IBOV 172,457.76 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,204.98 ▼ 0.84% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.67▲ 0.45% USD/MXN18.52▼ 0.42% USD/CLP994.16▼ 0.13% USD/COP3,302▲ 0.70% USD/PEN3.40▼ 0.16% USD/ARS1,544▼ 0.11% USD/UYU40.59▲ 2.33% USD/PYG6,196▲ 2.33% USD/BOB11.59▼ 0.37% USD/DOP60.59▲ 1.85% USD/CRC442.74▼ 0.10% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 2.06% USD/HNL26.91▲ 2.15% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.73% USD/VES909.35▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.69▲ 1.39% USD/TTD6.75▲ 1.58% EUR/BRL6.25▲ 0.93% BRENT 95.84 ▲ 0.02% WTI 88.56 ▼ 0.20% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.09 ▼ 1.50% GOLD 3,886 ▲ 0.03% SILVER 49.12 ▼ 1.70% SOY 1,232 ▲ 0.37% CORN 445.50 ▲ 0.68% WHEAT 593.25 ▲ 1.54% COFFEE 279.25 ▼ 0.34% SUGAR 18.40 ▲ 0.99% ORANGE JUICE 136.85 ▼ 2.91% COTTON 79.02 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,123 ▲ 1.13% BEEF 224.80 ▲ 2.70% CATTLE 335.35 ▼ 0.10% LITHIUM 58.76 ▼ 1.13% PETR4 45.30 ▲ 1.34% VALE3 63.50 ▼ 0.70% ITUB4 42.27 ▲ 1.42% BBDC4 14.52 ▲ 1.40% ABEV3 15.79 ▲ 0.25% BBAS3 15.10 ▼ 2.45% B3SA3 14.89 ▲ 0.88% WEGE3 51.31 ▼ 0.66% PRIO3 63.30 — 0.00% SUZB3 54.77 ▼ 2.27% RENT3 30.07 ▲ 1.66% AZZA3 15.91 ▼ 5.86% CSAN3 3.10 ▲ 8.77% RAIZ4 20.00 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.56 ▲ 7.11% GMAT3 4.25 ▲ 10.68% PSSA3 46.41 ▲ 1.02% CVCB3 0.83 ▼ 1.19% POSI3 3.15 ▼ 6.53% SLCE3 18.28 ▼ 0.44% NATU3 5.13 ▼ 3.75% BRKM5 3.02 ▼ 1.63% RANI3 8.18 — 0.00% CSNA3 3.72 ▼ 12.06% IBOV 172,457.76 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,204.98 ▼ 0.84% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.67 ▲ 0.45% USD/MXN 18.52 ▼ 0.42% USD/CLP 994.16 ▼ 0.13% USD/COP 3,302 ▲ 0.70% USD/PEN 3.40 ▼ 0.16% USD/ARS 1,544 ▼ 0.11% USD/UYU 40.59 ▲ 2.33% USD/PYG 6,196 ▲ 2.33% USD/BOB 11.59 ▼ 0.37% USD/DOP 60.59 ▲ 1.85% USD/CRC 442.74 ▼ 0.10% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 2.06% USD/HNL 26.91 ▲ 2.15% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 2.73% USD/VES 909.35 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.69 ▲ 1.39% USD/TTD 6.75 ▲ 1.58% EUR/BRL 6.25 ▲ 0.93% BRENT 95.84 ▲ 0.02% WTI 88.56 ▼ 0.20% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.09 ▼ 1.50% GOLD 3,886 ▲ 0.03% SILVER 49.12 ▼ 1.70% SOY 1,232 ▲ 0.37% CORN 445.50 ▲ 0.68% WHEAT 593.25 ▲ 1.54% COFFEE 279.25 ▼ 0.34% SUGAR 18.40 ▲ 0.99% ORANGE JUICE 136.85 ▼ 2.91% COTTON 79.02 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,123 ▲ 1.13% BEEF 224.80 ▲ 2.70% CATTLE 335.35 ▼ 0.10% LITHIUM 58.76 ▼ 1.13% PETR4 45.30 ▲ 1.34% VALE3 63.50 ▼ 0.70% ITUB4 42.27 ▲ 1.42% BBDC4 14.52 ▲ 1.40% ABEV3 15.79 ▲ 0.25% BBAS3 15.10 ▼ 2.45% B3SA3 14.89 ▲ 0.88% WEGE3 51.31 ▼ 0.66% PRIO3 63.30 — 0.00% SUZB3 54.77 ▼ 2.27% RENT3 30.07 ▲ 1.66% AZZA3 15.91 ▼ 5.86% CSAN3 3.10 ▲ 8.77% RAIZ4 20.00 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.56 ▲ 7.11% GMAT3 4.25 ▲ 10.68% PSSA3 46.41 ▲ 1.02% CVCB3 0.83 ▼ 1.19% POSI3 3.15 ▼ 6.53% SLCE3 18.28 ▼ 0.44% NATU3 5.13 ▼ 3.75% BRKM5 3.02 ▼ 1.63% RANI3 8.18 — 0.00% CSNA3 3.72 ▼ 12.06%
since 2009
Saturday, November 14, 2026

