IBOV 175,664.62 ▲ 0.30% IPSA 11,445.90 ▼ 0.22% IPC MEX 65,484.32 ▼ 0.53% MERVAL 2,979,472 ▼ 0.72% COLCAP 2,457.87 ▼ 1.28% BVL PERÚ 60,779.49 ▼ 1.40% USD/BRL5.16▼ 0.54% USD/MXN17.00▼ 0.19% USD/CLP927.12▼ 0.47% USD/COP3,203▲ 0.08% USD/PEN3.36▲ 0.34% USD/ARS1,512▼ 0.03% USD/UYU40.27▲ 1.47% USD/PYG5,900▲ 1.27% USD/BOB11.78▲ 3.30% USD/DOP58.75▲ 0.24% USD/CRC446.65▲ 0.97% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.20% USD/HNL26.84▲ 0.40% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES793.00▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.72▲ 0.84% EUR/BRL5.99▼ 0.63% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 175,664.62 ▲ 0.30% IPSA 11,445.90 ▼ 0.22% IPC MEX 65,484.32 ▼ 0.53% MERVAL 2,979,472 ▼ 0.72% COLCAP 2,457.87 ▼ 1.28% BVL PERÚ 60,779.49 ▼ 1.40% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Monday, August 31, 2026

Covid-19 Brazil

Rio de Janeiro Records Refusals to Covid-19 Vaccine Among Healthcare Professionals

By · January 21, 2021 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – The second day of the vaccination campaign in Rio has been marking exciting records of elderly and healthcare professionals being vaccinated. However, there have also been cases of refusal.

On Wednesday, January 20th, Municipal Health Secretary Daniel Soranz said that six elderly people have already refused vaccination against Covid-19, as have some healthcare professionals.

The second day of the vaccination campaign in Rio has been marking exciting records of elderly and healthcare professionals being vaccinated. However, there have also been cases of refusal.
The second day of the vaccination campaign in Rio has been marking exciting records of elderly and healthcare professionals being vaccinated. However, there have also been cases of refusal. (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

In a morning interview, the Secretary had confirmed the information of the six cases in nursing homes, but this number has been increasing, despite still being the minority.

“Now we also have refusals from healthcare professionals,” said Daniel Soranz, who was unable to provide further details, for reasons of privacy, but confirmed that the refusals were based on “ideology”.

In this first vaccination phase, 34% of healthcare professionals are being covered – an estimate of the number of frontline workers against Covid-19 – elderly and disabled residents of long-term care institutions (ILPIs) and indigenous people.

“The great majority of people are very keen to be vaccinated, they are very excited about vaccination. Unfortunately, there are still people who are resistant to the vaccine, and this is very negative, because they put their lives and the lives of others at risk,” explained Soranz, who appealed against concerns of priority groups. “This vaccine is very safe, without any documented serious adverse effects, all the adverse effects were very mild in the studies.”

‘Legal limbo’

Despite being rare, these situations concern authorities, also because of the legal questions on the issue. Experts pointed out that there are still no specific rules and regulations for such cases. Although mandatory, vaccination cannot be compulsory. For the time being, the advice is to intensify information campaigns on the need for vaccination.

On Tuesday, GLOBO disclosed the first reported case of refusal to the vaccine, at the Recreio dos Anciões nursing home, where an elderly couple said they did not want to be vaccinated. On the issue, attorney specialized in geriatric homes Ariane Angioletti, legal advisor of the National Front for the Strengthening of ILPIs, explained that the legal discussion is new, but her position is to guide nursing homes to rescind contracts with these elderly.

“Vaccinations on the national immunization calendar are mandatory, but the vaccine against Covid-19 is still an exceptionality for now. What we have is a Federal Supreme Court decision that allows states and municipalities to take restrictive measures against those who do not accept the vaccine. In theory, it is mandatory, but it cannot be coercive. So it remains in a legal limbo. We don’t have any defined penalties yet,” explained Ariane on Tuesday.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.