IBOV 171,006.10 ▼ 2.68% IPC MEX 69,182.39 ▼ 0.76% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.36▲ 0.13% USD/MXN18.78▲ 0.78% USD/CLP994.45▲ 0.67% USD/COP3,167▲ 0.54% USD/PEN3.45▲ 0.09% USD/ARS1,539▼ 0.18% USD/UYU40.10▲ 3.30% USD/PYG5,838▲ 3.76% USD/BOB12.05▲ 4.53% USD/DOP60.36▲ 0.43% USD/CRC451.45▲ 2.55% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.31% USD/HNL26.87▲ 0.27% USD/NIO36.62▼ 0.02% USD/VES886.67▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.79▲ 2.42% USD/TTD6.70▲ 2.01% EUR/BRL5.97▲ 0.26% BRENT 109.58 ▼ 5.38% WTI 100.12 ▼ 1.61% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.65 ▲ 2.24% GOLD 4,073 ▲ 0.85% SILVER 54.49 ▲ 0.70% SOY 1,250 ▲ 0.70% CORN 450.25 ▼ 1.04% WHEAT 614.75 ▼ 0.20% COFFEE 294.35 ▼ 2.19% SUGAR 19.26 ▲ 0.84% ORANGE JUICE 143.20 ▲ 5.45% COTTON 77.90 ▼ 1.47% COCOA 5,581 ▲ 1.66% BEEF 230.73 ▲ 0.33% CATTLE 346.40 ▼ 1.00% LITHIUM 62.43 ▲ 1.89% PETR4 53.31 ▼ 1.06% VALE3 62.88 ▼ 2.33% ITUB4 41.42 ▼ 0.67% BBDC4 15.69 ▼ 1.63% ABEV3 15.40 ▲ 0.20% BBAS3 17.59 ▲ 0.69% B3SA3 15.27 ▲ 1.33% WEGE3 45.78 ▲ 2.81% PRIO3 69.21 ▼ 2.71% SUZB3 47.14 ▼ 0.55% RENT3 31.14 ▼ 1.67% AZZA3 16.72 ▲ 1.15% CSAN3 2.69 ▼ 2.89% RAIZ4 0.34 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.22 ▼ 3.48% GMAT3 3.74 ▲ 2.19% PSSA3 47.75 ▼ 0.89% CVCB3 0.98 — 0.00% POSI3 3.56 ▼ 0.84% SLCE3 16.97 ▼ 2.75% NATU3 5.68 ▼ 3.89% BRKM5 3.80 ▲ 19.50% RANI3 7.34 ▼ 0.54% CSNA3 4.76 ▼ 4.99% IBOV 171,006.10 ▼ 2.68% IPC MEX 69,182.39 ▼ 0.76% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.34 ▼ 1.32% USD/MXN 18.69 ▲ 0.62% USD/CLP 983.47 ▼ 0.57% USD/COP 3,149 ▲ 3.06% USD/PEN 3.45 ▲ 0.17% USD/ARS 1,537 ▼ 0.28% USD/UYU 40.21 ▲ 3.57% USD/PYG 5,803 ▲ 3.78% USD/BOB 11.97 ▲ 4.93% USD/DOP 60.54 ▲ 1.83% USD/CRC 451.24 ▲ 2.13% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.23% USD/HNL 26.87 ▲ 3.37% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 2.81% USD/VES 885.08 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.69 ▲ 2.63% USD/TTD 6.71 ▲ 2.07% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 7.53% BRENT 109.58 ▼ 5.38% WTI 100.12 ▼ 1.61% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.65 ▲ 2.24% GOLD 4,073 ▲ 0.85% SILVER 54.49 ▲ 0.70% SOY 1,250 ▲ 0.70% CORN 450.25 ▼ 1.04% WHEAT 614.75 ▼ 0.20% COFFEE 294.35 ▼ 2.19% SUGAR 19.26 ▲ 0.84% ORANGE JUICE 143.20 ▲ 5.45% COTTON 77.90 ▼ 1.47% COCOA 5,581 ▲ 1.66% BEEF 230.73 ▲ 0.33% CATTLE 346.40 ▼ 1.00% LITHIUM 62.43 ▲ 1.89% PETR4 53.31 ▼ 1.06% VALE3 62.88 ▼ 2.33% ITUB4 41.42 ▼ 0.67% BBDC4 15.69 ▼ 1.63% ABEV3 15.40 ▲ 0.20% BBAS3 17.59 ▲ 0.69% B3SA3 15.27 ▲ 1.33% WEGE3 45.78 ▲ 2.81% PRIO3 69.21 ▼ 2.71% SUZB3 47.14 ▼ 0.55% RENT3 31.14 ▼ 1.67% AZZA3 16.72 ▲ 1.15% CSAN3 2.69 ▼ 2.89% RAIZ4 0.34 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.22 ▼ 3.48% GMAT3 3.74 ▲ 2.19% PSSA3 47.75 ▼ 0.89% CVCB3 0.98 — 0.00% POSI3 3.56 ▼ 0.84% SLCE3 16.97 ▼ 2.75% NATU3 5.68 ▼ 3.89% BRKM5 3.80 ▲ 19.50% RANI3 7.34 ▼ 0.54% CSNA3 4.76 ▼ 4.99%
since 2009
Thursday, October 29, 2026

