IBOV 187,422.92 ▲ 0.44% IPSA 11,426.83 ▲ 0.61% IPC MEX 63,646.88 ▲ 0.17% MERVAL 2,997,659 ▼ 0.04% COLCAP 2,588.64 ▲ 0.90% BVL PERÚ 59,529.36 ▲ 1.84% USD/BRL5.10▼ 0.17% USD/MXN17.31▲ 0.52% USD/CLP943.65▼ 0.59% USD/COP3,203▲ 0.85% USD/PEN3.38▲ 0.07% USD/ARS1,514▼ 0.02% USD/UYU40.06▲ 2.88% USD/PYG5,918▲ 3.14% USD/BOB11.85▲ 25.24% USD/DOP59.17▲ 3.53% USD/CRC445.27▲ 2.84% USD/GTQ7.63▲ 3.24% USD/HNL26.86▲ 3.32% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.80% USD/VES851.37— 0.00% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.74▲ 2.48% EUR/BRL5.84▼ 1.04% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 187,422.92 ▲ 0.44% IPSA 11,426.83 ▲ 0.61% IPC MEX 63,646.88 ▲ 0.17% MERVAL 2,997,659 ▼ 0.04% COLCAP 2,588.64 ▲ 0.90% BVL PERÚ 59,529.36 ▲ 1.84% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Mexican Urban Safety Perception Improves, but 58.6% Still Feel Unsafe

By · October 21, 2024 · 2 min read

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “68 strikes, 223 people. A UN expert says murder.”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

The perception of safety in Mexican cities has improved over recent years. A new survey reveals that fewer urban residents feel unsafe in their localities compared to previous years.

This shift marks a positive trend in public sentiment regarding security across the country. According to the latest National Urban Public Safety Survey by INEGI, 58.6% of urban Mexicans consider their area unsafe.

This figure represents a historic low, showing a notable change from last year’s 61.4%. The improvement reflects a significant shift in public opinion on local safety.

Five years ago, over 80% of urban Mexicans felt unsafe in their cities. Today, that number has dropped by nearly 20 percentage points.

However, challenges persist as more than half of the urban population still perceives their locality as dangerous. Gender disparities in safety perception remain a concern.

Mexican Urban Safety Perception Improves, but 58.6% Still Feel Unsafe
Mexican Urban Safety Perception Improves, but 58.6% Still Feel Unsafe.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Women feel more unsafe than men, with 64.0% of women viewing their city as dangerous compared to 52.2% of men. This difference stems from specific types of violence against women and the hostile environments they face.

Public Safety in Mexico

Public spaces like ATMs, public transport, and streets are where Mexicans feel most vulnerable. In recent years, highways have also become one of the top five areas perceived as unsafe.

These findings highlight the need for targeted safety measures in public spaces. Tapachula, Chiapas, now ranks as Mexico’s most unsafe city, with 91.9% of its residents feeling endangered.

Naucalpan and Fresnillo follow closely, with 88.0% and 87.0% of their populations feeling unsafe, respectively. These high percentages underscore the urgent need for improved security measures.

On the other hand, San Pedro Garza García leads as the safest city. Only 13.7% of its residents feel unsafe. Benito Juárez in Mexico City and Tampico follow, with 17.5% and 20.0% feeling unsafe, respectively.

These cities serve as positive examples for others to emulate. Despite improvements, half of the urban population remains pessimistic about future safety.

31.8% believe the situation will remain poor, while 20.0% expect it to worsen. This outlook suggests a need for continued efforts to boost public confidence in security measures.

Interestingly, trust in federal authorities, especially the armed forces, remains high. Nine out of ten urban residents view the Navy’s crime prevention efforts positively.

The Air Force, Army, and National Guard also receive high approval ratings, ranging from 73.5% to 83.9%. However, local security forces face lower approval ratings.

Only 55.8% of urban residents view state police performance positively, while 48.6% approve of municipal preventive police. This disparity highlights the need for improved local policing strategies to boost public confidence.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.