The idea that a group of Western, internationally operating bankers and corporate elites in cooperation with the politicos of the leading nations is responsible for the rise of those corrupt and totalitarian powers in recent history with which Western Europe and the USA have been in wars and conflicts for years and decades is absurd and unimaginable for many people.
Likewise, most of the conflicts, wars, and revolutions of recent history were purposefully used and steered by these internationalists/globalists/elites (IGE) to achieve an already determined final goal, a New World Order (NWO), dismissed by many establishment forces as a conspiracy but still as real as you and me.
Read also: Check out our coverage on curated alternative narratives
Historical facts prove that this involvement of IGEs is a continuity in recent history, as you will soon see.
In their work’ Hidden History’, Scottish historians Jim McGregor and Gerry Docherty demonstrate how a group of influential figures from the British Empire and the United States laid the groundwork for the creation of the First World War. The close ties and cooperation between the elites of the Entente and Central Powers are comprehensively covered in their subsequent work, ‘The War That Wouldn’t End’, and are a proven reality.
Historians such as Anthony C. Sutton, Guido Preparata, and Edwin Black have comprehensively demonstrated in their works, based on facts, that the National Socialists were able to come to power with the help of those very international elites, which in turn also controlled their opponents in the USA and Great Britain.
Few people in German society saw Adolf Hitler as a politician to be taken seriously. This changed when the flow of massive investments from both domestic and foreign companies began. Through the Keppler Fund, which the Keppler Circle set up, an interest group with connections primarily in the U.S., came the money that enabled the Nazis to come to power in the first place.
In addition, companies such as Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Ford, General Motors, and IBM supported the Nazi war effort.
Likewise, Prescott Bush, grandfather, and father of two U.S. presidents, in his position as director of the Union Banking Corporation, helped launder funds for the Nazis before and during the war. The proceedings initiated because of this were dropped, and today, the Bush family is one of the most powerful families in the USA.
Anthony C. Sutton has also proven, based on facts, that it was Western bankers, corporate elites, and politicians through whose help the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in Russia. It is also proven that during the Cold War, the same elites maintained close relations with the Warsaw Pact states, giving both loans and material support.
These ties and cooperation between the Western and Eastern elites are increasingly forgotten today, and for some, it is hard to imagine that the West created its own enemies.
The fact is, however, that the governments and elites of the Western enemies supported and advocated precisely the same interests and goals of the IGE. They were never in an enmity with each other, which is why supporting them was never a risk.
Mikhail Gorbachev, the leader of the Soviet Union who is widely credited with its disintegration and thus the creation of the “new Russia,” is an example of how, behind the curtain, elites from the East were pursuing the same interests in the form of a New World Order and centralized global government, as Western politicians such as former U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, advisor to French President Mitterand and “discoverer” of Macron, Jacques Attali, and oligarch Bill Gates did and continue to do.
In his speech at the founding of the International Green Cross on April 20, 1993, Gorbachev stated the following:
The emerging “environmental nation” of our civilization and the need for vigorous action in the interest of the entire global community will inevitably have multiple political consequences. Perhaps the most important one of them will be a gradual change in the status of the United Nations. Inevitably, it must assume some aspects of a world government. Indeed, such a process has already begun. One day, however, the organization’s entire structure will have to be reconsidered.
–
Under the title Perspectives on Global Change, Gorbachev gave a speech to students at Lafayette College in Easton, Pennsylvania, nearly two decades later, in October 2011, in which he argued that a global government, disguised as global governance, was necessary to secure “freedom.”
The opportunities that existed after the end of the Cold War… were not appropriately used. At that same time, we saw that the entire world situation did not develop positively. We saw deterioration where there should have been a positive movement toward a new world order.
He continued:
But we still are facing the problem of building such a world order. We have crises: we are facing environmental issues, backwardness and poverty, and food shortages. These problems are because we do not have a global governance system.
Finally, it is worth mentioning Jim Garrison, President of the Gorbachev Foundation in the USA, who in 1995 expressed quite directly in the San Francisco Weekly what Gorbachev meant by a New World Order:
Over the next 20 to 30 years, we will end up with a world government. … It’s inevitable. It will happen and become just as usual to have a relationship with the rest of the world as we now have, say if you are a Californian and go to Vermont.
When we look at today’s alternative media, it is curious that the misleading East-West enmity has been so manifested, and the past cooperation of East and West has been forgotten.
Many recognize enemies of IPI in Eastern nations. The past has shown that the enemies of the West were created by the IGE and kept alive until they got closer to their goal.
Why should this have changed since the collapse of the Soviet Union?
THE EAST IS DOMINATED BY GLOBALIST INFLUENCES
When protests against the Kazakh government broke out in Kazakhstan at the beginning of 2022, Western plans for overthrow were quickly identified in them. The narrative that the West, or rather the IGE, wants to overthrow the Eastern governments keeps popping up in alternative media and blogs.
