IBOV 168,498.45 ▲ 1.39% IPC MEX 71,393.57 ▲ 0.43% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.51▼ 0.03% USD/MXN18.59▼ 0.18% USD/CLP 975.74 — 0.00% USD/COP3,240▲ 0.03% USD/PEN3.44▼ 0.08% USD/ARS1,545▼ 0.03% USD/UYU40.31▲ 3.23% USD/PYG6,358▲ 6.40% USD/BOB11.81▲ 0.77% USD/DOP60.62▲ 4.10% USD/CRC448.27▲ 2.01% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.17% USD/HNL26.88▲ 3.19% USD/NIO 36.62 — 0.00% USD/VES895.29▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.83▲ 2.67% USD/TTD6.72▲ 2.44% EUR/BRL6.14▼ 0.57% BRENT 97.36 ▼ 0.98% WTI 90.31 ▼ 0.57% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.28 ▲ 1.06% GOLD 4,081 ▲ 0.14% SILVER 52.19 ▲ 0.74% SOY 1,194 ▲ 1.08% CORN 441.50 ▲ 0.34% WHEAT 591.25 ▼ 1.34% COFFEE 280.15 ▲ 1.08% SUGAR 18.25 ▼ 1.67% ORANGE JUICE 130.55 ▲ 1.63% COTTON 78.54 ▼ 0.22% COCOA 5,119 ▼ 1.20% BEEF 214.05 ▼ 0.16% CATTLE 318.38 ▼ 2.05% LITHIUM 60.91 ▲ 1.21% PETR4 45.36 — 0.00% VALE3 64.04 — 0.00% ITUB4 40.53 — 0.00% BBDC4 14.20 — 0.00% ABEV3 15.48 — 0.00% BBAS3 17.13 — 0.00% B3SA3 14.39 — 0.00% WEGE3 48.19 — 0.00% PRIO3 60.48 — 0.00% SUZB3 53.40 ▲ 2.12% RENT3 30.29 — 0.00% AZZA3 14.76 ▲ 4.98% CSAN3 2.77 — 0.00% RAIZ4 28.00 ▲ 2.56% PCAR3 2.40 ▲ 0.42% GMAT3 3.80 — 0.00% PSSA3 44.35 ▲ 1.46% CVCB3 0.84 ▲ 2.44% POSI3 3.09 ▼ 0.64% SLCE3 16.61 ▲ 1.59% NATU3 5.17 — 0.00% BRKM5 3.20 — 0.00% RANI3 8.53 ▲ 0.83% CSNA3 4.41 — 0.00% IBOV 168,498.45 ▲ 1.39% IPC MEX 71,393.57 ▲ 0.43% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.51 ▼ 0.03% USD/MXN 18.61 ▼ 0.10% USD/CLP 975.74 — 0.00% USD/COP 3,240 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.44 ▼ 0.08% USD/ARS 1,545 ▼ 0.03% USD/UYU 40.31 ▲ 3.23% USD/PYG 6,358 ▲ 6.40% USD/BOB 11.81 ▲ 0.77% USD/DOP 60.61 ▲ 4.08% USD/CRC 448.27 ▲ 2.01% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.17% USD/HNL 26.88 ▲ 3.19% USD/NIO 36.62 — 0.00% USD/VES 895.29 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.83 ▲ 2.67% USD/TTD 6.72 ▲ 2.44% EUR/BRL 6.14 ▼ 0.57% BRENT 97.36 ▼ 0.98% WTI 90.31 ▼ 0.57% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.28 ▲ 1.06% GOLD 4,081 ▲ 0.14% SILVER 52.19 ▲ 0.74% SOY 1,194 ▲ 1.08% CORN 441.50 ▲ 0.34% WHEAT 591.25 ▼ 1.34% COFFEE 280.15 ▲ 1.08% SUGAR 18.25 ▼ 1.67% ORANGE JUICE 130.55 ▲ 1.63% COTTON 78.54 ▼ 0.22% COCOA 5,119 ▼ 1.20% BEEF 214.05 ▼ 0.16% CATTLE 318.38 ▼ 2.05% LITHIUM 60.91 ▲ 1.21% PETR4 45.36 — 0.00% VALE3 64.04 — 0.00% ITUB4 40.53 — 0.00% BBDC4 14.20 — 0.00% ABEV3 15.48 — 0.00% BBAS3 17.13 — 0.00% B3SA3 14.39 — 0.00% WEGE3 48.19 — 0.00% PRIO3 60.48 — 0.00% SUZB3 53.40 ▲ 2.12% RENT3 30.29 — 0.00% AZZA3 14.76 ▲ 4.98% CSAN3 2.77 — 0.00% RAIZ4 28.00 ▲ 2.56% PCAR3 2.40 ▲ 0.42% GMAT3 3.80 — 0.00% PSSA3 44.35 ▲ 1.46% CVCB3 0.84 ▲ 2.44% POSI3 3.09 ▼ 0.64% SLCE3 16.61 ▲ 1.59% NATU3 5.17 — 0.00% BRKM5 3.20 — 0.00% RANI3 8.53 ▲ 0.83% CSNA3 4.41 — 0.00%
since 2009
Monday, November 9, 2026

The Chilean Army doubts the success of modernizing the Leopard tank

By · · 5 min read

The Proaco project is the strategic program of the Chilean Army that aims to recover the capacities of its armored material affected by technical and logistical obsolescence.

