IBOV 208,506.76 ▲ 8.53% IPSA 11,052.82 ▲ 1.25% IPC MEX 64,531.68 ▲ 1.10% MERVAL 2,841,487 ▲ 2.67% COLCAP 2,538.58 ▲ 0.94% BVL PERÚ 59,751.67 ▲ 0.18% USD/BRL4.98▼ 4.42% USD/MXN18.13▼ 0.22% USD/CLP971.42▼ 1.93% USD/COP3,198▼ 1.73% USD/PEN3.43▼ 0.17% USD/ARS1,519▼ 0.39% USD/UYU40.34▼ 0.30% USD/PYG5,844▲ 0.40% USD/BOB11.95▲ 0.17% USD/DOP60.17▲ 0.45% USD/CRC455.71▼ 0.15% USD/GTQ7.63▼ 0.09% USD/HNL26.86▼ 0.01% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES869.19▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.68▼ 0.14% EUR/BRL5.59▼ 5.07% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 208,506.76 ▲ 8.53% IPSA 11,052.82 ▲ 1.25% IPC MEX 64,531.68 ▲ 1.10% MERVAL 2,841,487 ▲ 2.67% COLCAP 2,538.58 ▲ 0.94% BVL PERÚ 59,751.67 ▲ 0.18% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Monday, October 5, 2026

Crypto North America

U.S. Supreme Court declares affirmative action unconstitutional in landmark ruling

By · June 30, 2023 · 2 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court, with a conservative majority, voted 6-3 to declare “affirmative action” and similar measures unconstitutional.

These policies, implemented since 1978, allowed preferential treatment for certain groups in job and university admissions based on race, leading to concerns about fairness and meritocracy.

The court’s decision stemmed from two lawsuits, one against the University of North Carolina (UNC) and another against Harvard University.

In both cases, the court ruled that their affirmative action policies violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits racial discrimination.

U.S. Supreme Court declares affirmative action unconstitutional in landmark ruling.
U.S. Supreme Court declares affirmative action unconstitutional in landmark ruling.
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing the majority opinion, emphasized that the Constitution focuses on substance rather than labels.

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Brazil runoff set: Flávio 47%, Lula 45%, 25 October”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

He argued that race should not be the sole basis for granting benefits or admissions, but rather individual experiences, achievements, and contributions to the university.

Affirmative action had resulted in significant disparities in academic standing among students of different races on college campuses.

Critics argued that it led to situations where students from certain racial backgrounds with lower test scores were admitted over others with higher scores.

For example, a study found that at Harvard, an African-American student in the 50th percentile had a higher chance of admission than a white student in the 90th percentile.

The Supreme Court’s decision marked a significant shift in the interpretation of the Constitution regarding affirmative action.

It addressed concerns about fairness and the principle of equal protection under the law, while encouraging universities to consider a broader range of individual experiences and achievements in their admissions processes.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error · Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Editor-in-Chief

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.