And even though there are those interested in a coup in Kazakhstan, for example, banker Mukhtar Ablyazov, who fled Kazakhstan, the IGE has no reason to carry out or support one in Kazakhstan or any other Eastern nation.
The reason is that they have been firmly entrenched in the East for decades!
Staying with Kazakhstan, former Kazakh President Nazarbayev met with several IGEs, including British banker Jacob Rothschild, during a visit to London in 2015. In 2017, the Kazakh government met with Rothschild & Co. leadership, including Klaus Mangold, Giovanni Salvetti, and Éric de Rothschild, as a result of which Rothschild Bank was appointed advisor to the Central Bank of Kazakhstan.
And in the other member states of the Commonwealth of the Independent States, which includes Russia, the Rothschilds also officially offered their services until the beginning of the fighting in Ukraine.
Globalist George Soros is also present in Kazakhstan through the Soros Foundation-Kazakhstan.
The influences of the World Economic Forum (WEF) also reach far into the East.
In January 2020, the announcement was made to open a Fourth Industrial Revolution center in Astana. In addition, the Kazakh government under President Tokayev declared its support for efforts to combat man-made climate change. A year later, Russia joined the WEF agenda and opened a Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Moscow.
Let us take this opportunity to look closely at Russia today under President Putin.
It is worth recalling that Western banks have lent billions in loans to Russia, and corporations such as British Petroleum have made extensive investments in Russia. In 2011, Goldman Sachs helped the Russian government set up an investment fund for Western capital. Meanwhile, Wall Street banking elites joined an advisory committee that helped transform Moscow into an international financial center.
In 2013, Goldman Sachs became an economic advisor to the Russian government, as it had in 1992 under Boris Yeltsin, and was considered one of the largest investment banks in Russia in 2018, along with JP Morgan.
In addition, Big Pharma’s influences on Russia are also well documented, and both Putin and Russian business elites support agendas of “man-made global warming” and sustainability.
The Eastern nation following the globalist agenda is China by a wide margin. Be it the Social Credit system, the Covid-19 lockdowns, or the lack of freedom of speech.
Just like Russia and Kazakhstan, China is closely tied to the WEF. At the same time, the Rothschilds and other major international banks do business in China, and Goldman Sachs is closely involved in the activities and business arrangements of the Chinese government and its sub-organizations. Like the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, through their Rockefeller Foundation, have had a presence and influence in China for over a century.
In its official publications, China joins Russia in calling “…to protect the international architecture operated by the United Nations…” (“…to protect the United Nations-driven international architecture…”), as well as:
To accelerate the implementation of the U.N. 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the sides call on the international community to take practical steps in critical areas of cooperation such as poverty reduction, food security, vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity.
There is no reason to speak of hostility between East and West.
Eastern governments are linked to and subject to the influences of the same globalist institutions as Western governments.
The modus operandi of controlling both sides of a game to emerge as the winner at the end has not changed. Eastern nations like Russia received massive support from Western banking elites and are still closely cooperating with them.
Why would the IGE help their enemy if they want to eliminate them, and why would Putin or Xi Jinping cooperate with the globalists to eradicate them?
This makes no sense unless the East WANTS to be a part of the New World Order, and there is NO real enmity between the two camps.
But to what end do the IGEs present us with a conflict between the East and the West?
THE CREATION OF A ONE-WORLD CURRENCY
Globalist insider Carroll Quigley described on page 248 in his comprehensive work Tragedy and Hope one of the main goals of the IGE:
In addition to these pragmatic goals, the powers of finance capital had another broad objective, none less so than the establishment in private hands of a system of world financial control which would be capable of regulating the political system of any country and the world economy as a whole.
.
This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic manner by the world’s central banks – under secret agreements to be established in regular private meetings and conferences. At the head of this system was to be the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland.
The BIS in Basel has the most important central banks in the world under its control, and this global central banking cartel includes the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Japan, as well as the Bank of Russia and the People’s Bank of China. Accordingly, it forms an excellent system for establishing a global system of financial control.
One possible version of this financial control was depicted in the 1988 article Get Ready for a World Currency in the Rothschild magazine The Economist, which presented a world in which national currencies were replaced by a world currency, called Phoenix in the article, within a time span of three decades. At the helm of this one-world currency system is a global central bank modeled not on the BIS but on the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
In the decades following World War II, an increasing amount of evidence and facts surrounding the BIS’s assistance in financing the Nazi war machine before and during the war have come to light. Journalist Gian Trepp has comprehensively described this cooperation in his work’ Banking with the Enemy’ (Bankgeschäfte mit dem Feind). It is an understandable consequence of its policies that the BIS had to fade into the background after the war, and new global institutions such as the IMF came into the public eye from then on.
On the part of the IGE, it is clear that they have shifted from having the BIS at the helm of such a control system to the IMF, as indicated in The Economist article.
