IBOV 177,418.78 ▲ 1.00% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,430.32 ▼ 0.08% MERVAL 3,033,848 — 0.00% COLCAP 2,425.08 ▼ 1.33% BVL PERÚ 59,928.30 ▼ 0.80% USD/BRL5.19▲ 0.15% USD/MXN16.99▼ 0.04% USD/CLP939.10▲ 0.52% USD/COP3,223▲ 0.68% USD/PEN3.36▼ 0.14% USD/ARS1,509▼ 0.28% USD/UYU40.29▲ 0.05% USD/PYG5,892▼ 0.13% USD/BOB11.84▲ 0.51% USD/DOP58.61▲ 0.46% USD/CRC446.47▼ 0.04% USD/GTQ7.62▼ 0.02% USD/HNL26.84— 0.00% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.14% USD/VES796.33▲ 0.29% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.69▼ 0.37% EUR/BRL6.02▲ 0.19% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 177,418.78 ▲ 1.00% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,430.32 ▼ 0.08% MERVAL 3,033,848 — 0.00% COLCAP 2,425.08 ▼ 1.33% BVL PERÚ 59,928.30 ▼ 0.80% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Tuesday, September 1, 2026

Chile Weighs Major Corporate Tax Cut Despite Revenue Concerns

By · March 27, 2025 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

An analysis by the College of Accountants reveals that presidential candidate Evelyn Matthei’s proposal to slash Chile’s corporate tax rate would position the country among the OECD’s lowest tax jurisdictions.

The proposed reduction from 27% to 18% over a decade would transform Chile’s tax competitiveness dramatically. Chile currently maintains the tenth highest corporate tax rate among OECD members.

The current 27% rate sits well above the OECD average of 23.2%. Matthei’s planned reduction would vault Chile to the fourth lowest position in the organization, joining fiscally competitive countries like Ireland and Lithuania.

The government simultaneously pursues its own tax reform effort. Finance Minister Mario Marcel aims to reduce the corporate rate to 24% or potentially lower through various legislative proposals.

These efforts faced a significant setback when opposition coalition Chile Vamos rejected any compensatory tax increases. Juan Alberto Pizarro, head of the College of Accountants’ tax commission, warns about the fiscal implications.

Chile Weighs Major Corporate Tax Cut Despite Revenue Concerns
Chile Weighs Major Corporate Tax Cut Despite Revenue Concerns. (Photo Internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Chile’s Tax Debate

The positive economic growth effects would likely fail to offset the substantial public revenue losses from such a dramatic rate reduction. Matthei acknowledges implementation challenges ahead.

She stated the plan “requires a complex design of reductions, subject to growth, spending efficiency, and collection efficiency.” The feasibility depends on finding alternative revenue sources or implementing spending cuts.

Chile’s tax-to-GDP ratio already sits at just 20.6%, significantly below the OECD average of 33.9%. This places the country 37th out of 38 member states in terms of tax collection capacity. Any major revenue reduction creates additional fiscal sustainability challenges.

The current tax system provides some differentiation. Large companies pay 27% under the partially integrated system, while small and medium enterprises enjoy a reduced 25% rate. The opposition’s proposal would flatten this structure significantly.

Chile’s economy shows signs of resilience with growth recovering to 2.4% in 2024. Projections indicate solid performance at 2.3% in 2025 and 2.1% in 2026. Matthei and other candidates must balance growth incentives against vital public revenue needs as the presidential race intensifies.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.