Malawi’s Central Bank Unlawfully Cut Pay. Now Comes the Bill
MALAWI · DOING BUSINESS
Key Facts
—The ruling: The Industrial Relations Court, Malawi’s specialist court for workplace disputes, found on 14 November 2025 that the Reserve Bank of Malawi could not unilaterally cut salaries that had already become contractual entitlements.
—The case: Matter IRC 803 of 2022 was brought by Clemence Chinkono, a former RBM director of administrative services. Deputy Chairperson Annie Zinenani Gumulira delivered the judgment.
—The cut: Chinkono’s monthly salary fell from MK12,046,436 (about US$6,900) to MK9,885,937 (about US$5,700), a reduction of about 18 percent, effective 30 December 2020.
—The remedy: The court awarded the amounts claimed plus interest, with damages for unfair labour practices to be assessed separately. The value of the claim has not been reported.
—The range in circulation: Malawian outlets report resulting payouts of about MK800 million (about US$460,000) to MK1.5 billion (about US$860,000). No source, document or agency is named for that range.
—What is confirmed: One payment is on the record. The Reserve Bank confirmed paying Deputy Governor Henry Mathanga MK1.5 billion (about US$860,000), under a consent order of 13 January 2026 in a separate case.
—What the bank has not said: The Reserve Bank has not commented on the November judgment, has not said whether it appealed, and has published no aggregate cost.
A Malawi Reserve Bank salary ruling delivered last November has become the legal basis for compensation claims by former and current executives. Malawian media put the resulting payouts between MK800 million (about US$460,000) and MK1.5 billion (about US$860,000), though only one payment has actually been confirmed and it arises from a different case.
What the Malawi Reserve Bank salary ruling decided
The Industrial Relations Court ruled on 14 November 2025 in a case brought by Clemence Chinkono, a former director of administrative services at the central bank, as Malawian media reported this week. Deputy Chairperson Annie Zinenani Gumulira delivered the judgment.
The finding was narrow and clear. The bank’s board had authority to set remuneration, but it could not unilaterally reduce salaries that had already become contractual entitlements.
The court described the conduct as a classic example of unfair labour practices. It awarded the amounts claimed with interest, and left damages to be assessed separately.
The sequence behind the dispute runs back to a 2018 functional review, after which the board approved a revised executive salary framework. The bank then revised salaries downward in December 2020, under then Governor Wilson Banda.
How large the cut was, and a contradiction inside the reporting
Chinkono’s monthly pay fell from MK12,046,436 (about US$6,900) to MK9,885,937 (about US$5,700) with effect from 30 December 2020. That is a reduction of about 18 percent.
The same articles that carry those figures also say executive salaries were cut by as much as 50 percent. Both statements sit in the same copy and are not reconciled.
The larger figure is consistent with a separately reported proposal to cut Deputy Governor Henry Mathanga’s pay from around MK22 million (about US$12,600) a month, but that proposal was blocked by injunction and belongs to a different case.
All dollar conversions in this article use the late-August 2026 rate of roughly 1,745 kwacha to the US dollar.
The billion-kwacha range has no author
Malawian outlets report payouts of roughly MK800 million (about US$460,000) to MK1.5 billion (about US$860,000) across affected officials. The phrasing used is that payouts are reported at that range, without naming a court record, an auditor, an agency or a reporter.
Ten names circulate as beneficiaries, including the deputy governor and several former senior executives. None is confirmed to have filed a claim, won an award or received money.
Only one payment is documented. Reserve Bank spokesperson Boston Maliketi Banda confirmed earlier in August that the bank paid Mathanga MK1.5 billion (about US$860,000), in compliance with a consent order of 13 January 2026 that reinstated him as deputy governor from 1 January, Malawi24 reported. A consent order is a settlement that both sides sign and a court then makes binding.
That order is a different legal instrument from the November judgment, and no source establishes a link between them. Malawian reporting has said the developments suggest a wider compensation dispute, which is an inference rather than a finding.
The awkward detail nobody has answered
Attorney General Frank Mbeta had publicly stated that Mathanga’s reinstatement ran from 1 January 2026 and carried no benefits before that date. The bank then paid a sum covering the period from his 2021 departure.
Neither the attorney general nor the bank has been quoted addressing that gap. Malawi24 also noted that MK1.5 billion (about US$860,000) spread over the roughly 57 months from March 2021 averages more than his stated monthly salary, and that the bank has not disclosed how the payment breaks down.
The Reserve Bank has said nothing publicly about the Chinkono judgment. It has not confirmed compliance, announced an appeal, or given a total.
Why this matters beyond one central bank
The judgment gave both sides 30 days to appeal to the High Court, a window that closed in mid-December 2025, yet the ruling is being reported as news nine months later with no explanation of what has happened since. That is a gap in the public record rather than a scandal in itself.
The fiscal context is what gives the story weight. Malawi is among the world’s poorest countries, debt service consumes more than half of domestic revenues, and foreign-exchange reserves have been running at less than a month of import cover.
Large court-ordered bills against Malawian public bodies are a recurring pattern rather than an aberration. The institutional lesson is about how decisions get made, not about the size of any one cheque.
The central bank is not funded from the national budget in the way a ministry is, so the framing that taxpayers are directly footing this bill is not established by any source. Where the money comes from is one of several unanswered questions.
What to watch
The first thing is whether the Reserve Bank appealed, and if not, what it has paid. Neither is public.
The second is whether any of the ten named officials has actually filed under the Chinkono precedent. Reporting so far uses the word reportedly throughout.
The third is whether an aggregate figure ever emerges. Until it does, the billion-kwacha range should be read as a press estimate rather than an accounting.
Frequently asked questions
What did the Malawi court rule?
The Industrial Relations Court found on 14 November 2025 that the Reserve Bank of Malawi could not unilaterally reduce salaries that had already become contractual entitlements. It described the conduct as unfair labour practice.
How much has been paid out?
Only one payment is confirmed. The Reserve Bank acknowledged paying Deputy Governor Henry Mathanga MK1.5 billion (about US$860,000) under a separate consent order of 13 January 2026.
Where does the MK800 million to MK1.5 billion range come from?
Malawian outlets report it, roughly US$460,000 to US$860,000, without naming a source, document or agency. It should be treated as a press estimate rather than a verified total.
Has the Reserve Bank responded?
It has not commented publicly on the November judgment, has not said whether it appealed, and has published no aggregate cost.
Connected Coverage
The same institution’s wider governance is in question in the state oil company that wired US$403,605 to fraudsters, and the country’s fiscal position in the US$150 million cash-transfer commitment from the Canva founders. More from the region sits on our Southern Africa hub.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
Part of our ongoing coverage
Africa: The New Scramble — the great-power contest over the continent.
Read More from The Rio Times