BRAZIL · ELECTIONS
Published Thursday, 22 October, 12:56 p.m. ET · Source: Brazil’s electoral prosecutor (Procuradoria-Geral Eleitoral)
Key Facts
- What happened An opinion from Brazil’s electoral prosecutor, made public on Thursday 22 October, says Meta did not fully obey electoral court (TSE) orders on equal treatment of the two runoff campaigns.
- The ask The prosecutor suggests a fine for Meta but names no amount.
- Existing fine The court set a fine of R$500,000 a day (about US$99,200) on 15 October.
- Power Index Brazil ranks 1st of 14 in The Rio Times Latin America Power Index, with 75.0 points (October 2026 edition).
- Prediction markets Kalshi, regulated in the US by the CFTC, prices a Flávio Bolsonaro win by at least 1 point at 68% (22 October, 12:55 p.m. ET). Polymarket puts Flávio Bolsonaro’s chance of winning at 78% and Kalshi at 79% (Lula: 23% and 22%), as of 22 October, 1:20 pm ET; prices are bets, not polls.
- Still open The court’s rapporteur, Minister Marco Aurélio Bellizze, has not yet ruled on a new penalty.
Runoff · Sunday, 25 October
Brazil Runoff 2026: Lula vs Flávio
Date, polls, debates, odds and how the runoff works, updated every day.
Read our Brazil election 2026 runoff guide →
Brazil election 2026 · Brazil election polls · Who will win: Brazil election odds · Brazil runoff date and results start · Brazil election results · Brazil election poll data (CSV) · All election stories
Brazil’s electoral prosecutor says Meta, the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, has not fully obeyed court orders to treat the two runoff campaigns equally. The opinion, made public on Thursday 22 October, suggests a fine, according to Poder360 and A Rede.
The runoff on Sunday 25 October pits President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva against Flávio Bolsonaro, senator for Rio de Janeiro, so any penalty on a US tech giant would land days before voting. Our Brazil election 2026 guide has the full calendar, and our earlier report explains the Meta restrictions in detail.
What the Prosecutor Told the Court
The opinion came after Minister Marco Aurélio Bellizze, the TSE judge handling the case, asked for proof that Meta was following the court’s measures, ICL Notícias reported. The prosecutor says the company did not meet every requirement on statistics and on the filters of its artificial intelligence tool.
It also says Meta handled complaints from the two campaigns differently, A Rede reported. According to Poder360, Meta also owes individual reports on ads it re-reviewed or suspended.
Translation and Image Tool Findings
The prosecutor points to differences in how Meta’s translation tool and AI image generator responded depending on the candidate mentioned, Esportes & Notícias reported. One example cited is a translation that turned the word for prisoner into the word for president.
In the opinion’s words, the difference in response by candidacy “reduces the credibility” of the idea that the errors were random, according to ICL Notícias. The reports we reviewed do not include a public reply from Meta on these points.
What Meta Did Comply With
The prosecutor recognises that Meta reversed restrictions on advertising accounts, suspended political ads that campaigns had not contracted, and reimbursed boosts that were never delivered, A Rede reported. So the opinion describes partial compliance, not a refusal.
The court first set a fine of R$500,000 a day (about US$99,200 at 5.04 reais to the dollar) on 15 October. On 18 October Bellizze warned the fine would double to R$1 million a day (about US$198,000) if Meta did not prove compliance within 24 hours, Poder360 reported.
What It Means for You
If you hold Meta shares, this is a legal risk in a major market, since the court can penalise Meta daily until it complies. The court decides whether to apply the penalty, so the opinion alone changes nothing yet.
If you follow US politics, the case shows a foreign court holding a US platform to account over how its tools treat two candidates. Our report on the prosecutors’ lawsuit covers the separate civil case over blocked accounts.
What Prediction Markets Say
On Kalshi, which is regulated in the US by the CFTC, traders price a Flávio Bolsonaro win by at least 1 point at 68% and a Lula win by at least 1 point at 16% (22 October, 12:55 p.m. ET). The runoff margin markets have drawn about 133,000 contracts traded.
Why we show this: prediction markets turn real-money bets into a live probability that moves within minutes of the news, which is why investors, campaigns and newsrooms in the United States now follow them closely. We show them next to polls and official results, never instead of them.
Prediction markets · who wins the runoff
Implied chance of winning Brazil’s presidency on 25 October, from traders’ prices.
Polymarket
Flávio Bolsonaro 77.8% · Lula 22.5% (US$192 million traded)
Kalshi (regulated in the US by the CFTC)
Flávio Bolsonaro 79% · Lula 22%
As of 22 October, 1:20 pm ET (18:20 Lisbon), updated every 20 minutes. Prices are bets, not polls, and can move fast.
Why we show this: prediction markets turn real-money bets into a live probability that moves within minutes of the news, which is why investors, campaigns and newsrooms in the United States now follow them closely. We show them next to polls and official results, never instead of them.
What Is Not Known
The prosecutor did not name a fine amount, and it is not known when Bellizze will rule or whether the higher fine of R$1 million a day now applies. Meta’s reply to this opinion has not been reported.
It is also unknown whether the court will order further changes to Meta’s tools before 25 October. The opinion is a recommendation, and the judge is not bound to follow it.
More: Brazil news in English, every day from The Rio Times.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does Brazil’s prosecutor say Meta did not obey the court?
The electoral prosecutor says Meta did not fully meet the court’s demands on statistics, AI filters and equal handling of complaints. It also noted differences in how Meta’s translation and image tools treated the two candidates.
Has Meta been fined in Brazil’s election case?
The court set a fine of R$500,000 a day (about US$99,200) on 15 October if Meta does not comply. The prosecutor now suggests a fine for non-compliance without naming an amount, and the court has not yet ruled.
Did Meta comply with any of the orders?
Yes, in part. The prosecutor says Meta reversed ad account restrictions, suspended uncontracted political ads and reimbursed undelivered boosts.
Who decides whether Meta pays?
Minister Marco Aurélio Bellizze, the TSE judge handling the case, decides. The prosecutor’s opinion is advice and does not bind him.
When is Brazil’s runoff?
Brazilians vote on Sunday 25 October, three days after this opinion. The runoff is between Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro.
Sources: Poder360, 22 October 2026; A Rede, 22 October 2026; ICL Notícias, 22 October 2026; Esportes & Notícias, 22 October 2026; Kalshi, 22 October 2026.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error · Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief