IBOV 179,722.48 ▲ 1.30% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,314.78 ▼ 0.18% MERVAL 3,049,455 ▲ 0.51% COLCAP 2,470.26 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,450.29 ▲ 0.11% USD/BRL5.15▼ 0.60% USD/MXN16.99▼ 0.01% USD/CLP936.45▲ 0.24% USD/COP3,155▼ 1.44% USD/PEN3.36▼ 0.17% USD/ARS1,513▲ 0.25% USD/UYU40.24▲ 0.68% USD/PYG5,873▲ 0.47% USD/BOB12.08▲ 3.98% USD/DOP58.56▲ 0.38% USD/CRC446.47▲ 1.09% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 1.63% USD/HNL26.84▲ 1.11% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.14% USD/VES799.17▲ 0.23% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.69▼ 0.06% EUR/BRL5.97▼ 0.66% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 179,722.48 ▲ 1.30% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,314.78 ▼ 0.18% MERVAL 3,049,455 ▲ 0.51% COLCAP 2,470.26 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,450.29 ▲ 0.11% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

China Europe and Russia

China Seeks WTO Arbitration Over EU Tariffs on Electric Vehicles

By · August 9, 2024 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

China has declared its intention to intensify its conflict with the European Union over the EU’s import tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.

China will take the matter to the World Trade Organization (WTO) for arbitration. Furthermore, this move underscores growing tension between the two economic giants.

The conflict revolves around trade practices and market access in the rapidly expanding EV sector.

The conflict began when the EU imposed provisional tariffs on Chinese EV imports. The EU cited concerns over illegal subsidies provided by the Chinese government.

Moreover, these subsidies allegedly gave Chinese companies an unfair competitive advantage.

China Seeks WTO Arbitration Over EU Tariffs on Electric Vehicles. (Photo Internet reproduction)
China Seeks WTO Arbitration Over EU Tariffs on Electric Vehicles. (Photo Internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Consequently, the EU imposed tariffs ranging from 17.4% to 38.1% on various Chinese EV brands. These brands include BYD, Geely, and SAIC.

China vehemently contested these tariffs, describing them as “naked protectionist behavior” and a violation of WTO rules.

A spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Commerce stated that the EU’s preliminary ruling lacked a legal foundation.

China called for the EU to “correct the wrongdoings” to maintain the stability of EV industrial chains. They also emphasized the importance of bilateral economic cooperation.

Chinese officials argue that the EU’s actions are unfair and hypocritical. They note that the EU itself provides substantial subsidies to its own EV and battery industries.

In addition, they claim that the tariffs disrupt global supply chain stability. Furthermore, they assert that these actions undermine market principles.

The imposition of these tariffs is significant, given the deep economic and trade ties between China and the EU.

China Seeks WTO Arbitration Over EU Tariffs on Electric Vehicles

Experts warn that the EU’s actions could trigger retaliatory measures from China. These measures could affect a wide range of European exports, including pork, dairy products, and luxury items like Cognac.

The EU’s decision comes at a critical time as it aims to electrify its automotive fleet. The goal is to phase out petrol and diesel-powered cars by 2035.

Nonetheless, European manufacturers have struggled to produce competitive electric models. Chinese EVs, being more affordable, make the EU market particularly vulnerable.

Nevertheless, despite escalating rhetoric, efforts to resolve the issue through dialogue continue.

Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and European Commission Executive Vice President Valdis Dombrovskis have committed to discussions.

They aim to find a mutually beneficial resolution. However, if these talks fail, the provisional tariffs will become permanent in November.

China’s decision to seek WTO arbitration highlights the complexities in international trade relations. This is especially true in high-stakes industries like electric vehicles.

Both China and the EU have much to gain from a cooperative resolution. However, the path forward remains fraught with economic and political hurdles.

Ultimately, the global market will closely observe how these two major players manage their trade dispute.

The broader implications for the EV industry and international trade norms are significant.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.