IBOV 179,722.48 ▲ 1.30% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,314.78 ▼ 0.18% MERVAL 3,049,455 ▲ 0.51% COLCAP 2,470.26 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,450.29 ▲ 0.11% USD/BRL5.16— 0.00% USD/MXN16.98▼ 0.07% USD/CLP936.45▲ 0.24% USD/COP3,173▼ 1.10% USD/PEN3.36▲ 0.02% USD/ARS1,513▼ 0.02% USD/UYU40.24▲ 1.23% USD/PYG5,873▲ 1.18% USD/BOB12.08▲ 3.43% USD/DOP58.56▲ 0.51% USD/CRC446.47▲ 2.10% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.02% USD/HNL26.84▲ 1.46% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.20% USD/VES799.17▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.69▲ 1.40% EUR/BRL5.96▼ 0.81% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 179,722.48 ▲ 1.30% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,314.78 ▼ 0.18% MERVAL 3,049,455 ▲ 0.51% COLCAP 2,470.26 ▲ 1.86% BVL PERÚ 59,450.29 ▲ 0.11% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Opinion: the latest South Caucasus clashes are timed to exploit Russia’s setback in Kharkiv region

By · September 13, 2022 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

(Opinion) Armenia and Azerbaijan once again traded accusations that the other attacked their forces without provocation, which led to them trading fire across their shared border.

While it remains unclear which side was responsible for the latest aggression, it’s obvious that the culprit aimed to exploit Russia’s setback in Kharkiv Region over the weekend.

Read also: Check out our coverage on curated alternative narratives

From this observation, the latest clashes can be interpreted in two ways.

Photo internet reproduction.
Photo internet reproduction.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Viewed from the Armenian perspective, Azerbaijan (almost certainly backed by its Turkish ally as part of a possible regional power play) sought to militarily resolve the problem of armed fighters remaining on its universally acknowledged territory that it’s previously drawn enormous attention to.

Baku’s motivation in this scenario would have been to force an Armenian retreat while Russia’s distracted in Ukraine and ultimately coerce Yerevan into completely withdrawing from Karabakh.

From the Azerbaijani perspective, Armenia might have been encouraged by the US (considering CIA chief Burns’ visit in mid-July) to provoke another Continuation War for the purpose of opening up a so-called “Southern Front” that would divide Russia’s military focus from Ukraine.

Accordingly, Yerevan’s motivation in this scenario would have been to force an emergency Russian intervention to protect its remaining fighters in Karabakh, which could have risked a wider war with Azerbaijan and Turkey.

Building upon the above scenarios, each would have very serious consequences for Russia’s relations with the aggressor, but they also have three points in common:

1) they were preplanned to exploit disadvantageous military developments for Russia in Ukraine;

2) they’d worsen Russia’s ties with Azerbaijan and Turkey; and

3) they’d weaken Russia’s influence in the South Caucasus. It can therefore be concluded that the latest clashes advance America’s grand strategic interests.

Both conflicting parties have close ties with that declining unipolar hegemon, so it’s impossible to discern from their bilateral relations alone which were responsible for what just happened.

Nevertheless, Russia will predictably investigate all the facts connected with these latest clashes to determine which country provoked them, after which it’ll react accordingly even if it doesn’t do so directly or publicly.

That’s because Moscow considers the aggressor a dangerous US Hybrid War proxy.

Join us on Telegram: t.me/theriotimes

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.