Life & Society Society

Post-Pandemic: Debt of World’s Poorest Will Explode in Five Years

By · · 3 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – While the poor run into debt, the wealthy save more.

The trend that governments and Central Banks have been pursuing since the start of the coronavirus crisis may have been undermined for the time being, but the chances are high for a worsening scenario after the end of emergency aid to companies and the vulnerable.

The alert is provided by an Oxford Economics report, which sees the risk of a sharp deterioration in the global inequality scenario over the next five years due to the pandemic.

Free daily brief — no card needed
Get every Life & Society story in one morning email
We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.
Income inequality after pandemics: Gini index advance (%) (higher indicates more inequality).
Income inequality after pandemics: Gini index advance (%) (higher indicates more inequality). (Photo: Oxford Economics)
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

This trend has been fuelled since the 1980s by the strong migration of income to the wealthier section of the population, on the one hand, and by the growing indebtedness of the poorer families, on the other.

“The poorest families spend more of their income on essential goods such as housing and basic foodstuffs. When their income drops, they are still forced to spend on what is necessary and are therefore often forced into debt,” it says.

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Exxon gets Guyana approval for a gas project”

The wealthy, on the other hand, typically use up almost the maximum capacity of their consumption desires, so any additional income is saved for future support.

In addition, “evidence from past pandemics points to an increase in income inequality since the burden of economic adjustment falls disproportionately on low-skilled workers,” the paper says.

In pandemic contexts, low-skilled work is also more often undermined by isolation policies that impair confidence in the use of in-person services.

“A unique feature of this pandemic is that the ability to work from home is proving to be a key factor in determining job losses,” says Oxford Economics.

In other words, the most threatened jobs are those that cannot easily be performed at home (e.g. restaurants) and are also typically underpaid.

The losses among the poorest were also the greatest during the 2008 global financial crisis.

The effect is perpetual

There are three ways to describe inequality in a society, explains the consultancy:

  • Income, which has far-reaching short-term implications;
  • Wealth, which results in a deepening division over time: income is generated and often consumed during the lifetime of a family; wealth, however, can be inherited and passed on from generation to generation.
  • Consumption, which shows how consumption of goods and services is spread throughout the economy: The drop in consumer spending in recent months has been much greater for higher-income groups, as more spending can be deferred.

This latter way of measuring inequality is relevant because spending is often smoothed out over an individual’s lifetime by means of loans, savings, and emergency aid and therefore may differ from income at times.

High-income households are still spending 11 percent below pre-coronavirus trends, compared with a high of two percent among the poorest.

Historical

Income inequality has grown substantially since the 1980s in advanced economies, particularly in the United Kingdom and the United States, after technological changes in the labor market and the fragility of labor unions, says the consultancy:

Between the early 1980s and 2017, the share of income held by the top one percent doubled from 11 percent in the US and six percent in the UK to 21 and 13 percent, respectively.

Over the past three decades, the distribution of wealth in France, the United Kingdom and the US has also become even more slanted towards the top of the social pyramid. On average, the poorest 50 percent held only six percent of total wealth in the mid-1980s; by 2014, this had halved to only three percent.

During that period, the wealth of the richest ten percent grew rapidly from 53 to 71 percent.

The graph below shows a sharp increase in revenues (red line) to the wealthiest one percent since the 1980s, which contributed to debt (blue line) reaching levels unseen since World War II:

The graph shows a sharp increase in revenues (red line) to the wealthiest one percent since the 1980s, which contributed to debt (blue line) reaching levels unseen since World War II.
The graph shows a sharp increase in revenues (red line) to the wealthiest one percent since the 1980s, which contributed to debt (blue line) reaching levels unseen since World War II. (Photo: Oxford Economics)

Source: Exame

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.