IBOV 171,977.92 ▲ 2.41% IPSA 11,345.41 ▲ 0.96% IPC MEX 65,223.89 ▲ 1.36% MERVAL 2,931,172 ▲ 1.92% COLCAP 2,454.74 ▲ 0.43% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 1.62% USD/BRL5.15▼ 1.01% USD/MXN16.90▼ 0.35% USD/CLP915.30▼ 0.74% USD/COP3,043▼ 0.27% USD/PEN3.34▼ 0.33% USD/ARS1,497▼ 0.05% USD/UYU40.20▲ 1.58% USD/PYG5,996▲ 1.55% USD/BOB11.43▲ 0.41% USD/DOP58.82▲ 0.20% USD/CRC450.05▲ 3.34% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.21% USD/HNL26.81▲ 0.31% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.29% USD/VES778.00▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.79% EUR/BRL6.01▼ 0.47% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 171,977.92 ▲ 2.41% IPSA 11,345.41 ▲ 0.96% IPC MEX 65,223.89 ▲ 1.36% MERVAL 2,931,172 ▲ 1.92% COLCAP 2,454.74 ▲ 0.43% BVL PERÚ 58,698.13 ▲ 1.62% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Friday, August 21, 2026

Brazil will lose US$6.12 billion in 2023 with a deficit of silos, estimates Cogo

By · May 5, 2023 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

Record crops and a high grain storage deficit in Brazil have pressured soybean and corn premiums to negative levels in relation to the international market, which indicates losses for the country’s production chain of R$30.5 billion (US$6.12 billion) in 2023, estimated on Thursday (4) the consulting firm Cogo Intelligence in Agribusiness.

Of the total losses, soybeans would be responsible for about R$19 billion (US$3.81 billion) and corn for R$11.5 billion (US$2.31 billion), Cogo pointed out.

The values were obtained considering the negative premiums – in the case of soybeans, the worst in about 20 years – and the shipments already made and expected for the coming months.

A truck unloads corn in Sorriso, Mato Grosso, Brazil (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Infrastructure bottlenecks, which include port flow channels, have also been cited by sugar market players as risk factors for sugar exports.

The situation of warehouses in the country, which for the first time in 20 years harvested more in the summer harvest than the total storage capacity, was addressed in early January in a Reuters report, which also warned about the need for more investments to accommodate the growth of agriculture.

With the record harvest, slow sales by producers, and a storage deficit of 124 million tonnes, considering this year’s harvest estimated at 313 million tonnes, there was the formation of a “perfect storm,” noted the consulting firm’s partner-director, Carlos Cogo, during an event with journalists.

Besides the structural issue (the storage deficit), he highlighted the conjunctural factor.

“Producers sold little soybeans in advance last year.”

“When it came to harvest (this year) they had less than a third of the crop sold, the lowest volume of anticipated sales in the last eight harvests,” he said;

He recalls the slowness of business was associated with a rise in costs that interfered with the farmers’ strategy.

Cogo observed that it is natural that the premium concerning the quotations negotiated in the Chicago exchange is lower during the harvest, especially with a record harvest like the Brazilian one.

But he attributed storage a preponderant importance since farmers could hold their products in warehouses without accepting any price if there was capacity.

In April, there was a record low for premiums in Brazil, which hit -US$2.10/ bushel, with the monthly average at -US$1.90/bushel.

“That had only happened in 2004,” he said, adding that the differentials are at -US$1.50/bushel for May shipments.

“We are with negative premiums until August, something that is also not unprecedented but very rare,” he said.

He explains that the differentials get weaker to compensate for problems in loading, payment of fines for delays in shipments, and waiting time at ports, among other factors.

He said that this structural factor of the storage deficit would remain and “show its worst face in the corn harvest” – the second cereal crop arrives in the market between June and July – but it should also continue next year.

IDLENESS IN THE INDUSTRY

While the static storage capacity in Brazil has been growing at a rate of 2.8% a year, the agricultural production has advanced 5.5% in the last years, Cogo said, commenting that closing the silos/production gap is not an easy task.

The industry can produce silos to receive a little more than 5 million tonnes of grain per year, below the levels of the advance of agricultural production – considering only soybean; the crop will grow in 2022/23 to more than 20 million tonnes.

Still, the silos industry has been working with idle capacity, even after investments in recent years to expand factories, according to executives from Kepler Weber, the leader in the production of warehouses in the country.

“Today we are working around 30% idleness, competitors are working with more, there is the news of collective vacations (in the industries),” said the financial director of Kepler Weber, Paulo Polezi, citing economic issues.

“It’s a big dichotomy, the (agricultural) flows exploding and the companies with idle capacity,” he added.

According to Kepler Weber executives, Brazil would need policies that stimulate the expansion of warehouses in the long term as part of the solution to the problem.

With information from Forbes

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.