The Energy Ministry suggests that Brazil won’t have daylight saving time in 2023. A recent report from the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper supports this claim.
Officials say current energy plans are robust, assuring reliable power.
Brazil is entering its hottest period with ample hydroelectric reserves. These reserves help in supplying affordable, renewable energy like solar and wind.
In the past, daylight saving time started in October and ended in February. The goal was to use more natural light, thus conserving energy.
However, this practice was ended in 2019 by former President Jair Bolsonaro. Studies showed it didn’t save energy and could negatively affect health.
Changing social habits have also made the practice less useful. For instance, many people now use air conditioners extensively at home.
Last year, current President Lula conducted a poll on social media. The question was whether to bring back daylight saving time.
Of 2.3 million votes, 66.2% supported its return, while 33.8% said no.
Background
The daylight saving debate in Brazil has evolved over time. Initially, it was an energy-saving measure introduced in the 1930s.
In recent years, however, the need for it has been questioned. Technology and lifestyle changes have altered the equation.
For example, the widespread use of air conditioning negates some of the energy-saving benefits.
Moreover, health experts have raised concerns. Adjusting the clock might disrupt sleep patterns and even lead to health issues.
As Lula’s poll revealed, the government has to weigh these factors against the public opinion favoring the measure’s return.
Brazil’s situation also reflects a global trend. Many countries are re-evaluating the relevance of daylight saving time.
In the United States and parts of Europe, similar debates are ongoing.
Thus, the Brazilian government’s decision to likely skip daylight saving time in 2023 isn’t isolated.
It’s part of a larger discourse on whether this age-old practice still serves its intended purpose.
The issue may continue to polarize opinion, but the current stance is a nod to evolving realities.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
Read More from The Rio Times