Malawi Cash Transfers: Canva Founders Commit $150 Million

MALAWI · SOCIETY

Malawi cash transfers funded by Canva’s billionaire founders have reached $150 million in committed money, powering the largest unconditional cash experiment ever attempted in a low-income country – and early results suggest the simplest form of aid may be among the most effective.

Who is behind the Malawi cash transfers

Cliff Obrecht and Melanie Perkins, the married co-founders of Australian design software giant Canva, have run the effort since 2021 through their Canva Foundation, in partnership with the nonprofit GiveDirectly. The couple committed $50 million between 2021 and 2023, then added a $100 million anchor pledge in October 2025.

That October gift is the largest single donation in GiveDirectly’s history. About $52.5 million has actually been delivered to Malawians since 2023, with the rest flowing over the next four years.

The pair built Canva into one of the world’s most valuable private software companies and have pledged the bulk of their fortune to philanthropy. The Malawi programme is the centrepiece of that promise.

How the programme works

The model is radical in its simplicity: identify the poorest adults and send them money by mobile phone, with no conditions attached. Recipients decide themselves whether to buy food, fix a roof, pay school fees or start a small business.

What began as a $10 million pilot has grown into the largest unconditional cash-transfer programme ever attempted in a low-income country. The new phase delivers about $550 per adult at district-wide scale, starting in Chiradzulu in southern Malawi, and aims to reach 185,000 people by early 2027.

GiveDirectly has spent over a decade testing the model across East Africa, building the mobile-money machinery that makes district-scale payments possible. Malawi is where that machinery now runs at full speed.

What the early numbers show

In the Khongoni area, where the programme paid every adult, GiveDirectly reported that 90 percent of recipients had risen above the extreme poverty line three months after receiving the cash. It also recorded a 48 percent drop in child mortality, a 27 percent fall in illness and a 23 percent rise in school enrolment.

Cash’s critics worry about local inflation, dependency and what happens when payments stop. GiveDirectly says its studies show little evidence of either problem so far, though the district-scale phase will be the sternest test yet.

Those figures come from the organisation’s own monitoring and will face sterner academic tests as the programme scales. Still, they echo a decade of research suggesting direct cash outperforms many traditional forms of aid, per GiveDirectly.

Why Malawi, and why now

Malawi is one of the world’s poorest countries, with most of its population living on smallholder farms vulnerable to drought and fertiliser prices. It is also stable and largely peaceful, making it a workable laboratory for district-scale delivery.

The timing is pointed. Traditional aid budgets have been slashed across the West, and tens of thousands of Malawian migrants have recently returned home from South Africa under the pressure of anti-immigrant campaigns, adding strain to rural households.

The stakes reach beyond one country. If district-scale cash works in Malawi, advocates argue, it offers a template for dozens of low-income countries where aid is shrinking and poverty is concentrated in the countryside.

A debate Latin America knows well

Readers in our home region will recognise the argument. Brazil’s Bolsa Família showed a generation ago that direct payments to poor families can cut poverty at national scale, and cash-transfer programmes now run across Latin America.

Mexico, Colombia and half the region run their own conditional variants, and economists still argue over strings versus no strings. Malawi’s experiment lands squarely in that debate, on the no-strings side.

The Malawi experiment pushes the idea further: unconditional, universal within a district, and funded by private tech wealth rather than a state. If the results hold at scale, the case for cash as the default tool against extreme poverty gets much harder to ignore, per Billionaires.Africa.

Frequently asked questions