Panama Targets Exit From EU Tax List by Late 2026 or Early 2027
Panama is pressing to leave the European Union’s list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes by late 2026 or early 2027, relying on a beneficial-ownership registry overhaul and the mass dissolution of inactive corporations.
Panama sets a window to leave its last list
President José Raúl Mulino and Economy and Finance Minister Felipe Chapman have confirmed that Panama is on a path to exit its last remaining discriminatory fiscal list by late 2026 or early 2027. The list in question is the European Union’s catalogue of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. Officials have presented the target as the closing stage of a multi-year compliance effort rather than a fresh commitment. Two other international designations have already been lifted, which leaves the tax list as the outstanding item.
The stated strategy runs on two tracks. The first is a rigorous update of the Unique Registry of Beneficial Owners, the database that records the people who ultimately stand behind locally registered companies. The second is the mass dissolution of inactive corporations that remain on the public registry without economic activity behind them. Because removal is decided in Brussels rather than in Panama City, the government controls the work but not the calendar.
Two different lists, two different tests
The distinction between the two international instruments most often cited in Panama’s case is not cosmetic. The Financial Action Task Force, the global standard-setter on anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing policy, maintains a list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring, commonly called the grey list. Its criteria concern the effectiveness of controls against criminal finance, including supervision, sanctions and the availability of ownership information to investigators.
The European Union’s list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes is a separate exercise agreed by EU finance ministers. Its criteria concern tax matters rather than criminal-finance controls, and it is reviewed on the European Council’s own schedule. A jurisdiction can therefore satisfy the FATF and still appear on the EU tax list, and the reverse is equally possible. Conflating the two has been a recurring source of confusion in commentary about Panama’s standing.
The milestones already banked
Panama was removed from the FATF grey list in October 2023, after a plenary meeting in Paris found that the country had strengthened its system against money laundering and terrorist financing. The decision followed a period of legislative and supervisory change and ended the increased-monitoring status that had applied to the country. For banks and their correspondents abroad, that removal addressed the most widely watched of the designations.
The second milestone came in 2025, when Panama was taken off the European Union’s list of high-risk jurisdictions for money laundering, the instrument known as the AML list. In practice, EU decisions on high-risk third countries have tended to track FATF assessments closely, so the 2023 outcome opened the way. With both anti-money-laundering designations lifted, the EU tax list is the only one left, and it is the one the government is now targeting.
The beneficial-ownership registry at the centre of the plan
Registers of beneficial ownership are designed to record the natural persons who ultimately own or control a legal entity, so that authorities can see through chains of corporate and nominee shareholders. Panama’s version is the Unique Registry of Beneficial Owners, known in Spanish as the Registro Único de Beneficiarios Finales and referred to locally as the RUB. Ministers have made a rigorous update of that registry one of the two pillars of the exit strategy.
The emphasis on updating rather than creating matters. Registers of this kind age quickly, because ownership changes hands, entities are sold or wound up, and filings drift out of date unless they are refreshed and checked. International assessors generally weigh the accuracy and timeliness of the data at least as heavily as the existence of the register itself. That makes the quality of the RUB, rather than its mere presence, the point on which the exercise turns.
Clearing out the dormant corporations
The second pillar is the mass dissolution of inactive corporations. Panama’s corporate registry is one of the country’s best-known services, and a share of the entities recorded on it carry no economic activity at all. Each of those entities nonetheless has to be documented, verified and kept current if the beneficial-ownership data is to mean anything.
Removing dormant vehicles therefore serves two purposes at once. It reduces the universe of records that resident agents and supervisors must maintain, and it lifts the proportion of registered entities for which reliable ownership information is available. The measure also has a domestic dimension, since dissolutions affect company owners, resident agents and the professional services firms that administer them. The government has framed the exercise as housekeeping that the compliance timetable requires.
Why a listing bites hardest in a services economy
Panama’s economy is heavily services-based. Banking, the ship registry and the Panama Canal sit at its centre, alongside logistics, insurance and corporate and legal services. Those activities depend on the willingness of counterparties to move money, cargo and paperwork through the jurisdiction without friction.
A listing does not close that trade, but it raises the cost of it. Appearing on a non-cooperative list carries reputational and compliance costs, and it can trigger additional due diligence by European counterparties on transactions and on client onboarding. Extra checks lengthen timelines, add documentation and, in aggregate, raise the cost of cross-border business. The burden falls most heavily on precisely the parts of the Panamanian economy that sell trust.
What Brussels looks for, in general terms
The EU tax listing exercise rests, in broad terms, on criteria in three areas: transparency and the exchange of tax information, fair taxation and the absence of harmful preferential regimes, and the implementation of internationally agreed measures against base erosion and profit shifting. Jurisdictions that fall short but commit to reform are usually held in a separate annex while they carry out the changes, and are assessed again later. Member states also apply their own defensive measures to listed jurisdictions, and those measures vary from country to country.
Verification is technical and slow. Much of it depends on peer-review bodies that examine how information requests are handled in practice, not only on what the statute book says. That is why officials describe a window rather than a fixed date, and why the credibility of the RUB update is likely to matter more than any announcement made in Panama City.
What to watch through 2027
Three markers will show whether the timetable holds. The first is the periodic revision of the EU list by member states, which is where any removal would be recorded. The second is evidence that the RUB update is producing verified, current ownership data rather than simply a larger volume of filings. The third is the pace and completion of the dissolution programme for inactive corporations.
A further point is worth keeping in view: removal is not permanent. Jurisdictions can be relisted if commitments slip or if later assessments find gaps, which is why the compliance work would not end with a favourable decision in Brussels. For Panama, the practical test through 2027 will be whether European banks, funds and corporates change how they treat Panamanian counterparties once the last listing is gone.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Panama still on the FATF grey list?
No. Panama was removed from the Financial Action Task Force grey list in October 2023, after an FATF plenary in Paris found that it had strengthened its anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing system. The designation the country is still working to shed is a different one, the European Union’s list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. The two lists are separate instruments applied by different bodies under different criteria.
When does Panama expect to leave the EU tax list?
President José Raúl Mulino and Economy and Finance Minister Felipe Chapman have confirmed a path to exit by late 2026 or early 2027. That is a target rather than a guarantee, because the decision rests with EU member states, who revise the list on their own schedule. Officials have described the range as the point at which a decision could realistically land. Progress on the beneficial-ownership registry and on the dissolution programme will shape the outcome.
What is the RUB?
The RUB is the Unique Registry of Beneficial Owners, known in Spanish as the Registro Único de Beneficiarios Finales. Registers of this type record the natural persons who ultimately own or control a legal entity, allowing authorities to look through corporate and nominee shareholders. A rigorous update of the RUB is one of the two pillars of Panama’s strategy for leaving the EU tax list. The quality and currency of the data it holds are what assessors generally examine.
Why does a tax listing matter for Panama’s economy?
Panama is a services economy in which banking, the ship registry, the Panama Canal and corporate and legal services are central. Being named on a non-cooperative list carries reputational and compliance costs and can trigger extra due diligence by European counterparties. That friction raises the cost of cross-border business and lengthens the time needed to complete transactions and onboard clients. The effect is concentrated in the sectors that depend most directly on counterparty confidence.
Sources: MEF Panamá, FATF, European Commission.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
Read More from The Rio Times