IBOV 171,906.72 ▲ 0.51% IPSA 11,537.98 ▲ 1.76% IPC MEX 65,770.85 ▲ 0.06% MERVAL 2,995,129 ▲ 2.81% COLCAP 2,510.72 ▲ 2.09% BVL PERÚ 60,222.25 ▼ 0.17% USD/BRL5.15▲ 0.02% USD/MXN16.94▼ 0.04% USD/CLP911.58▼ 0.14% USD/COP3,057▲ 0.42% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.01% USD/ARS1,509▲ 0.63% USD/UYU40.18▼ 0.03% USD/PYG5,989▼ 0.11% USD/BOB11.44▲ 0.09% USD/DOP58.34▲ 0.64% USD/CRC446.05▼ 0.89% USD/GTQ7.62▼ 0.04% USD/HNL26.82▲ 0.02% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.58% USD/VES783.11▲ 0.53% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.72▲ 0.25% EUR/BRL6.01▲ 0.30% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 171,906.72 ▲ 0.51% IPSA 11,537.98 ▲ 1.76% IPC MEX 65,770.85 ▲ 0.06% MERVAL 2,995,129 ▲ 2.81% COLCAP 2,510.72 ▲ 2.09% BVL PERÚ 60,222.25 ▼ 0.17% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Brazil Politics - Brazil

Brazil’s electoral court TSE lists words to be banned from the vocabulary for alleged racism

By · December 10, 2022 · 4 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

On Nov. 30, during the meeting Democracy and Anti-racist Awareness in Electoral Justice, the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) launched the booklet “Racist Expressions: why avoid them”.

According to the organ, the purpose of the manual is to list words and expressions to be banned from the Brazilian vocabulary under the justification that the terms would be offensive to black people.

Words such as “enlighten”, “slave”, “half-ass” and “nega maluca”, as well as expressions such as “done on the thighs”, were pointed out as liable to exclusion.

In several cases, the booklet suggests different hypotheses that could support the supposed racism present in the words and expressions and, even without a faithful conclusion about the historical and cultural context of the terms, points to their banishment.

Many assume that this measure is about the adoption of US American strategies. The US is in a real race war. Is it now coming to Brazil?
Many assume that this measure is about the adoption of US American strategies. The US is in a real race war. Is it now coming to Brazil? (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

When pointing out reasons to stop using the word “half-ass”, for example, the TSE cites three possible explanations for the origin of the word, which contradict each other, and at the end, it states: “although there is no consensus about the origins, the possibility of being understood as a memory of slavery is sufficient justification for the expressions to be replaced”.

In defending the exclusion of the word “mulata” – which means a woman of mixed black and white races – the TSE mentions that “even if the expression does not have a notably racist origin as some defend, the uses and meanings that have been employed end up impregnating it with this sense. Thus, it deserves to be abandoned.

The production of the material was headed by the Commission of Racial Equality, created by TSE in April of this year to increase the participation of black people in the elections. However, the primer launched by the Electoral Justice has no connection with the electoral theme.
Historical inaccuracy and buzzwords are the justifications for part of the terms listed as prejudiced

There are 40 words and expressions labeled as racist, but the material remains open for updating with new terms.

Although the primer mentions terms that carry racist connotations, such as the pejorative use of “nigger service”, or “black man with a white soul”, there are several terms that the TSE itself recognizes that there is no guarantee of racial bias.

In justifying the inclusion of the word “nega maluca” – the popular name given to chocolate cake – to the list of “prohibited terms,” the TSE says that the word “depreciates the black woman because it associates her with a dessert.” “This mechanism hides the habit of undue sexualization of the black woman,” it says.

As for the word “boçal”, the manual mentions that, during the slavery period, the term was used to refer to enslaved people who could not speak Portuguese. In practice, there is no racist content in the word, but according to the TSE, “its use reminds us of a prejudiced origin that must be overcome.

To justify the exclusion of the expression “chuta que é macumba”, the primer says that its use disseminates the idea of “persecution and destruction of anything that can be associated with religions of African origin”.

The word “clarify” carries in itself the sense of opposition to the absence of light, which generates difficulty in seeing. But, according to the TSE, the word should also no longer be used, because it “embeds racism in it from the moment it conveys the idea that the understanding of something can only occur under the blessings of clarity, of whiteness, keeping black things in the field of doubt and ignorance.

Finally, in explaining why the expression “made on the thighs” should no longer be used, the booklet cites three hypothetical narratives for the term’s origin.

Only one of them points to a supposedly prejudiced connotation, which is that the term would be related to the colonial habit of producing tiles molded on the thighs of enslaved people.

However, as shown by Gazeta do Povo, in 2006, the architect José La Pastina Filho, who initially believed in this hypothesis, dismantled such myth by resorting to mathematics after spending four months traveling through the state of Santa Catarina in search of traditional tiles from old sheds.

“[…]We took the measurements of the thighs of a 1.80 m tall man and verified that, using it as a mold, it would only be possible to manufacture a tiny 36 cm long tile.”

“Without further concerns about aspects of human anatomy, if we establish a simple rule of three, we can verify that to manufacture a 77 cm tile [as the traditional one’s measure], we would need to count on a 3.85 m tall slave”, he wrote in the article that became famous, originally published in the UFPR Archaeology journal in 2006.

Even so, the TSE primer preferred to understand that “the everyday language usually associates it with the work of a black person, something of low quality, badly done.

Thus, the expression reproduces a racist idea and should be abandoned.”

Words to be banned, according to the Electoral Justice

See the list of all the words and expressions that have been targeted by the TSE:

A coisa tá preta
Dirty belly
Boçal
Bad hair
Chuta que é macumba!
Skin color
Bedside table
Creole
The color of sin
Denigrate
Day of white
Disputar a negra
Clarify
Slave
Ethnic print
Made on the thighs
Macumba’s chicken
Black humor
Inhaca
White envy
Lista negra
Macumbeiro
Black magic
Half-assed/half-assed
Black market
Mulata
Mulata tipo export
I’m not your negas!
Born with one foot in the kitchen
Crazy Nega
Black with fine features
Black with exotic beauty
Black with white soul
Black sheep
White soul nigga
When he ain’t in jail, he’s armed
Samba of the crazy nigga
Servicio de nigga
Teta de nega
Come back to the sea, offering!

With information from Gazeta do Povo

 

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.