ANALYSIS · BRAZIL
Key Facts
- Power Index Brazil ranks 1st of 14 in The Rio Times Latin America Power Index, with 75.0 points (October 2026 edition).
- What is happening Brazil’s Supreme Court is testing a presidential decree, signed on Friday, 25 September, that banned online sports betting and casino games, and held a public hearing on it on Tuesday, 3 November.
- Why it matters The outcome decides whether a market licensed under a 2023 law stays closed, and whether football clubs lose betting sponsors that help fund their budgets and Olympic sports.
- The numbers Operators had to go offline by 5 October, Congress has 120 days to confirm the decree, and Flamengo claims up to BRL 430 million (about US$79 million) in yearly losses.
- Who is who Justice Luiz Fux steers the cases; the Attorney General’s Office defends the ban; the ANJL, an industry group, and clubs such as Flamengo and Fluminense challenge it.
- What to watch Fux’s ruling on suspending the decree, any deal on a longer transition for clubs and sponsors, and whether Congress confirms the measure.
- What it means for you Brazilian betting sites stay offline for everyone while the decree stands, and investors in global betting groups such as FanDuel owner Flutter wait on the court.
Brazil’s betting ban is a presidential decree under attack at the Supreme Court. Here is who wants what, what is at stake and how it could end.
Brazil’s online betting ban is a presidential decree that the Supreme Court is now testing. A public hearing on Tuesday, 3 November 2026, put the government, football clubs and the industry in one room.
This guide explains the legal terms, the two camps and the money at stake. It also sets out the paths the court could take, without predicting which it will choose.
The Legal Terms in Plain English
- Provisional measure: a presidential decree that takes effect at once and lapses unless Congress confirms it within 120 days.
- Fixed-odds betting: bets placed at odds set in advance, such as sports bets and online casino games, known in Brazil as “bets”.
- ADI: a direct action of unconstitutionality, the lawsuit used to ask the Supreme Court to strike down a law or decree.
- Rapporteur: the justice who steers a case through the court, here Luiz Fux.
- Amicus curiae: an outside group admitted to give the court its view, as several clubs have asked to be.
How Brazil Went From Regulation to a Ban
Congress passed Law 14,790 in 2023 to license and tax betting. The Supreme Court held a hearing on that law in November 2024, with more than 50 experts and representatives.
On Friday, 25 September 2026, President Lula signed Provisional Measure 1,394, which bans fixed-odds betting and ends the operators’ authorisations. Operators were told to take their sites offline by Monday, 5 October.
Operators and the ANJL then filed 19 lawsuits in federal courts and won no injunction. The authorisations lost validity on Sunday, 25 October.
In late October Fux left the decree in force and called the public hearing. The court published the speaker list on 27 and 28 October.
Who Wants What
Two broad camps spoke at the hearing, though the legal picture is more tangled than a simple split. Their arguments differ on health, money and the rule of law.
- Government: Lula, the Justice Ministry and the Attorney General’s Office say betting harms health and families and sits too close to organised crime.
- Industry: the ANJL and the Brazilian Responsible Gaming Institute (IBJR) say licensed firms paid for authorisations that a decree cancelled overnight.
- Clubs: Flamengo, Fluminense and others say betting sponsors fund their budgets and Olympic sports, and they ask at least for a longer transition.
- Challengers of the 2023 law: the Prosecutor-General and the commerce confederation CNC filed cases against the law itself, so the dispute is not only industry against government.
What Is at Stake for Clubs, Workers and Bettors
Flamengo says the ban could cost it up to BRL 430 million (about US$79 million) a year and threaten 1,200 jobs. These are the club’s own estimates, and no independent check has been published.
Fluminense’s representative said ten days was too short to adapt contracts. Clubs say they signed their betting sponsorships under a law Congress had passed.
The government says the ban protects health, families and public security. Justice Minister Wellington César Lima e Silva told the hearing that betting has an undesirable closeness to money laundering.
How the Court Could Rule
This is an assessment of the options before Fux, not a forecast. He can keep the decree in force, suspend it, or steer the sides toward a compromise.
Keeping it in force leaves betting sites closed while Congress decides. Suspending it would let licensed operators return, at least for a time.
One Brazilian report says Fux called the hearing partly to explore a deal between the government, the industry and the clubs. The clubs’ main ask is a longer transition if the decree is not revoked.
What Congress Can Do
Congress can confirm the decree, change it or let it lapse after 120 days, a clock that pauses during recess. If it lapses, the decree loses force.
The court’s ruling and the vote in Congress run on separate tracks. Either one can reshape the other.
What It Means for You
For US readers, Brazil matters because Flutter, the New York-listed owner of FanDuel, has said it left the market. Investors in global betting groups are waiting on the court.
Visitors and residents cannot use licensed betting sites or apps in Brazil while the decree stands. The decree also bans advertising of fixed-odds betting.
What Is Not Known
There is no date for Fux’s ruling on suspending the decree. It is also open whether the court will rule on the 2023 law as well as the decree.
Court notices list 26 and then 28 entities, and reports differ on how many spoke. No independent study has yet tested the clubs’ job and revenue claims.
What Comes Next
Fux must rule on the request to suspend the decree, and Congress must act within its 120-day window. The report on the hearing itself covers what each side said on Tuesday.
Earlier reports cover the government’s reply to Fux, the clubs’ lawsuit and the Stake ruling. The Brazil hub, the Rio de Janeiro city page and Brazil Elections 2026 add context.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a provisional measure in Brazil?
It is a presidential decree with immediate force of law. It lapses unless Congress confirms it within 120 days.
Why is the Supreme Court involved in the betting ban?
Industry groups, the Prosecutor-General and others filed cases asking whether the decree or the 2023 betting law is constitutional. Justice Luiz Fux is the rapporteur.
Is the betting ban in force today?
Yes, Fux has left the decree in force while he weighs a request to suspend it. Operators had to go offline by 5 October.
Could online betting come back to Brazil?
It could if the court suspends the decree, if Congress lets it lapse, or if a deal changes the terms. None of that has happened yet.
What does Flamengo say it stands to lose?
Its vice-president told the hearing it could lose up to BRL 430 million (about US$79 million) a year and 1,200 jobs. Those are the club’s own estimates.
Sources: Federal Supreme Court, hearing notice, 27 October 2026; Federal Supreme Court, hearing schedule and related cases, 28 October 2026; Brazilian reporting of 26 October to 3 November 2026 (all accessed 3 November 2026).
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error · Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief
Brazil runoff, Sunday, October 25: Brazil runoff: date, poll closing times and when results start. Latest: Brazil runoff polls, Flávio 51%, Lula 49%.