Peru Asked Mexico to Drop the Visa. Two Weeks Ago They Were Not Speaking
Peru · TRADE
Key Facts
- —The visa At a bilateral meeting on 19 August, Peru formally asked Mexico to drop the visa requirement for Peruvian citizens. Deputy foreign minister Raquel Serur said Mexico would make the corresponding arrangements to evaluate it.
- —Why it is possible now Peru severed relations with Mexico in November 2025 over asylum for former prime minister Betssy Chávez. They were restored on 7 August 2026 after Peru granted her a safe-conduct.
- —How old the visa is Mexico suspended visa-free entry for Peruvians with effect from 6 May 2024, citing a rise in arrivals engaged in activities beyond tourism.
- —Hong Kong Peru ratified its free-trade agreement with Hong Kong on 15 July by supreme decree. Galarreta says it will enter into force this year.
- —The squid Lima hosted the first regional workshop on the giant squid on 18–19 August, convened by the Permanent Commission for the South Pacific with the industry body Calamasur and the FAO.
- —Why squid matters Peru accounts for more than half of world catches of giant squid, and the fishery supports tens of thousands of artisanal families.
Three small diplomatic moves in one week from a foreign ministry that has spent three years fighting instead of filing.
The Peru Mexico visa question is back on the table, and the reason it can be is that the two countries are speaking again at all. Peru formally asked Mexico on 19 August to drop the requirement it imposed on Peruvian travellers in 2024. Twelve days earlier, the two governments had no diplomatic relations.
How the Peru Mexico visa file reopened
The break was not gradual. Peru declared Mexico’s ambassador persona non grata in December 2022 after Mexico refused to recognise the government that replaced Pedro Castillo. Relations limped on until November 2025, when Mexico granted asylum to former prime minister Betssy Chávez and Peru severed them outright.
They were restored on 7 August 2026, after Peru granted Chávez a safe-conduct out of the country. President Claudia Sheinbaum announced the restoration. The bilateral meeting on 19 August was the first since, and the visa was on the table at it.
Mexico’s stated reason for the visa in 2024 was migration rather than politics: its foreign ministry pointed to a sharp rise in Peruvian nationals entering and then engaging in activities beyond tourism, with inconsistencies in documentation. The diplomatic freeze was the context, not the justification.
The requirement has cost Peruvians a great deal of ordinary convenience. Mexico is a major transit hub for Peruvian travellers heading to North America, a significant destination for Peruvian students and workers, and a large source of business travel in both directions. Serur’s answer — that Mexico will make the corresponding arrangements to evaluate the request — is diplomatic language for a process rather than a decision, and no date is attached.
Hong Kong, and what a small trade deal is for
The Hong Kong agreement is further along than it is usually described. Peru signed it in Lima in November 2024, during the APEC summit, and ratified it on 15 July 2026 by supreme decree 030-2026-RE. What remains is the exchange of notifications and an agreed date for entry into force. Galarreta said in his policy speech on 20 August that trade opening would remain a state policy and that this deal would take effect during 2026.
Hong Kong is not a large market for Peru in its own right. What it is, is a financial and logistics gateway, and Peruvian exporters — particularly in fruit, fishmeal and minerals — use it to reach the mainland Chinese market and to arrange trade finance.
The agreement matters less for the tariff lines it changes than for the services and investment provisions that come with it. Peru has spent close to two decades building a network of these deals, and trade policy is one of the few areas of continuity across governments that have agreed on almost nothing else.
The squid meeting is the sleeper
Lima hosted something on 18 and 19 August that had not happened before: a regional workshop bringing government officials, scientists, artisanal fishers and industry together on the giant squid, or pota, of the southeast Pacific. It was convened by the Permanent Commission for the South Pacific alongside Calamasur, the regional industry body, with the FAO taking part.
Be clear about what it was and was not. No treaty was signed, no roadmap adopted, no catch limit agreed. The agenda was the state of the stock, the gaps in the science, and what each country has learned from managing its own fleet. That is a working meeting, not an agreement.
It still matters, because the alternative has been failing. The last serious attempt at the regional fisheries body in March closed without effective measures, and the pressure on the stock comes from outside the region entirely: distant-water fleets, overwhelmingly Chinese-flagged, working the high seas just beyond the 200-mile limits in numbers that dwarf the local fleets.
Peru has the largest interest of anyone in getting this right. It accounts for more than half of global catches of a fishery that runs to a million tonnes a year worldwide, and that fishery feeds tens of thousands of artisanal families. Catches this year have already been hit by the coastal El Niño. A shared scientific baseline is the precondition for anything stronger later, and until this week the three coastal states did not have one.
What it adds up to
Three items, none of them individually large, all pointing the same way: a government trying to reopen relationships and finish unfinished business rather than start anything new.
For anyone living in Peru, the visa is the one with an immediate practical effect, and it is also the one entirely outside Peru’s control. Mexico will decide in its own time, and nothing about the 19 August meeting suggests that time is short.
For anyone exporting from Peru, the Hong Kong deal is now a question of paperwork rather than politics — watch for the entry-into-force date, which is when it starts to matter. And for the fishing sector, the Lima workshop is the first sign in years that the coastal states intend to work on this together rather than separately.
There is a pattern worth naming. Peru’s foreign policy spent three years consumed by recognition disputes and recalled ambassadors, and almost none of it was about trade. All three of this week’s items are administrative rather than ideological — a visa file, a ratification, a scientific working group. That is what a foreign ministry looks like when it has stopped fighting and started filing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Has Mexico dropped the visa requirement for Peruvians?
No. Peru formally asked Mexico to drop it at a bilateral meeting on 19 August 2026, and deputy foreign minister Raquel Serur said Mexico would make the corresponding arrangements to evaluate the request. The requirement, in force since 6 May 2024, still applies and no decision date has been given.
Is the Peru–Hong Kong trade agreement in force?
Not yet, but it is closer than it is usually described. Peru signed it in November 2024 and ratified it on 15 July 2026 by supreme decree 030-2026-RE. What remains is the exchange of notifications and an agreed entry-into-force date, which the government says will come during 2026.
Did Peru, Chile and Ecuador agree new rules on squid?
No. Lima hosted a regional workshop on 18–19 August 2026, convened by the Permanent Commission for the South Pacific with the industry body Calamasur and the FAO. It reviewed the state of the stock and the gaps in the science. No treaty, roadmap or catch limit was adopted.
Connected Coverage
Sources: Andina; Infobae; La República; Caretas; Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores del Perú; Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur; Embajada de México en el Perú.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
In depth
Read More from The Rio Times