IBOV 185,147.15 ▼ 0.02% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 64,866.61 ▼ 0.87% MERVAL 3,049,121 ▼ 0.29% COLCAP 2,544.56 ▲ 0.40% BVL PERÚ 59,978.22 ▼ 0.31% USD/BRL5.12▼ 0.03% USD/MXN16.88▼ 0.26% USD/CLP933.68— 0.00% USD/COP3,124▼ 1.12% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.34% USD/ARS1,509▲ 0.01% USD/UYU40.24▲ 1.26% USD/PYG5,947▲ 2.52% USD/BOB12.40▲ 3.51% USD/DOP59.00▲ 0.85% USD/CRC448.67▲ 1.62% USD/GTQ7.63▲ 2.29% USD/HNL26.84▲ 0.28% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.07% USD/VES805.37▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.91% EUR/BRL5.95▲ 0.91% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 185,147.15 ▼ 0.02% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 64,866.61 ▼ 0.87% MERVAL 3,049,121 ▼ 0.29% COLCAP 2,544.56 ▲ 0.40% BVL PERÚ 59,978.22 ▼ 0.31% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Saturday, September 5, 2026

Brazil Politics - Brazil

Brazil’s Nuclear Dilemma: Angra 3 Could Cost Consumers Up to $10 Billion

By · January 14, 2025 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

A confidential study by Brazil’s Energy Research Company (EPE) reveals a startling fact: completing the Angra 3 nuclear power plant could cost Brazilian consumers up to R$61.5 billion ($9.92 billion) more on their electricity bills over 40 years.

This finding underscores the complex debate surrounding Brazil’s energy future and the role of nuclear power in meeting growing demand. The Angra 3 project, under construction since 1981, is now at a critical juncture.

With 65% of the work completed, it requires an additional R$23 billion ($3.71 billion) to finish. The study compares Angra 3’s projected energy cost of R$653.31 ($0.11 billion) per Megawatt-hour (MWh) with various alternative energy sources.

Even in the most favorable scenario, comparing Angra 3 to gas-fired thermoelectric plants, consumers would pay R$21.09 billion ($3.40 billion) more over four decades.

Other comparisons show even higher costs, reaching up to R$61.55 billion ($9.93 billion) more than alternative energy sources. Despite these figures, Minister of Mines and Energy Alexandre Silveira supports completing Angra 3.

Brazil's Nuclear Dilemma: Angra 3 Could Cost Consumers Up to $10 Billion
Brazil’s Nuclear Dilemma: Angra 3 Could Cost Consumers Up to $10 Billion.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The National Energy Policy Council (CNPE) is set to decide on the project’s future, with the EPE study informing this crucial decision. Proponents argue that Angra 3 offers benefits such as zero greenhouse gas emissions, high-skilled job creation, and energy security.

Brazil’s Energy Debate

However, experts question whether these advantages justify the substantial cost to consumers. The debate extends beyond Angra 3 to Brazil’s broader energy strategy.

Electricity demand is projected to grow by 3.5% annually over the next decade. The country faces significant challenges in meeting its energy needs while balancing costs, environmental concerns, and technological advancements.

As Brazil grapples with this decision, the outcome will shape not only the country’s energy landscape but also impact consumer costs and economic development for decades to come.

The Angra 3 project highlights the global challenges of transitioning to sustainable energy sources. It also underscores the complexities of managing economic realities in the process.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.