A new IDB report quantifies the region’s deep productivity deficit and points to informality, skills mismatches, and weak investment as the core obstacles.
For anyone following Latin America’s economic trajectory, the latest Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) report delivers a sobering benchmark: Latin America’s productivity gap means the region needs almost four workers to produce what one US worker does, a structural drag that explains stagnant wages, fragile social safety nets, and persistent inequality across the region.
Key Facts
- Productivity ratio Latin America’s labour productivity is about 26% of the US level, requiring nearly four regional workers to match one US worker.
- Formality rate Only 46% of workers in the region hold formal jobs with social-security coverage.
- Slow progress Informality fell by just eight percentage points over two decades.
- Skills gap More than 40% of workers lack the basic literacy and numeracy skills required for their jobs.
- Structural causes Low investment in physical and technological capital, weak innovation, and human-capital gaps underpin the shortfall.
- Policy fixes The IDB recommends vocational training, stronger social protection, formal hiring incentives, and regulatory reform.
The scale of the gap
The IDB’s study, titled “Hacer que los mercados laborales funcionen” (“Making Labor Markets Work”), puts Latin America’s labour productivity at roughly 26% of the US level. That is not a cyclical dip but a long-run equilibrium shaped by decades of underinvestment and weak institutional incentives. The report, released in August 2026, frames this as a failure of labour markets to allocate talent and capital efficiently, with consequences for both output and worker well-being.
The gap is not uniform across sectors, but the aggregate figure is stark. It implies that a typical Latin American worker produces little more than a quarter of their US counterpart’s output. This disparity helps explain why the region’s middle classes remain vulnerable to shocks and why poverty reduction has slowed in recent years. The IDB stresses that closing even part of this gap would have outsized effects on living standards, but the path requires confronting uncomfortable structural realities.
Causes: informality, skills, and investment
The report identifies several interlocking causes. Chief among them is labour informality: only 46% of workers in Latin America and the Caribbean have formal jobs with social-security coverage. That means more than half of the workforce operates outside the protections and productivity-enhancing mechanisms of the formal economy, such as training, credit access, and legal recourse. The IDB notes that informality fell by only eight percentage points over 20 years, a glacial pace that suggests policy inertia rather than market forces.
Compounding this is a severe skills mismatch. The report finds that more than 40% of workers lack the basic literacy and numeracy skills needed for their jobs. This is not a fringe problem; it affects a large share of the employed population, limiting their ability to adopt new technologies or move into higher-value roles. On the investment side, the IDB points to chronically low spending on physical and technological capital, alongside weak innovation and an inefficient business environment marked by regulatory barriers, infrastructure deficiencies, and legal uncertainty. These factors discourage firms from upgrading equipment or expanding, trapping productivity at low levels.
What the IDB recommends
The IDB’s prescription is broad but concrete. It calls for expanding vocational and professional training programmes to close the skills gap, with a particular focus on workers already in the labour force rather than only new entrants. Strengthening social protection and pension systems is also central, but the bank is careful to link this to formalisation: benefits should be less dependent on job status, making formal hiring more attractive to both employers and workers.
Regulatory reform is the third pillar. The report argues that current rules often penalise formal employment, pushing firms and workers into informality. Simplifying registration, reducing red tape, and ensuring legal certainty for investors would help. The IDB also stresses that training and social protection should be designed to support labour mobility, allowing workers to move from informal to formal sectors without losing access to benefits. These measures, the bank argues, would raise productivity and well-being simultaneously, rather than trading one for the other.
The political economy of reform
None of these recommendations is new, but the IDB’s framing sharpens the urgency. The report implicitly acknowledges that previous reform efforts have failed because they were piecemeal or faced strong resistance from entrenched interests. Informality is not just a labour-market outcome; it is a political equilibrium in which many actors benefit from the status quo, including some workers who fear losing flexibility and some firms that avoid taxes and regulations.
The IDB’s emphasis on making benefits less dependent on job status is a subtle but important shift. It suggests a model where social protection follows the worker, not the contract, which could reduce the stigma and risk associated with formalisation. Whether governments in the region have the political capital to pursue such reforms remains an open question, but the report provides a clear evidence base for those who do. For now, the numbers speak for themselves: Latin America’s productivity gap is not inevitable, but closing it will require sustained, coordinated effort across multiple fronts.
Sources: Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); Forbes Colombia; El Colombiano; Revista Mercado.
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly is labour productivity, and why does it matter?
Labour productivity measures output per worker or worked. It matters because it determines wages, living standards, and a country’s ability to fund public services. Low productivity means workers produce less, earn less, and have fewer resources for education, health, and infrastructure.
Is the 26% figure a recent development?
No. The IDB report presents it as a long-standing structural feature, not a recent decline. The region has trailed US productivity for decades, and the gap has not narrowed significantly despite periods of economic growth. The report’s contribution is to quantify the gap and link it to specific policy failures.
Can vocational training alone close the gap?
No. Training is necessary but not sufficient. The IDB stresses that training must be paired with formalisation incentives, social-protection reforms, and regulatory changes. Without those complementary measures, workers may gain skills but remain in informal jobs where those skills are underused, limiting the impact on aggregate productivity.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error
Read More from The Rio Times