IBOV 174,586.26 ▲ 0.01% IPSA 11,369.18 ▼ 0.71% IPC MEX 66,644.91 ▲ 0.53% MERVAL 3,024,971 ▲ 0.53% COLCAP 2,504.68 ▼ 0.15% BVL PERÚ 60,449.35 ▲ 0.30% USD/BRL5.13▼ 0.32% USD/MXN16.96▲ 0.04% USD/CLP920.93▲ 0.84% USD/COP3,122▲ 0.89% USD/PEN3.35▲ 0.26% USD/ARS1,514▲ 0.17% USD/UYU40.18▲ 1.55% USD/PYG5,957▲ 0.99% USD/BOB11.50▲ 1.47% USD/DOP58.02▲ 0.35% USD/CRC450.21▲ 2.07% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.21% USD/HNL26.82▲ 0.34% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.79% USD/VES789.35▲ 0.36% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.73▲ 1.10% EUR/BRL5.98▼ 0.35% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 174,586.26 ▲ 0.01% IPSA 11,369.18 ▼ 0.71% IPC MEX 66,644.91 ▲ 0.53% MERVAL 3,024,971 ▲ 0.53% COLCAP 2,504.68 ▼ 0.15% BVL PERÚ 60,449.35 ▲ 0.30% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2026

Africa Africa & the Great Powers

Two Ethiopian Peacekeepers Are Killed in an Ambush in South Sudan

By · August 27, 2026 · 5 min read

Africa Intelligence

A daily Africa read from a Latin American newsroom. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

SOUTH SUDAN · SECURITY

Key Facts

What happened: An eight-vehicle UN convoy was ambushed on Monday 24 August 2026 in Jonglei state, about 10km from Jalle.

Casualties: Two Ethiopian peacekeepers were killed. Seven people were injured, all reported stable.

Who was travelling: Thirty-eight people in all, including UN civilian and military staff and four South Sudanese police officers.

No claim: No group has claimed responsibility, and the government has named no actor.

The response: A quick reaction force was sent by road and the injured were evacuated by air.

The mission: UNMISS had its mandate renewed to 30 April 2027, with troop numbers cut sharply from earlier ceilings.

Two Ethiopian peacekeepers were killed and seven other people injured when gunmen ambushed a United Nations convoy in South Sudan’s Jonglei state on 24 August. No group has claimed responsibility and the government has not named anyone.

Ethiopian peacekeepers - a United Nations vehicle on a road in South Sudan
A United Nations vehicle on a road in South Sudan. (Photo: Defensie, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

What is known about the attack on the Ethiopian peacekeepers

The convoy was travelling from Bor towards Pajut when it was attacked roughly ten kilometres from Jalle.

It was an eight-vehicle force-protection convoy carrying thirty-eight people: Ethiopian peacekeepers, UN civilian and military personnel, and four officers of the South Sudan National Police Service.

Two Ethiopian peacekeepers were killed. Three more, two UN civilian staff and two police officers were injured, and all seven were reported in stable condition.

The mission sent a quick reaction force, a standby unit that answers emergencies, by road, and the injured were evacuated by air.

Force-protection convoys of this kind are routine in Jonglei, and they are escorted precisely because the roads are not safe.

The mission has not said what the convoy was travelling to do.

Nobody has been blamed, and that is deliberate

The United Nations has described the attackers only as unidentified armed individuals.

South Sudan’s foreign ministry condemned the attack and called for a joint investigation, without naming any group.

No organisation has claimed responsibility, which in Jonglei is not unusual.

Pajut, the convoy’s destination, has changed hands during this year’s fighting between government and opposition forces, but proximity is not attribution.

Attribution in Jonglei is genuinely difficult, with armed youth formations operating alongside and sometimes independently of the main forces.

Naming a culprit early has gone badly wrong before.

The reaction

Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the ambush in the strongest possible terms and noted that attacks on peacekeepers may constitute war crimes.

Jean-Pierre Lacroix, who heads UN peace operations, said he was deeply saddened by the deaths and offered condolences to the families and to the government of Ethiopia.

The head of the mission, Anita Kiki Gbeho, made the same point about international humanitarian law.

Ethiopia’s embassy in Juba paid tribute to the fallen and called for a prompt investigation, and Egypt’s foreign ministry also condemned the attack.

The United States embassy in Juba and the body that monitors the peace agreement also issued condemnations.

None of the statements named a suspected perpetrator.

Guterres called for a prompt investigation and for those responsible to be prosecuted.

Attacks on peacekeepers are among the few categories where the United Nations reliably presses host states for accountability.

Why Jonglei is dangerous right now

The usual shorthand for Jonglei violence is cattle raiding and communal conflict, and that history is real, but it is not what is driving the present danger.

In late December 2025 opposition forces launched an offensive across majority-Nuer parts of Jonglei, in response to the continued imprisonment of Riek Machar.

The army launched a counter-offensive in January 2026, and heavy ground fighting followed, with opposition forces withdrawing from Pajut.

United Nations humanitarian updates cited by regional outlets put displacement within Jonglei since the start of the year at more than 280,000 people.

Regional reporting citing UN agencies also puts the number of aid workers killed in South Sudan this year at at least 36.

Separately, the mission condemned attacks in Warrap state in August that reportedly killed more than sixty civilians.

Pajut changed hands during that fighting, which is why a convoy heading there needed an escort at all.

The road between Bor and Pajut has been among the more exposed routes in the state this year.

A mission getting smaller as the risk grows

Machar, the first vice-president, was placed under house arrest in March 2025 and charged in September with treason, murder and crimes against humanity.

His party calls the proceedings a political trial, and analysts have warned that they put the 2018 peace agreement at risk.

Against that backdrop the Security Council renewed the mission in April 2026 to 30 April 2027, but cut the troop ceiling to 12,500 from 17,000.

Actual deployed strength was already well below the old ceiling after United Nations budget cuts, a product of a wider funding squeeze rather than any judgement that South Sudan had grown calmer.

The Council also asked the Secretary-General to complete a military and police capability study within 120 days of the renewal.

That review falls due at the end of August, which is to say now.

The reduced ceiling was itself a compromise, with the United States initially proposing a far smaller force.

A mission shrinking while the conflict widens is the central tension in South Sudan’s international presence.

Frequently asked questions

How many peacekeepers were killed in the Jonglei ambush?

Two Ethiopian peacekeepers were killed. Seven other people were injured, including three peacekeepers, two UN civilian staff and two South Sudanese police officers.

Who attacked the UN convoy in South Sudan?

No group has claimed responsibility. The United Nations refers to unidentified armed individuals, and South Sudan’s government has not named any actor.

Where did the attack take place?

In Jonglei state, about ten kilometres from Jalle, while the convoy travelled from Bor towards Pajut on 24 August 2026.

How large is the UN mission in South Sudan?

The Security Council renewed the mandate to 30 April 2027 with a ceiling of 12,500 troops, down from 17,000. Deployed strength was already well below that ceiling after UN-wide budget cuts.

Sources

UNMISS press release: Ambush on patrol in Jonglei, 24 August 2026 · UN Secretary-General’s statement (SG/SM/23245) · AllAfrica: South Sudan vows probe after ambush · Xinhua: Security Council renews UNMISS mandate with reduced troop ceiling

Connected Coverage

South Sudan’s fragility runs through its finances as well as its security, as the restart of salary payments after months of arrears showed. The wider regional contest is covered in Africa: The New Scramble.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.