IBOV 168,498.45 ▲ 1.39% IPC MEX 71,393.57 ▲ 0.43% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.51▼ 0.03% USD/MXN18.59▼ 0.18% USD/CLP 975.74 — 0.00% USD/COP3,240▲ 0.03% USD/PEN3.44▼ 0.08% USD/ARS1,545▼ 0.03% USD/UYU40.31▲ 3.23% USD/PYG6,358▲ 6.40% USD/BOB11.81▲ 0.77% USD/DOP60.62▲ 4.10% USD/CRC448.27▲ 2.01% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.17% USD/HNL26.88▲ 3.19% USD/NIO 36.62 — 0.00% USD/VES895.29▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.83▲ 2.67% USD/TTD6.72▲ 2.44% EUR/BRL6.14▼ 0.57% BRENT 97.36 ▼ 0.98% WTI 90.31 ▼ 0.57% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.28 ▲ 1.06% GOLD 4,081 ▲ 0.14% SILVER 52.19 ▲ 0.74% SOY 1,194 ▲ 1.08% CORN 441.50 ▲ 0.34% WHEAT 591.25 ▼ 1.34% COFFEE 280.15 ▲ 1.08% SUGAR 18.25 ▼ 1.67% ORANGE JUICE 130.55 ▲ 1.63% COTTON 78.54 ▼ 0.22% COCOA 5,119 ▼ 1.20% BEEF 214.05 ▼ 0.16% CATTLE 318.38 ▼ 2.05% LITHIUM 60.91 ▲ 1.21% PETR4 45.36 — 0.00% VALE3 64.04 — 0.00% ITUB4 40.53 — 0.00% BBDC4 14.20 — 0.00% ABEV3 15.48 — 0.00% BBAS3 17.13 — 0.00% B3SA3 14.39 — 0.00% WEGE3 48.19 — 0.00% PRIO3 60.48 — 0.00% SUZB3 53.40 ▲ 2.12% RENT3 30.29 — 0.00% AZZA3 14.76 ▲ 4.98% CSAN3 2.77 — 0.00% RAIZ4 28.00 ▲ 2.56% PCAR3 2.40 ▲ 0.42% GMAT3 3.80 — 0.00% PSSA3 44.35 ▲ 1.46% CVCB3 0.84 ▲ 2.44% POSI3 3.09 ▼ 0.64% SLCE3 16.61 ▲ 1.59% NATU3 5.17 — 0.00% BRKM5 3.20 — 0.00% RANI3 8.53 ▲ 0.83% CSNA3 4.41 — 0.00% IBOV 168,498.45 ▲ 1.39% IPC MEX 71,393.57 ▲ 0.43% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.51 ▼ 0.03% USD/MXN 18.61 ▼ 0.10% USD/CLP 975.74 — 0.00% USD/COP 3,240 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.44 ▼ 0.08% USD/ARS 1,545 ▼ 0.03% USD/UYU 40.31 ▲ 3.23% USD/PYG 6,358 ▲ 6.40% USD/BOB 11.81 ▲ 0.77% USD/DOP 60.61 ▲ 4.08% USD/CRC 448.27 ▲ 2.01% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.17% USD/HNL 26.88 ▲ 3.19% USD/NIO 36.62 — 0.00% USD/VES 895.29 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.83 ▲ 2.67% USD/TTD 6.72 ▲ 2.44% EUR/BRL 6.14 ▼ 0.57% BRENT 97.36 ▼ 0.98% WTI 90.31 ▼ 0.57% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.28 ▲ 1.06% GOLD 4,081 ▲ 0.14% SILVER 52.19 ▲ 0.74% SOY 1,194 ▲ 1.08% CORN 441.50 ▲ 0.34% WHEAT 591.25 ▼ 1.34% COFFEE 280.15 ▲ 1.08% SUGAR 18.25 ▼ 1.67% ORANGE JUICE 130.55 ▲ 1.63% COTTON 78.54 ▼ 0.22% COCOA 5,119 ▼ 1.20% BEEF 214.05 ▼ 0.16% CATTLE 318.38 ▼ 2.05% LITHIUM 60.91 ▲ 1.21% PETR4 45.36 — 0.00% VALE3 64.04 — 0.00% ITUB4 40.53 — 0.00% BBDC4 14.20 — 0.00% ABEV3 15.48 — 0.00% BBAS3 17.13 — 0.00% B3SA3 14.39 — 0.00% WEGE3 48.19 — 0.00% PRIO3 60.48 — 0.00% SUZB3 53.40 ▲ 2.12% RENT3 30.29 — 0.00% AZZA3 14.76 ▲ 4.98% CSAN3 2.77 — 0.00% RAIZ4 28.00 ▲ 2.56% PCAR3 2.40 ▲ 0.42% GMAT3 3.80 — 0.00% PSSA3 44.35 ▲ 1.46% CVCB3 0.84 ▲ 2.44% POSI3 3.09 ▼ 0.64% SLCE3 16.61 ▲ 1.59% NATU3 5.17 — 0.00% BRKM5 3.20 — 0.00% RANI3 8.53 ▲ 0.83% CSNA3 4.41 — 0.00%
since 2009
Monday, November 9, 2026

