IBOV 177,418.78 ▲ 1.00% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,048.39 ▼ 0.67% MERVAL 3,033,848 ▲ 1.83% COLCAP 2,425.08 ▼ 1.33% BVL PERÚ 59,928.30 ▼ 0.80% USD/BRL5.18▼ 0.21% USD/MXN16.99▼ 0.25% USD/CLP933.85▲ 0.25% USD/COP3,219▲ 0.60% USD/PEN3.36▲ 0.23% USD/ARS1,509▼ 0.28% USD/UYU40.29▲ 0.05% USD/PYG5,892▼ 0.13% USD/BOB11.84▲ 0.51% USD/DOP58.50▼ 0.19% USD/CRC446.47▼ 0.04% USD/GTQ7.62▼ 0.02% USD/HNL26.84— 0.00% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES796.33▲ 0.29% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.69▼ 0.37% EUR/BRL6.02▼ 0.20% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 177,418.78 ▲ 1.00% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,048.39 ▼ 0.67% MERVAL 3,033,848 ▲ 1.83% COLCAP 2,425.08 ▼ 1.33% BVL PERÚ 59,928.30 ▼ 0.80% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Tuesday, September 1, 2026

Brazil Covid-19

Covid-19: CoronaVac may offer reduced protection in HIV-positive individuals

By · November 20, 2021 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – A study suggests that the protection of CoronaVac – the principal vaccine against Covid-19 in Brazil- is lower among people infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. As a result, the vaccination guideline must be maintained, including priority for booster doses among this group.

Researchers at the University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP) compared the protection of CoronaVac in HIV-infected and non-infected people. The study showed that after being administered the CoronaVac, a person without HIV is 3.21 times more likely to develop antibodies against Covid-19 than an individual infected with the virus.

The study did not analyze the performance of other vaccines being used in Brazil. (photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

“It means that the response to the vaccine is somewhat poorer among people with HIV. It [the vaccine] is very important, but its power to generate response is lower in people with HIV compared to those without HIV,” said one of the study’s authors, USP School of Medicine professor Vivian Avelino-Silva.

Despite lower protection levels, this does not mean that people with HIV should not get vaccinated. According to the professor, the lower protection reinforces that this is a priority group and may need further strengthening of the vaccination scheme.

“It’s the kind of situation that clarifies that people with HIV should be prioritized. It suggests that perhaps people living with HIV need more boosters, earlier or in higher numbers, compared to people who don’t have HIV,” Vivian said.

The number of defense cells in the body, called CD4 cells, may help explain the difficulty in producing defenses against the novel coronavirus. People with HIV, but with higher numbers of defense cells, are twice as likely (2.26 times more likely) to develop antibodies as people in later stages of HIV infection.

The study was published as a pre-print, a type of draft in which the study remains open to review and contributions from other scientists before its final publication.

The Butantan Institute reported that two scientific studies published by researchers in Brazil and China have shown that the CoronaVac “is safe and capable of generating high levels of protection against SARS-CoV-2 in people infected with the HIV virus that causes AIDS.” One such study is the FMUSP paper, cited above.

“Four weeks after the second dose of the vaccine, the percentage of participants with positivity for neutralizing SC and NAb antibodies was high for both the group with HIV and the control group. No serious adverse reactions were reported during the study, whether among people with HIV or in the non-immunosuppressed participants,” the institute’s report reads.

Butantan adds in the report that the researchers found differences in immunogenicity parameters among people with HIV, with the group with the weakest immune system having lower immunogenicity against the Covid-19 virus when compared to those with higher defense cell counts after two vaccine doses.

“One possible approach is to use a booster vaccine dose or even administer higher antigen titers per vaccine dose,” the institute reported.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.