IBOV 185,556.27 ▼ 0.14% IPSA 11,399.68 ▼ 0.44% IPC MEX 64,276.72 ▼ 0.28% MERVAL 2,969,545 — 0.00% COLCAP 2,612.48 ▲ 0.92% BVL PERÚ 60,625.42 ▼ 1.56% USD/BRL5.17▲ 0.05% USD/MXN17.56▲ 0.17% USD/CLP964.66▲ 0.24% USD/COP3,318▲ 3.40% USD/PEN3.40▲ 0.54% USD/ARS1,518▲ 0.10% USD/UYU40.05▲ 2.84% USD/PYG5,894▲ 2.17% USD/BOB12.18▲ 14.34% USD/DOP59.35▲ 0.59% USD/CRC450.75▲ 4.23% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.19% USD/HNL26.85▲ 3.15% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.62% USD/VES852.33▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.77▲ 2.69% EUR/BRL5.89▲ 0.91% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 185,556.27 ▼ 0.14% IPSA 11,399.68 ▼ 0.44% IPC MEX 64,276.72 ▼ 0.28% MERVAL 2,969,545 — 0.00% COLCAP 2,612.48 ▲ 0.92% BVL PERÚ 60,625.42 ▼ 1.56% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Thursday, September 24, 2026

U.S. Blocks Brazil’s UN Bid on Israel-Hamas

By · October 18, 2023 · 1 min read

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Ecuador empties its streets at night, its plants by day”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

On October 18, 2023, the United Nations Security Council convened to decide on a critical issue.

Brazil proposed a resolution aimed at addressing the Israel-Hamas conflict. While the proposal garnered much support, a veto from the United States led to its downfall.

This report elaborates on the events that unfolded during the meeting.

The Voting Process

Brazil’s resolution received broad support from multiple nations. A total of 12 countries voted in favor, highlighting the consensus on the issue.

However, the vote took a pivotal turn when the United States cast their ballot. Holding veto power, the U.S. single-handedly shot down the proposal by voting against it.

Additionally, two nations opted for abstention, not taking a clear stance.

U.S. Blocks Brazil's UN Bid on Israel-Hamas.
U.S. Blocks Brazil’s UN Bid on Israel-Hamas.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The Impact of the Veto

On October 18, 2023, the United Nations Security Council convened to decide on a critical issue.

The U.S. veto was decisive. Although 12 countries showed approval, the proposal needed unanimous consent from all permanent members.

As the United States is one such member, their “No” vote automatically resulted in the resolution’s failure.

In summary, Brazil’s attempt to resolve the Israel-Hamas conflict through the UN Security Council ended abruptly.

Despite gaining strong support, the proposal did not pass, primarily due to the U.S. veto.

The outcome underlines the powerful role that permanent members hold in shaping global diplomacy.

 

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.