Brazil Guest Opinions

Opinion: Bolsonaro says Brazil would be a shadow of itself without military rule – is that disgraceful?

By · · 4 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – (Opinion) Anyone who thought that Jair Bolsonaro would be intimidated by the never-ending barrage of attacks and fabricated ‘investigations’ against him from Brazil’s left-leaning top judiciary was proven wrong yesterday.

The president of Brazil said that the country would be a ‘republiqueta’ (a shadow of itself) without the work done in 21 years of military rule and reiterated his doubts about the process of presidential elections to be held on Oct. 2 in a new challenge to electoral justice.

“What would Brazil be without the work of the military government? It would be nothing; we would be a ‘republiqueta,” he said during a speech at Planalto Palace to inaugurate seven new ministers after much of the Cabinet resigned to run in the Oct. 2 election.

Free daily brief — no card needed
Get every Brazil story in one morning email
We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.
Bolsonaro
Bolsonaro says that Brazil would be a shadow of itself without military government.
RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Bolsonaro insisted that back then, the process of overthrowing constitutional President João Goulart, whose office was declared vacant after a military uprising in Minas Gerais, was not a coup.

“Everyone back then had the right to move, come and go, and leave the country,” Bolsonaro said.

NEARLY 20 YEARS OF LEFTIST GOVERNMENT HAVE FABRICATED NEW ‘TRUTHS’

After almost 20 years of a leftist government in Brazil, certain events have been reinterpreted to fit the leftist narrative. One of these reinterpretations is that the military government back in the 1960s was a disgrace to the country.

This view is mainstream Brazilian “truth” today. All those who dare to question it even a little bit or also see positive aspects during this military period (e.g. the creation of infrastructure projects) are accused of glorifying the dictatorship, are publicly denounced, branded as stupid, right-wing extremist, dangerous, and unserious and immediately have their reputation ruined by legacy media.

But isn’t it a typical sign of a ‘dictatorship’ that dissenters are being broken and ‘destroyed’ by the establishment?

Conversely, one would have to assume that we live in a dictatorship of opinion right now since it seems impossible even to express different aspects of a period or have another view without getting ridiculed, branded, and ‘canceled’.

And in this context, is the media’s job to bash and ridicule dissenters, or is it their job to report? What does it say about the health of society when media become organs of censorship of mainstream narratives?

We all know that there is no “truth” per se, but that any truth is in the eye of the beholder and mainstream narratives do not reflect truths but are created by those in power so that they may serve their purposes.

THE ELECTORAL PROCESS IS STILL CRITICIZED

The president also said it was legitimate to challenge the system of electoral control, and criticized the country’s high courts investigating his allies. In this regard, one could easily say that this is political persecution.

Officials persecute these people because they are allegedly ‘a danger to democracy’ because they spread ‘fake news’ and the like.

But who decides what is a danger to democracy or fake news? Is it the Supreme Court justices?

But if it is a handful of justices who decide that, Brazil would be an oligarchy and not a democracy, right? Oligarchy is defined as ‘government by a few, especially by a small faction of persons’.

So who is really a threat to democracy here?

“We cannot passively accept what is happening. People can be detained, their property confiscated, and their salaries withheld. Today we have a president who supports transparency in elections. They have made it illegal to challenge the electronic ballot box. We must have the security of the vote, which is the soul of democracy. If I do not decide, everyone will suffer,” he said.

Alluding to the date of the takeover of the government by the military in 1964, Bolsonaro recalled that thanks to the controversial considered Castelo Branco, Emilio Garrastazú Médici, and Ernesto Geisel, it was possible to develop infrastructure and agricultural activity in the center of the country and the Amazon jungle.

 

 

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. How we use AI · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.