For years, globalists like Mohamed El-Erian have openly called for a global monetary system to be created through the IMF’s basket of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) and openly advocated the 1988 version of The Economist article.
There is also support for this idea within the WEF, and Article XXII of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement commits all member countries to “making the SDR the principal reserve currency in the international monetary system.” (“making the special drawing right the principal reserve asset in the international monetary system.”).
In fact, alternatives to the dollar have been openly discussed within the IMF for years as has created a global currency since 2000.
Chatham House, the British equivalent of the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, which helped create the SDR, has proposed in its paper Gold, the SDR, and Other Matters a replacement of the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency by gold-backed SDRs. In doing so, reference is made within the paper to an article by Catherine Schneck of the University of Glasgow entitled Adding Gold to the Valuation of the SDR, which steers in the same direction.
The Western IGEs openly support the creation of a new global monetary system, as do the governments of the East, which like the West, are members of the IMF and are at least as helpful to the globalist agenda.
China, for example, expressed support for the expansion of the SDR into a new IMF-led global reserve currency in 2009. Zhou Xiaochuan, Governor of the People’s Bank of China from 2002 to 2018, a member of the Board of Directors of the BIS, and, like his successor Yi Gang, a member of the Group of Thirty, echoed the same sentiments as Chatham House in his paper ‘Reform The International Monetary System’: The creation of a precious metals standard and the expansion of the SDR into a global currency.
China had borrowed massively in dollars in recent decades, adding trillions to its original minimal debt, which was a prerequisite for the inclusion of the renminbi in the SDR basket in 2016.
Furthermore, Russia also supports the agenda. In 2009, Putin and the Kremlin openly called for the IMF to create a new reserve currency based on the SDR ahead of the G20 conference.
Shortly before, Kazakh President Nazarbayev called for “a single global currency as a potential solution for the current financial turmoil.” This would be “under the aegis of the United Nations”.
The BRICS, which are widely seen as a counterpart to the U.S.-led Western alliance and include Brazil, India, and South Africa in addition to Russia and China, declared in 2013 during their fifth meeting in Durban under item 13:
We support the reform and improvement of the international monetary system, with a broad-based global reserve currency system providing stability and certainty. We welcome the discussion about the role of the SDR in the existing international monetary system, including the composition of the SDR’s basket of currencies. We support the IMF in making its surveillance framework more integrated and even-handed.
In their demands for a new global (reserve) currency, the Eastern governments stand shoulder to shoulder with the demands of the Western IGE and the governments they control.
What prevents the IGE from establishing the system they propagate is the world reserve currency status of the U.S. dollar. Only when it loses this status will a vacuum be created in which the IGE, with the support of the governments of the West and East, can position and establish a new global reserve currency under IMF control.
Globalist frontman George Soros said in 2009 that China would take a more prominent role in the IMF, while the U.S. would become less critical and the world would move away from the U.S. dollar.
In its eight predictions for 2030, the WEF states in point 2 that the U.S. will no longer be the leading superpower. These statements reveal that the IPI knows about the loss of the U.S. status as a world power and the dollar as the world reserve currency.
We should now ask how the IGE intends to establish a new global financial and monetary system. To do so, we should consider the following train of thought:
In the past decades, large parts of Western production were relocated to countries like China or India. This created massive dependencies on these economic heavyweights, which cannot have escaped the attention of the IGE and have finally become visible due to the Covid restrictions and the resulting supply chain bottlenecks.
Suppose these countries now begin to ban the U.S. dollar from their trade. In that case, their trading partners will inevitably have to follow suit if they continue to source goods and services, which will lead to the repatriation of trillions of dollars in international markets and the repatriation of these back to the U.S.
The trade war between the U.S. and China, a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan with a corresponding counter-reaction by the U.S. and the West, and the West’s current sanctions policy against Russia can be seen as catalysts to justify a final move away from the U.S. dollar.
The result will be a hyperinflationary collapse of the U.S. economy, while the status of the world reserve currency will no longer be occupied. Russia, China, and other nations and organizations will repeat their previous demands and implement a new global monetary system based (provisionally) on the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights.
And if there is a world currency, then a world government is not far away either.
CONCLUSION
In the last decade, many have indulged in the idea that the politicians of the East would form an alternative to the system of the IGE.
However, in the behavior of Putin, Xi, Nazarbayev, and other Eastern heads of state and politicians, an anti-globalist thrust is not discernible in any way. They all supported the agenda of the IGE and are quite visibly part of this grouping themselves.
It is time for people to realize that mere rhetoric is meaningless and the truth is much more likely to be: the New World Order will come from the East, and the collapse of the USA will be the final precursor for it.
Always be careful when trusting political leaders. Pay more attention to their actions than their words and remember: these people would never have reached these positions if they did not conform to the traits of the IGEs. Moreover, they would not be alive either, or at least would face harsher political, media, and economic blows if they resisted the globalist agenda.
This is mirrored and was published first here