makebi Zulu with seditious practices on 11 September 2026, adding a second charge alongside the treason case they already face, a charge that international bodies say is being used to silence dissent.

Zambia charges an opposition presidential candidate with sedition over an election claim
Zambia charges an opposition presidential candidate with sedition over an election claim
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Zambian police formally arrested Brian Mundubile and Makebi Zulu at Kabwe Central Police Station on 11 September 2026 and charged them with seditious practices under Section 57 of the Penal Code, Chapter 87. The two men were then returned to Mukobeko Maximum Correctional Facility, where they remain in custody.

The seditious practices charges against Mundubile and Makebi

The sedition charge marks a shift in the legal case against the two opposition figures. Earlier reports said police had initially accused them of treason, with allegations involving weapons and a suspected militia network.

The new charge under Section 57 of the Penal Code carries a different legal weight. It places Mundubile and Zulu inside a category of offences that human rights groups say has become a common tool against critics in Zambia.

Police have not released detailed evidence to support the seditious practices charges. The formal arrest at Kabwe Central Police Station came after the men were already in detention, deepening questions about the sequence of legal steps.

A post-election crackdown on opposition voices

Gina Romero, the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, who serves independently of the United Nations, said on 2 September that Zambian authorities had intensified arbitrary arrests and what it called disproportionate charges against political opponents. Sedition was among the charges the UN specifically named.

Amnesty International has also flagged a broader pattern in Zambia. The rights group says sedition and related security charges are being used against critics and opposition politicians.

That context places the Mundubile and Makebi case inside a wider national trend. Zambia is moving through a tense post-election period where domestic political control and security narratives are colliding.

A second charge on top of the treason case

The earlier treason accusations against Mundubile and Zulu were far more serious. Police had alleged a weapons link and a suspected militia network, claims that immediately raised the stakes.

The move to seditious practices charges could be read in different ways. Their lawyers say neither charge as described to them involves any act beyond the making of a statement. Police have not published a charge sheet. The treason case, in which Mundubile is charged alongside 16 others, has no trial date. Both men deny the allegations and neither has stood trial. A broader and more flexible statute.

Either way, the two men now face a charge that international observers say is being deployed with increasing frequency. The UN commentary suggests the case sits within a broader contest over democratic space and the rule of law.

International scrutiny and the rule of law

The United Nations has not named Mundubile and Zulu specifically in its early September statement. But its description of intensified arbitrary arrests and sedition charges matches the pattern of their case.

Amnesty International has gone further in separate reporting, documenting what it calls authoritarian practices in Zambia. The group has issued urgent actions calling for the release of detained opposition figures.

For investors and professionals watching Zambia, the legal environment matters. A state that uses criminal law against political opponents can create uncertainty far beyond the courtroom.

What the case means for Zambia’s political stability

Zambia has long presented itself as a stable democracy in Southern Africa. The post-election period is now testing that reputation.

The detention of opposition figures on sedition charges draws attention from donors, regional bodies and international markets. How the government handles the case will signal its tolerance for dissent.

The broader geopolitical angle is also visible. Zambia sits inside a region where competition for critical minerals and political influence is intensifying, a dynamic covered in Africa: The New Scramble.

What to watch next

The next legal step for Mundubile and Zulu will be a court appearance to answer the seditious practices charges. No date has been confirmed in the available reporting.

International bodies are likely to keep watching. The UN and Amnesty have both signalled that Zambia’s use of sedition charges against opposition figures is a live concern.

The government’s response to that scrutiny will shape how the case is understood. For now, the two men remain at Mukobeko Maximum Correctional Facility, and the legal process is only beginning.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are Brian Brian Mundubile and Makebi Zulu charged with in Zambia?

They were charged with seditious practices under Section 57 of the Penal Code, Chapter 87, after being formally arrested on 11 September 2026 at Kabwe Central Police Station.

Where are Mundubile and Zulu being held?

They were returned to Mukobeko Maximum Correctional Facility after the seditious practices charges were filed.

Why is the United Nations concerned about this case?

The UN said in early September that Zambian authorities had intensified arbitrary arrests and disproportionate charges, including sedition, against political opponents.

Connected Coverage

Sources

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.