IBOV 175,135.41 ▲ 0.31% IPSA 11,470.79 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 66,090.98 ▼ 0.15% MERVAL 3,001,209 ▼ 0.79% COLCAP 2,489.80 ▼ 0.59% BVL PERÚ 60,629.82 ▲ 0.25% USD/BRL5.14▼ 0.41% USD/MXN16.97▼ 0.07% USD/CLP926.00▲ 0.47% USD/COP3,150▲ 1.82% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.07% USD/ARS1,512▼ 0.15% USD/UYU40.25▲ 1.53% USD/PYG5,905▲ 0.48% USD/BOB11.65▲ 2.81% USD/DOP58.25▲ 0.75% USD/CRC448.38▲ 1.62% USD/GTQ7.63▲ 2.37% USD/HNL26.83▲ 1.77% USD/NIO36.62▼ 0.02% USD/VES789.69▼ 0.08% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.73▲ 1.14% EUR/BRL6.01▲ 0.17% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 175,135.41 ▲ 0.31% IPSA 11,470.79 ▲ 0.89% IPC MEX 66,090.98 ▼ 0.15% MERVAL 3,001,209 ▼ 0.79% COLCAP 2,489.80 ▼ 0.59% BVL PERÚ 60,629.82 ▲ 0.25% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Friday, August 28, 2026

Brazil Politics - Brazil

PSOL Wants Annulment of Decree Creating Citizen’s Database in Brazil

By · October 25, 2019 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – A Legislative Decree Bill (PDL) submitted by PSOL (Socialism and Freedom Party) in the Chamber of Deputies calls for annulment of the decree.

Submitted on Tuesday, October 22nd, PDL 675/2019 proposes to overturn the effects of Decree 10,046/2019, signed by President Jair Bolsonaro. The government’s text establishes rules for the sharing of citizen data between public entities.

The presidential decree establishing the Citizen’s Database may suffer a setback in Congress. (Photo: Internet Reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Justifying its proposal, the PSOL states that the Citizen’s Database decree “fails in its regulatory role by generating legal uncertainty regarding the protection of personal data within the scope of the public administration”.

The government wants a database that includes data such as the tax identification number (CPF), name and date of birth, fingerprints, voice, and way of walking.

According to the PSOL, the system could become “a dangerous tool under the administration of authoritarian bias management or one that seeks to monitor or repress opponents”.

The party also states that gathering so much data in just one place increases vulnerability. “Centralization also poses problems with regard to the security of citizens’ information, which may contain real files on their private lives,” it said.

PSOL notes violation of the LGPD in the decree

The presidential decree is also in violation of the General Data Protection Law (LGPD Law 13.709/2018), according to the PSOL.

The party claims that the text disregards certain provisions in the law, such as the citizens’ informational self-determination, respect for human rights, the free development of personality, dignity and the exercise of citizenship by natural persons.

“In creating the definition of ‘registration data’, the decree disregards not only the definition of personal data in the LGPD, but also the specificity of sensitive personal data, i.e., those related to racial or ethnic origin, religious conviction, political opinion, union membership or religious, philosophical or political organization, health or sex life, genetic or biometric data”.

The party also argues that the Citizen’s Database is incompatible with the principle established by the LGPD. It prevents, for instance, a photo used in the CNH (National Driver’s License) from being used in security systems with facial recognition.

“As it stands, the decree does not allow determining how data will be shared for purposes other than those for which the individual has given his or her consent at the time the information is collected, or how he or she will be informed of its use”.

Conflict between data protection agencies

The proposal to overturn the presidential decree also criticizes the Central Data Management Committee. The group, which will be made up exclusively of members linked to the federal executive branch, will be required to define rules for the sharing of data between public bodies.

The government wants a database that includes data such as the tax identification number (CPF), name and date of birth, fingerprints, voice, and way of walking. (Photo: Internet Reproduction)

The PSOL challenges the absence of other sectors of society in the committee’s debates and states that the group has conflicting competencies with those of the National Data Protection Authority (ANPD).

“The work of the committee provided for in the decree should be secondary to the guidelines issued by the central body [ANPD]”.

This is not the only proposal to annul the decree establishing the Citizen’s Database. PDL 661/2019, proposed by deputy André Figueiredo, was submitted on the same day the presidential text was published and its purpose is the same as that of the PSOL decree.

Figueiredo’s proposal, however, is more advanced and has already been forwarded for review to the Chamber’s committees. The PSOL’s proposal, in turn, is still at the Steering Committee, which will recommend which committees it will pass through.

 

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.