IBOV 175,664.62 ▲ 0.30% IPSA 11,445.90 ▼ 0.22% IPC MEX 65,484.32 ▼ 0.53% MERVAL 2,979,472 ▼ 0.72% COLCAP 2,457.87 ▼ 1.28% BVL PERÚ 60,779.49 ▼ 1.40% USD/BRL5.18▼ 0.18% USD/MXN17.01▼ 0.15% USD/CLP930.58— 0.00% USD/COP3,200— 0.00% USD/PEN3.36▲ 0.41% USD/ARS1,512▼ 0.03% USD/UYU40.27▲ 1.47% USD/PYG5,900▲ 1.27% USD/BOB11.78▲ 3.30% USD/DOP58.75▲ 0.24% USD/CRC446.65▲ 0.97% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.20% USD/HNL26.84▲ 0.40% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES793.00▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.72▲ 0.84% EUR/BRL6.01▼ 0.38% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 175,664.62 ▲ 0.30% IPSA 11,445.90 ▼ 0.22% IPC MEX 65,484.32 ▼ 0.53% MERVAL 2,979,472 ▼ 0.72% COLCAP 2,457.87 ▼ 1.28% BVL PERÚ 60,779.49 ▼ 1.40% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Monday, August 31, 2026

Latin America Defense Monitor

Uruguayan experts point to Chinese patrol boats as the best option for the Navy

By · May 10, 2022 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – After a little more than a month of analysis, the various advisory commissions appointed by the Government of Uruguay to evaluate the three bids submitted for the provision of two ocean-going patrol vessels for the Navy have indicated that the proposal of the Chinese company CSTC is the most suitable for the country since it meets all the requirements requested.

This decision is the culmination of a search that began almost eight years ago, with multiple calls and competitions and for which the new government opted to make a direct purchase by exception, making an open call to all shipyards that wanted to present themselves and providing a list of requirements that would be weighed by several commissions, including a technical commission of the Navy, a financial commission and a follow-up commission.

After receiving bids was concluded, only three shipyards complied with the presentation of their proposals, the French Kership, the Dutch Damen, and the Chinese China Shipbuilding Trading Co. (CSTC).

After receiving bids was concluded, only three shipyards complied with the presentation of their proposals, the French Kership, the Dutch Damen, and the Chinese China Shipbuilding Trading Co. (CSTC).
After receiving bids was concluded, only three shipyards complied with the presentation of their proposals, the French Kership, the Dutch Damen, and the Chinese China Shipbuilding Trading Co. (CSTC). (Photo: internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Damen, as expected, presented a version of the OPV 1800 similar to the Malaysian Tun Fatimah class, while it was initially assumed that the French and Chinese shipyards would repeat the offers made in the previous processes, with the OPV 90 and the P18N, respectively, but this was not what finally happened.

In the case of Kership, a different option was presented to the one acquired by Argentina in 2018 under a contract of 319 million euros for four units, including three new and one second-hand launched in 2011, which would undoubtedly put the original French model well above the budget managed by Uruguay. The unit offered, of lower performance than the OPV 90, would not comply with many of the technical requirements requested in the bidding documents beyond being the cheapest financial proposal of the three.

THE BEST OFFER, ACCORDING TO EXPERTS

Concerning China, instead of going for the P18N of 1,700 tons displacement and 95 meters in length, this time it was decided to take as a basis a larger vessel, with dimensions closer to those of a frigate, with more than 100 meters in length, 2,250 tons displacement and 8,500 nautical miles of autonomy.

The acquisition cost is US$140 million for the two ships with their armament, ammunition, and ready to sail from China. To this must be added the cost of the integrated logistic support for which the Navy is asking for at least five years, at the cost of US$6 million per ship, which would bring the total investment to US$152 million for both ships. China also offers to maintain and upgrade the ships’ software for 20 years at no additional cost.

Optionally, the extension of the integrated logistic support is offered for another ten years, at a total cost of US$38 million for both ships, as well as the installation of western communication and data link systems provided by Thales instead of Chinese as in the base offer, for another US$9.5 million.

If the latter option – the 15-year integrated logistics support and Thales systems – were chosen, this would bring the Chinese bid to a maximum of US$199.5 million and still fall short of Damen’s proposal, which stands at US$225 million and would not include the option to extend the logistics support beyond five years. Comparing the bids with the same logistics support time (five years), software maintenance for 20 years, and western communications equipment, the Chinese bid comes in at US$161.5 million versus US$225 million for the Dutch shipyard.

The selection process was approved by all the members of the advisory commissions, both in the technical part and in the financial advice and follow-up commission. From now on, the process passes to the government to decide politically on the next steps to be taken.

With information from InfoDefensa

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.