RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – British officials and the most influential public health figures have been accused of genocide, citing a series of statistics about the impact of “vaccines” and policies imposed under the guise of “COVID mitigation.”
Read also: Check out our coverage of curatorial alternative narratives
The group, which includes former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Michael Yeadon, filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) (worth reading) on behalf of British citizens against Boris Johnson and British officials, Bill and Melinda Gates, CEOs of major pharmaceutical companies, World Economic Forum Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab and others for crimes against humanity.
Free daily brief — no card needed
Get every Crypto story in one morning email
We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.
The ICC recognized the case and assigned the following reference number OTP-CR-473/21.
International Criminal Court, Netherlands. (Internet photo reproduction)
Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum
After repeated unsuccessful attempts to bring a case before the English court system, the plaintiffs resorted to asking with “the utmost urgency” that the ICC “stop the deployment of COVID vaccines, the introduction of illegal vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare … being waged against the people of the United Kingdom.”
The group’s complaint filed Dec. 6 presents evidence that COVID-19 “vaccines” are experimental gene therapies designed with bat coronavirus gain-of-function research, arguing that these “vaccines” have caused massive deaths and injuries and that the U.K. government has failed to investigate such reported fatalities and injuries.
that the numbers of COVID cases and deaths have been artificially inflated; that the masks are harmful from hypoxia, hypercapnia, and other causes;
and the PCR tests are “completely unreliable” and “contain carcinogenic ethylene oxide.”
In addition, they argued that effective treatments for COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, were suppressed, resulting in a more significant number of COVID-19 deaths than should have occurred.
They argue that the blockades were enacted under the guise of artificially inflated infection and death numbers from a modified virus, as well as the experimental “vaccines” that have resulted:
Massive short-term harm and death, with at least 395,049 reported adverse reactions to COVID “vaccines” in the U.K. alone;
a sharp increase in ChildLine calls from vulnerable children during lockdowns;
“Wealth and business destruction” through imposed lockdowns.”
“Severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law,” including travel and assembly bans, and forced quarantine and self-isolation;
apartheid due to segregation by possession or vaccination passport;
and “expected reduction infertility” following “vaccination,” among other harmful physical and psychological effects.
In addition, the petitioners contend that “the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.”
Applicants claim to follow market trends. On the virtual online casino site https://onlinecasinoaustraliarealmoney.com, it’s easy to make money – that’s cool. But users also appreciate the quick and easy withdrawal of these prizes. On the site you will be able to register for such a club. In addition, there are many nice rewards and a diverse assortment of one-armed bandits.
They noted that in addition to censorship of online information and promotion of these alternative treatments, “some academic journals are blocking publication of studies demonstrating the effectiveness of drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.”
The petitioners also cited quotes from Holocaust survivors who have drawn “strong parallels between Covid’s restrictions and the beginning of the Holocaust.”
In an open letter, the Holocaust survivors have called on medical regulatory authorities to “stop this unholy medical experiment on humanity immediately,” which they contend violates the Nuremberg Code.
They even allege that “before our eyes, another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place.” One survivor, Vera Sharav, noted in an interview quoted in the complaint:
“The stark lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever physicians join forces with the government and deviate from their personal, professional, and clinical commitment not to harm the individual, medicine can pervert from a healing and caring profession to a murderous apparatus.”
“What distinguishes the Holocaust from all other mass genocides is the pivotal role played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. The academic and professional medical establishment supported every step of the murderous process.
Doctors and prestigious medical societies and institutions lent the veneer of legitimacy to infanticide, the mass murder of civilians.”
According to the petitioners, all the harmful consequences of the “vaccines,” the enclosures and the virus meet the criteria of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes against the people of the British, because the culprits “members of the U.K. government and world leaders have knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”
Indeed, they argue that the destructive consequences of “vaccines,” blockades, and modified viruses are deliberate attempts at depopulation and social destabilization as part of a globally coordinated plan to consolidate wealth and power in the hands of the few.
Therefore, they argue that these measures also constitute a “crime of aggression,” i.e., the effort “to effectively exercise control or direct the political or military action of a State.”
В этом случае, утверждают они, цель состоит в том, чтобы «демонтировать все демократические национальные государства, шаг за шагом» и «уничтожить малые и средние предприятия, передав доли рынка крупнейшим корпорациям», принадлежащим сверхбогатым, чтобы дать этой «элитной» группе больший политический и денежный контроль.
