IBOV 174,951.12 ▲ 0.21% IPSA 11,369.64 ▼ 0.71% IPC MEX 66,644.91 ▲ 0.53% MERVAL 3,019,891 ▲ 0.36% COLCAP 2,493.32 ▼ 0.60% BVL PERÚ 60,449.35 ▲ 0.24% USD/BRL5.15▲ 0.08% USD/MXN16.95— 0.00% USD/CLP921.24▲ 0.87% USD/COP3,123▲ 1.94% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.19% USD/ARS1,514▲ 0.12% USD/UYU40.18▲ 1.55% USD/PYG5,957▲ 0.99% USD/BOB11.50▲ 1.47% USD/DOP58.07▼ 0.41% USD/CRC450.21▲ 2.07% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.21% USD/HNL26.82▲ 0.34% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.09% USD/VES785.05▼ 0.19% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.73▲ 1.10% EUR/BRL6.00▼ 0.08% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 174,951.12 ▲ 0.21% IPSA 11,369.64 ▼ 0.71% IPC MEX 66,644.91 ▲ 0.53% MERVAL 3,019,891 ▲ 0.36% COLCAP 2,493.32 ▼ 0.60% BVL PERÚ 60,449.35 ▲ 0.24% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Opinion: A Tale of Two Courts

By · November 17, 2015 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

Opinion, by Michael Royster

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – The Curmudgeon pays attention to news concerning the Judicial Branch of both Brazil and the USA. He is happy to report that Brazil’s Supreme Court (STF) has been doing a better job of promoting democracy than its northerly counterpart SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States).

The Curmudgeon, aka Michael Royster.
The Curmudgeon, aka Michael Royster.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Consider campaign finance.

In 2010 SCOTUS declared unconstitutional a law that prohibited corporations from engaging in “electioneering communications”. The logic of the majority decision (5-4) was that corporations were persons, and enjoyed the constitutional right of free speech.

STF, on the other hand, has recently rendered two decisions completely contrary to the above logic. In September, an 8-3 decision flatly prohibited corporations from donating to election campaigns, saying corporations are not people, they can’t vote or be voted.

Last week, STF further decided (unanimously) to suspend a provision of a recent statute that permitted individual donations to political parties to be re-passed to individual candidates without specifying the donor. Once again, STF specified that transparence was essential in elections and that without it, democracy would suffer.

The difference in decisions can be viewed as a result of differing attitudes towards money. A majority of SCOTUS feels that corporate money is not in itself evil, whereas a majority of STF feels it is. Perhaps this difference has been generated by the latest scandals, where it has become clear that big Brazilian corporate donors contribute so as to receive big contracts.

In fairness, the SCOTUS decision in Citizens United did not overturn the prohibition against corporations making direct donations to parties or politicians; rather, it permitted financing broadcasts, using First Amendment protections. The Curmudgeon feels this is a distinction without a difference, since campaign broadcasts affect elections.

In short, STF has got it right: corporations are not real people, and should not have the same election rights as real people.

The Curmudgeon will emit more Smidgens opportunely.

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.