\n
— Federal Police flagged Fábio Luís Lula da Silva’s move to Spain as possible “flight from the country” linked to the INSS pension fraud probe, according to a sealed report sent to the Supreme Court
\n
— Defense admitted for the first time that Lulinha traveled to Portugal with detained lobbyist Antônio Camilo Antunes at the latter’s expense, but denies any involvement in INSS fraud or commercial partnership
\n
— Bank records show Lulinha moved R$19.5 million ($3.5 million) between 2022 and 2026, but no direct transfers from the lobbyist were found in his accounts
\n
\n
\n
\n
The Lulinha INSS investigation took a significant turn on Monday as defense lawyers publicly acknowledged for the first time that President Lula’s eldest son traveled to Portugal with the detained lobbyist at the center of Brazil’s largest pension fraud scandal. Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, known as Lulinha, filed a petition with the Supreme Court explaining his relationship with Antônio Camilo Antunes — the so-called “Careca do INSS” — while federal police documents flagged his move to Spain as a potential attempt to evade the investigation. The Rio Times, the Latin American financial news outlet, examines both the prosecution’s evidence and the defense’s response in a case with major political implications for Brazil’s 2026 election year.
\n
\n
What the Lulinha INSS Investigation Alleges
\n
A sealed Federal Police technical report, sent to the Supreme Court in December to support the request for Lulinha’s bank secrecy records, outlined several threads connecting the president’s son to Antunes. The lobbyist, detained since September 2025, is accused of masterminding a multibillion-real scheme that skimmed illegal deductions from millions of retirees’ pension payments through fraudulent union associations. Police identified that Lulinha and Antunes traveled together to Madrid and Lisbon at least three times in 2024, with flight tickets purchased within minutes of each other.
\n
\n
\n
\n
A former employee of Antunes, Edson Claro, testified that the lobbyist claimed to pay Lulinha a monthly stipend of R$300,000 ($54,000). Seized messages between Antunes and businesswoman Roberta Luchsinger — described as the intermediary between the two men — referenced payments to “the boss’s son.” Police also found a seized envelope bearing Lulinha’s name during a search-and-seizure operation, prompting concerned messages between Luchsinger and Antunes. The police report states that Lulinha’s departure from Brazil “without a planned return denotes possible flight from the country, considering his association with the principal operator of billion-real fraud against millions of retirees.”
\n
\n
The Defense’s Response
\n
In Monday’s petition, Lulinha’s lawyers described his relationship with Antunes as “sporadic and social in nature.” They confirmed the Portugal trip in November 2024, explaining that Antunes — introduced to Lulinha through Luchsinger as a “successful pharmaceutical entrepreneur” — invited him to visit a medicinal cannabidiol production facility. Lulinha accepted because a niece uses CBD for medical treatment and he was curious about quality and availability issues, the defense said. The visit included a site where a factory would be built, but the business venture never materialized and Lulinha received no funds from Antunes, according to the petition.
\n
On the flight allegation, the defense said Lulinha began planning a move to Madrid in 2024 and contacted Spanish schools for his children in March 2025 — one month before the first phase of Operation Sem Desconto was launched in April 2025. The lawyers emphasized that the Supreme Court-authorized bank secrecy review found no direct transfers from Antunes to Lulinha’s accounts. Lulinha’s financial records showed R$19.5 million ($3.5 million) in transactions across more than 1,500 banking operations between 2022 and 2026, but none traceable to the INSS fraud network.
\n
\n
Political and Legal Stakes
\n
The case sits at the intersection of criminal law and electoral politics. The congressional INSS inquiry (CPMI) voted to break Lulinha’s bank and phone secrecy, but STF Justice Flávio Dino suspended those measures in early March, citing insufficient justification. CPMI president Carlos Viana said Monday that investigators had no time to analyze the data before the suspension, leaving the question of Lulinha’s involvement unresolved. Police have explicitly stated that no evidence of direct participation in the pension fraud has been established so far, and that the investigation remains at a preliminary verification stage. President Lula has said publicly that he will not intervene on his son’s behalf. With Brazil heading into a pivotal election cycle, both government and opposition are acutely aware that the Lulinha INSS investigation’s trajectory could shape the political landscape well beyond the courtroom.
For context on how the scandal threatens Lula’s 2026 campaign, see our full analysis of the Lulinha affair.
Read More from The Rio Times