Brazil · Politics
Updated 1 time · Latest: 16 October 2026
In short · 16 October 2026
- Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, known as Lulinha, is a son of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. He is under investigation and has not been charged.
- On 27 March 2026 the rapporteur of Congress’s pension-fraud inquiry (CPMI do INSS), Alfredo Gaspar, asked for his indictment, but the commission rejected the report by 19 votes to 12 on 28 March.
- Supreme Court (STF) justices have authorised three Federal Police inquiries: two by André Mendonça on 30 and 31 July, and one by Flávio Dino on 4 August.
- On 20 August Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet asked Mendonça to send his two inquiries to a lower court, because no one under investigation has the right to be tried by the Supreme Court.
- Lulinha’s lawyers deny any business or payments with the lobbyist at the centre of the case, and one of them calls the inquiries politically motivated.
Key Facts
—Who. Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, known as Lulinha, a businessman and a son of President Lula.
—What. Three Federal Police inquiries authorised by Supreme Court justices, while a congressional report that asked for his indictment was rejected by the commission in March; no charge has been filed.
—Why it matters. The case involves the president’s family in the final weeks before the 25 October runoff against Senator Flávio Bolsonaro.
—The catch. Allegations come from a congressional report and police inquiries; none has been tested in court, and his lawyers deny business or payments with the lobbyist.
Who Is Fábio Luís da Silva?
Fábio Luís Lula da Silva is a son of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and Brazilians call him Lulinha, or “little Lula”. He is a businessman, not a public official, which is why the prosecutor-general argues his case does not belong in the Supreme Court.
The inquiries centre on Antônio Carlos Camilo Antunes, a lobbyist known as “Careca do INSS”. Investigators describe him as a coordinator of a scheme of unauthorised deductions from the benefits of pensioners of the national social security agency (INSS).
The Congressional Report of March 2026
On 27 March 2026 Alfredo Gaspar, the rapporteur of the joint congressional inquiry into the INSS fraud, presented a report of more than 4,000 pages that asked for the indictment of more than 200 people. Lulinha was among them, for influence trafficking, money laundering and criminal organisation, among other charges, InfoMoney and the Chamber of Deputies reported.
In the early hours of Saturday 28 March the commission rejected Gaspar’s report by 19 votes to 12 and closed its work without a final report, the Chamber of Deputies said. The government’s parallel report was not put to a vote.
Edson Claro, a former Antunes employee, told the Federal Police that Lulinha received a monthly allowance of about R$300,000 (about US$59,000) from Antunes, Poder360 and InfoMoney reported. That is a witness’s claim, not a court finding, and Lulinha’s lawyers deny business or payments with Antunes.
Lawyer Guilherme Suguimori Santos told BBC News Brasil that Lulinha joined Antunes on trips to Portugal to learn about a cannabidiol project, and that the two had no joint business. Another lawyer, Marco Aurélio Carvalho, said the inquiries use police sectors to serve political interests, Exame reported on 4 August.
Three Supreme Court Inquiries
On 30 July Justice André Mendonça authorised the Federal Police to open an inquiry into suspected influence trafficking and corruption in favour of Antunes in the Health Ministry, in which Lulinha allegedly used his closeness to the presidential palace. On 31 July he authorised a second inquiry, into suspected favouritism towards business owners in contracts of Dataprev, the federal social-data company.
On 4 August Justice Flávio Dino authorised a third inquiry, into a group that allegedly conducted illicit business in federal government areas. At the request of Lulinha’s defence, Dino also ordered a separate inquiry into the leaking of confidential information from the investigations, O Povo and O Liberal reported.
Where the Case Stands in October
On 20 August Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet asked Mendonça to send his two inquiries to a lower court. His argument was that no investigated person holds the “foro privilegiado”, the right to be tried by the Supreme Court, Band and InfoMoney reported.
Mendonça had not ruled on the request in the latest reports we found, and Poder360 described an impasse that left the Federal Police without a prosecutor’s opinion for new steps. We have not found a formal ruling by Mendonça as of 16 October.
What Lula Has Said
In an interview with Record TV aired on Sunday 23 August, Lula said that no one is above the law, including his son. He added that his son must prove his innocence.
Earlier, on a podcast reported by Estadão Conteúdo on 14 August, he said that if his son is guilty, he will pay. The two quotes come from different interviews and should not be mixed up.
Our reports on the detail: what Lula told Record TV, why the Supreme Court opened the inquiry, and the prosecutor’s push to move the probes out of the top court.
- Brazil’s Lula on Lulinha Investigation: No One Above the Law 24 Aug 2026
- Lulinha: Brazil Prosecutor Wants Lula’s Son Probes Out of Top Court 20 Aug 2026
- Brazil Pension Scandal Hits Senator, Lula’s Son 5 Aug 2026
- Roberta Luchsinger: Plea Plan and Lula’s Son Probe 4 Aug 2026
- Lulinha: Why Lula’s Eldest Son Faces a 2026 STF Probe 31 Jul 2026
What It Means for Readers Outside Brazil
For US readers, the case matters as political risk in the weeks before the 25 October runoff, not as a market event. Nothing in the reports reviewed changes Brazilian policy, and no charge has been filed.
The next signals are a ruling by Mendonça on which court should hear the inquiries, any decision by the Federal Police to formally name Lulinha as a suspect or to file charges, and how the runoff campaign uses the case.
What Is Not Known
It is not known whether the investigators hold evidence of payments beyond the allegations in the congressional report, because the evidence collected by the police has not been made public. It is also not known whether the inquiries will stay at the Supreme Court or move to a first-instance judge.
The congressional commission closed without a final report, so Parliament has made no finding on Lulinha. He is presumed innocent, and the allegations above are attributed to the outlets and officials that made them.
More: Brazil news in English, every day from The Rio Times.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Fábio Luís da Silva?
Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, known as Lulinha, is a Brazilian businessman and a son of President Lula. He is under investigation and has not been charged.
What is Lulinha accused of?
A congressional rapporteur asked for his indictment on charges including influence trafficking and money laundering, but the commission rejected the report 19 to 12 on 28 March. His lawyers deny business or payments with the lobbyist at the centre of the case.
How many investigations target Lulinha?
Three Federal Police inquiries have been authorised by Supreme Court justices: two by André Mendonça on 30 and 31 July, and one by Flávio Dino on 4 August. Dino also ordered a separate inquiry into leaks from the investigations, at the defence’s request.
Has Lulinha been charged?
No. Reports reviewed by The Rio Times describe inquiries, but no criminal charge against him.
What did Lula say about his son?
On Record TV on 23 August, Lula said no one is above the law, including his son, and that his son must prove his innocence.
Sources: InfoMoney, CPMI rapporteur’s reasons, 27 March 2026, BBC News Brasil via O Povo, three STF inquiries, 4 August 2026, O Liberal, Dino authorises third inquiry, Band, prosecutor-general’s request, 20 August 2026, Chamber of Deputies, CPMI closes without a final report, 28 March 2026
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error · Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief
Read More from The Rio Times