Three-Quarters of All Brazilian Municipalities Struggle to Balance Their Accounts

By · November 2, 2019 · 3 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – Approximately 4,000 Brazilian cities are struggling to balance their accounts. According to the 2019 FIRJAN Index of Fiscal Management (IFGF), prepared by the Federation of Industries of Rio de Janeiro (FIRJAN), the fiscal position of 73.9 percent of all Brazil’s municipalities is considered difficult or critical. Many of them are unable to generate enough revenue to pay for their administrative services and rely on federal transfers to pay municipal workers salaries.

According to the manager of economics at FIRJAN, municipal management is worse than five years ago.
According to the manager of economics at FIRJAN, municipal management is worse than five years ago.
RT
Ask Rio Times
Latin American markets, currencies and companies.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The crisis, which has persisted since 2013, is the result of an equation that combines a lack of autonomy of municipalities to raise their revenues with a growing expenditure on personnel. When the accounts do not balance, the “solution” has been to cut investments and, as a result, compromise the quality of services to the population.

“The municipalities have not yet been able to adapt to this new economic reality in Brazil and are not meeting the population’s wishes and expectations,” says Jonathas Goulart, manager of economics at FIRJAN. According to him, municipal management is worse than five years ago. In the period between 2013 and 2018, personnel expenses grew R$29 billion (US$7.3 billion) while investments dropped R$10 billion.

The FIRJAN study assessed the accounts of 5,337 municipalities in 2018. The data are reported by municipalities by April 30th each year to the National Treasury Secretariat. Only 231 cities failed to submit the data within the deadline – or reported the data with some degree of inconsistency. The FIRJAN index evaluates four indicators in municipal management: Autonomy, Staff Expenses, Liquidity, and Investments.

The worst result was found in the Autonomy Indicator, which measures the city’s potential to generate revenue to cover its expenses. Goulart states that 1,856 municipalities received a zero score in this respect. These municipalities spend, on average, R$4.5 million on administrative structure, but have only R$3 million in local revenues. In total, spending on administrative costs adds up to R$12 billion, while the amount earmarked for health is R$14 billion.

The FIRJAN index shows two different countries with a high percentage of unsustainable municipalities in the North and Northeast regions and a much lower percentage in the South, Southeast, and Center-West Regions.
The FIRJAN index shows high percentage of unsustainable municipalities in Brazil’s North and Northeast regions, but a much lower percentage in the South, Southeast, and Center-West.

Inequality

The FIRJAN executive explains that this index shows two different countries. In Brazil’s Northeast and North, 71 and 45.6 percent of the municipalities are unsustainable. These percentages are much lower in the remainder of Brazil. In the Southeast, 18.6 percent scored zero in this regard; in the Center-West, 16.4 percent; and in the South, only 6.6 percent.

Another indicator showing the fragility of municipal management is Personnel Expenditure. According to the FIRJAN study, half of all Brazilian municipalities are in a critical situation, spending over the cautionary limit of 54 percent of their revenues. There are 2,635 cities in this situation, 821 of which are in violation of the law, with expenditures above 60 percent.

The best result for the cities was the Liquidity index, which shows the difficulty in the volume of unpaid surplus that is left for the following year without cash coverage. Although the result has been better, 1,121 municipalities were on overdraft for lack of budgetary planning.

The investment rate, although not the worst, is what most affects the population’s lives. “What they invest is not even enough to keep up the worn-out structure during the year,” says Goulart. According to FIRJAN, 47 percent of all city governments are in a critical situation in this regard. Among these cities, the mayors invest less than three percent of the budget.

Source: O Estado de S. Paulo

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error · Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.