IBOV 167,927.15 ▲ 0.06% IPSA 11,237.90 ▼ 0.03% IPC MEX 64,436.38 ▲ 0.68% MERVAL 2,875,950 ▲ 0.05% COLCAP 2,444.32 ▼ 0.39% BVL PERÚ 58,380.78 ▲ 0.54% USD/BRL5.19▲ 0.33% USD/MXN16.93▼ 0.17% USD/CLP922.65▲ 0.14% USD/COP3,064▲ 0.41% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.11% USD/ARS1,497▼ 0.02% USD/UYU40.21▲ 0.95% USD/PYG5,992▲ 1.19% USD/BOB11.42▲ 0.14% USD/DOP58.50▼ 0.34% USD/CRC446.30▲ 2.09% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.24% USD/HNL26.81▲ 1.60% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.29% USD/VES775.47▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.93% EUR/BRL6.07▲ 0.58% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 167,927.15 ▲ 0.06% IPSA 11,237.90 ▼ 0.03% IPC MEX 64,436.38 ▲ 0.68% MERVAL 2,875,950 ▲ 0.05% COLCAP 2,444.32 ▼ 0.39% BVL PERÚ 58,380.78 ▲ 0.54% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Friday, August 21, 2026

Chile Politics - Brazil

The next Chile government’s plan to eliminate PFAs from the pension system

By · December 21, 2021 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – In his victory speech on Sunday night, the President-elect, Gabriel Boric, confirmed the proposal of a collective pension system in which the AFPs (Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones), the country’s Pension Funds Administrators, will not participate, at least in the mandatory section.

And even though the future president’s team knows that the road will be more than complex, considering that they do not have a majority in Congress, they have a plan to execute the campaign promise.

Read also: Check out our coverage on Chile

The proposal, as explained by those close to the command, is to transfer the flow of contributions to the new public body that will be in charge of managing the pension savings, leaving aside the PFAs from this task, allowing, however, that the affiliates -who so prefer- can keep the stock of their resources in the private pension fund managers.

Although the AFPs have no place in the current pension reform, the private sector would be allowed to remain in the voluntary pension savings business (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

GRADUALNESS

Boric’s team points out that ending the transition period could take some 40 years, considering the following example. Suppose a person who had just entered working life and managed to contribute to an AFP before Boric’s system began and prefers to keep his savings in the AFP. In that case, the administrator will remain in place until that member retires.

This transition, they point out, took place within the framework of the programmatic agreement reached with the teams of Yasna Provoste and Marco Enríquez-Ominami after the first round of the presidential elections.

“What we have defined with the teams of Provoste and MEO was a transition where all the flow of new and old contributors will go to the system we propose. People who have resources in the system can choose whether or not to go with this scheme. This will be gradual in terms that the AFPs, in the best-case scenario for them, will last 40 years. That seems a more than fair transition,” says an expert on the next government’s proposal.

BALANCE-BASED CHARGING

In any case, in Boric’s proposal, the AFPs will change. One of them is in relation to administering the stock of affiliates who choose them over the new system.

Currently, the administrators have a fee when receiving the contributions, a cost that varies between 0.58% and 1.45% of the taxable remuneration.

This is why, for their subsistence during the transition period, one of the alternatives discussed within the President-elect’s pension team -although it has not been entirely resolved- is that the fund managers begin to charge for the balance administered.

“In the new system, we are going to charge per balance to cover administration expenses. Compared to what the AFPs charge today on the salary, this is cheaper, with a charge of between 0.3% and 0.4%. The reasonable thing to do, by market logic, is that the AFPs will charge the same as this new public entity so that there is no difference,” says a member of the team.

Although the AFPs have no place in the current pension reform, the private sector would remain in the voluntary pension savings business.

With information from Diario Financiero

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.