In 2020, the Factories and Maestranzas of the Army (Famae) directly received the contract to formulate and execute this project structured in two phases.

The first corresponds to the development of a first unit that, once accepted, would be passed, in a different contract, to the second stage, which corresponds to the gradual implementation by annual payments in all the intervened fleets.

Free daily brief — no card needed
Get every Defense Monitor story in one morning email
We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.

Read also: Check out our coverage on Chile

The material to be modernized is the fire control system (SCF) of the Leopard 2 A4 tank, the observation and aiming system of the Marder 1 A3 armored car, the internal communications of the entire Chilean armored fleet, and the control system of fire (SCF) of the M109 self-propelled howitzer.

The Chilean Army doubts the success of modernizing the Leopard tank
Leopard 2 A4 tank
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

More than two years after the start of the project, Famae has only made progress in the first units for the observation and aiming of the Marder 1 A3 armored car and in internal communications, with contracts to OIP Land Systems (Belgium) and Aselsan (Turkey), respectively, whose progress is still very slow and without concrete results to date for a contract signed a year ago.

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Paraguay's Senate ousts its president after a bank failure”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

While the solution for the SCF of the M109 material is under development through the subsidiary of Famae, Servicios y Soluciones Tecnológicas S.A. (S2T), rejecting the initial option with the Chilean company Desarrollos de Automatización (Desa).

DELAY IN THE MODERNIZATION OF THE SCF OF THE LEOPARD 2 A4

However, the most important subproject of Proaco and that corresponds to the renewal of the SCF of the Leopard 2 A4 tank is still in total uncertainty at its start.

The bidding process carried out by Famae is entangled by challenges made to the Comptroller General of the Republic by the Israeli company Elbit Systems, based on its exclusion from the new ongoing process.

Let us remember that initially, Famae, in 2021, had accepted Elbit’s offer.

But it was the Ministry of National Defense who objected to the selected solution for the Army since it could be verified that the technical solution of the Israeli firm was very similar to the modernization under development for Argentina in the modernization of its TAM tanks, which should have been an exclusive condition according to the Chilean Ministry of Defense and which was not considered at the time by Famae.

According to internal sources at Famae, the process has had monthly postponements since February 28 of this year, pending a response from the Comptroller General regarding the challenges made by Elbit.

Sources of interest from the Chilean Army estimate that it is only a self-imposed condition by the management of Famae to avoid future administrative responsibilities that the Comptroller General could observe by Elbit’s claim, which would show once again that the bidding processes carried out in the Proaco project have lacked technical and administrative rigor, otherwise, it could be understood that Famae would not be in the current scenario of criticism.

All this also bogs down the progress of the first unit contracts for OIP Land Systems and Aselsan, since their solutions must necessarily be compatible with the new SCF of the Leopard 2 A4 tank.

For OIP LS there must be functionality between the two in the simulators and for Aselsan, the need to apply the compatibility and electromagnetic interference tests, so that they are functional with each other.

It is also added that what was contracted to OIP LS and Aselsan, despite being defined as a “first unit” of the solution, is being executed in practice as “prototypes” and not existing solutions in operation, which has led to longer times than expected contractually agreed and strangely under the consent of Famae since for obviousness the tests, corrections and validations must be executed.

While in the case of the solution of the SCF of the Leopard 2 A4 tank, an attempt is made to avoid this error, and in the new technical bases, they are much more specific when requiring that the offer presented by the interested companies be a solution that currently exists in operation in said material.

The delay in decision-making and avoidable errors in Famae’s internal processes have caused delays that have a transversal effect on the entire project. Also, this delay could be collaterally affecting the project’s budget since, due to the war in Ukraine, costs and logistical times have increased in the defense sector.

Given the facts, we can objectively conclude that Famae has been inefficient in timely specifying its contractual commitment with the Chilean Army, which has altered the schedule for this weapon.

On the other hand, and according to internal Army sources, the success of the Proaco project as Famae is developing it is viewed with great skepticism and that, without radical changes in its management, an unsatisfactory result is in sight, which would be very unfortunate when considering the immense amount of resources provided for this strategic project of the branch of the Chilean land force.

COMPLEX TASK FOR THE IDIC

The Army Research and Control Institute (IDIC), as the technical receiving body for everything that the Chilean Army acquires for itself, already visualizes the complexities indicated in the development of this first phase.

and specifically regarding the functional interaction between the different types of material intervened, its main objective being to ensure the Army that what has been put into operation in Proaco has the desired systemic functionality, a complex task since it must verify its compliance with a Famae that to date has not been up to the task desired.

The preceding deepens the uncertainty of Famae’s actions due to the fact that there are currently reasonable doubts of the Army regarding the effectiveness in executing its current maintenance contracts.

The modality started more than a decade ago is quite degraded in its management, even though there has been a strong investment of resources during the period and that, added to a special maintenance program type F6 with additional resources to the annual ones, have not given the expected results in terms of material availability battleship.

Finally, the defense sector has also criticized the passivity that the Chilean Army has had by not making use of the contractual conditions with Famae to demand what is convenient or in making the decision to use its own procurement agencies and what is desired progress according to schedule.

With information from Infodefensa

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.