IBOV 179,722.48 ▲ 1.30% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 64,514.25 ▼ 1.40% MERVAL 3,049,455 — 0.00% COLCAP 2,470.26 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,450.29 ▲ 0.11% USD/BRL5.15▼ 0.13% USD/MXN17.00▲ 0.01% USD/CLP936.45▼ 0.10% USD/COP3,160▼ 1.51% USD/PEN3.36▼ 0.06% USD/ARS1,513▲ 0.25% USD/UYU40.24▲ 0.68% USD/PYG5,873▲ 0.47% USD/BOB12.08▲ 3.98% USD/DOP58.56▲ 0.51% USD/CRC446.47▲ 1.09% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 1.63% USD/HNL26.84▲ 1.11% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.20% USD/VES799.17▲ 0.23% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.69▼ 0.06% EUR/BRL5.96▼ 0.89% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 179,722.48 ▲ 1.30% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 64,514.25 ▼ 1.40% MERVAL 3,049,455 — 0.00% COLCAP 2,470.26 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,450.29 ▲ 0.11% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Claro and Oi Sued for R$300 Million

By · August 4, 2009 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

By Bruno De Nicola, Contributing Reporter

Brazil's Minister of Justice, Tarso Genro, photo by Elza Fiuza/ABR.
Brazil's Minister of Justice, Tarso Genro, photo by Elza Fiuza/ABR.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
Latin American markets, currencies and companies.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

RIO DE JANEIRO – After disregarding the government’s latest call center regulations on several occasions, Brazilian phone providers Claro and Oi are being taken to court. The overwhelming amount of complaints over customer relationship management has caused consumer unions from 24 states to file a law suit against the two communication giants.

If found guilty, the companies will have to pay upwards of R$300 Million each. This sum is one hundred times the maximum fine proposed in the Consumer’s Rights Code of Law.

On December 12, 2008, thanks to the consumer union Procons’s perseverance, the Brazilian government announced the so called “Call Center Act” to better regulate phone provider customer service. According to the decree, both mobile and home phone companies are forced to answer to a customer’s phone call within sixty seconds. They are also obliged to facilitate contractual closure if a client isn’t satisfied with the service. The act contains several rules defining the call center’s modus operandi, including forbidding an operator to ask a client to repeat his request.

However, since last year, little has changed and numerous clients have continued to complain about slow and tangled customer service. The phone companies have been keeping people on hold for interminable periods of time and forcing them to repeat their requests to every specialized operator they are passed to.

Ricardo Morshita, Chief of the DPDC (National Department for Consumer’s Rights), believes that phone provider customer service departments are still to hard to access, adding: “Sometimes call center operators even hang up on their clients, and not because they don’t know what else to do. They do it because it’s company policy.”

“Despite many investments in HR and IT, customer service remains a problem in the telecommunication sector,” said Minister of Justice, Tarso Genro, who explains that the dilemma is that fines for breaking the “Call Center Act” are trivial compared to trimester revenues.

Phone companies prefer to pay penalties rather than abide by the law, as government fines are too lax. In a few words, Oi/Brasil Telecom pays about R$2.5 Million annually for call center irregularities, while Claro pays about R$1.1 Million, insignificant figures for such huge corporations. Oi/Brasil Telecom, for example, earned R$734 Million in revenue from April to June of this year.

The law suit is a new record in the Brazilian telecommunications industry, and is hoped by many to serve as an example for all companies in the sector.

A look at the Procons ranking for consumer complaints, in fact, shows that the telecommunication sector leads the chart and can be held responsible for 57 percent of overall Brazilian client discontent. Second place goes to credit card companies, which at a more reasonable 18 percent.

In the home phone sector, Oi/Brasil Telecom causes 60 percent of consumer complaints, whereas Claro, in the mobile phone sector, is responsible for 37 percent. Covering the two key areas of phone spend and representing a sizable chunk of market discontent, the two companies have been chosen as poster children for what is wrong with Brazil’s phone provider customer service.

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.