IBOV 167,927.15 ▲ 0.06% IPSA 11,237.90 ▼ 0.03% IPC MEX 64,436.38 ▲ 0.68% MERVAL 2,875,950 ▲ 0.05% COLCAP 2,444.32 ▼ 0.39% BVL PERÚ 58,380.78 ▲ 0.54% USD/BRL5.20▼ 0.05% USD/MXN16.91▼ 0.26% USD/CLP922.65▲ 0.14% USD/COP3,064▲ 0.43% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.11% USD/ARS1,497▼ 0.02% USD/UYU40.21▲ 0.95% USD/PYG5,992▲ 1.19% USD/BOB11.42▲ 0.14% USD/DOP58.34▼ 0.61% USD/CRC446.30▲ 2.09% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.24% USD/HNL26.81▲ 1.60% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.29% USD/VES775.47▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.93% EUR/BRL6.07▲ 0.60% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 167,927.15 ▲ 0.06% IPSA 11,237.90 ▼ 0.03% IPC MEX 64,436.38 ▲ 0.68% MERVAL 2,875,950 ▲ 0.05% COLCAP 2,444.32 ▼ 0.39% BVL PERÚ 58,380.78 ▲ 0.54% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Friday, August 21, 2026

Brazil: what is the fiscal framework approved by the House of Representatives?

By · May 24, 2023 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

On Tuesday night, April 23, the House of Representatives approved the basic text of the fiscal framework of the Lula administration.

If it wanted to make the life of the average Brazilian easier, the government would baptize the novelty fiscal plan or fiscal system.

In general terms, Haddad’s law retires two essential rules to keep the country’s economy on track.

One is the Fiscal Responsibility Law (LRF), approved in May 2000 during Fernando Henrique Cardoso’s government.

Brazilian Minister of Finance, Fernando Haddad (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The second is the spending cap in 2016 during Michel Temer’s administration.

NO LICENSE TO SPEND

“The LRF created tougher rules for how governments should handle public accounts and made fiscal irresponsibility illegal,” said economist Hélio Beltrão.

“With this law, the government was obliged to establish in advance – and respect – the spending target for the next three years.”

Failure to comply with the LRF can cost a range of punishments, including impeachment or imprisonment for mayors, governors, and the president.

Ignoring these risks was one of the mistakes that shortened Dilma Rousseff‘s term, for example.

DILMA’S IMPEACHMENT

The spending cap created another essential rule for balancing the accounts: the increase in expenses for the following year must be limited to the current year’s inflation.

“Before the ceiling, governments used to increase spending on average 6% above inflation,” Beltrão recalls.

“The argument that such a limit compromises spending on education and security, for example, is a lie,” adds economist Marina Helena, who has held the Ministry of the Economy’s Directorate of Privatization.

“Brazil’s problem has never been lack of money, but money spent incorrectly. The ceiling forces the government to spend better.”

In counterpoint to the argument that the spending ceiling has already been exceeded on other occasions, as occurred during the Covid-19 pandemic, Beltrão ponders:

“For the ceiling to be pierced, it was necessary to approve a constitutional amendment in Congress. There was a long discussion.”

“The ceiling has already suffered reforms, but the overturning never occurred, as Lula and Haddad want now.”

The day’s proposal will cause an even bigger hole in the budget.

Codenamed Fiscal Responsibility Law 2.0, the framework authorizes the government to spend more and raise taxes.

While limiting spending to 70% of the increase in revenue, the bill replaces the spending cap with a “spending floor,” allowing spending to increase by at least 0.6% and at most 2.5% above inflation.

Among the taxes already created is the taxation, starting in 2024, of Brazilians with investments abroad.

For income between R$6,000 and R$50,000, the tax will be 15%.

Above this amount, the tax will reach 22.5%.

Income of up to R$6,000 is exempt.

Another proposal that did not advance in the original form was to tax retail companies like Shopee and Shein.

Haddad’s economic plan ignores any kind of punishment for the federal government.

“In practice, the government revokes the crime of responsibility,” says Beltrão.

Marina Helena adds: “The fiscal framework boils down to giving the government a blank check to spend at will, without the slightest responsibility.

The fear of being penalized favored the approval of important projects to control public spending, such as the Social Security Reform and the administrative mini-reform.

“Brazil’s main problem is the organization of public accounts,” reiterates Beltrão.

“The government spends too much and doesn’t want to stop spending. Cutting expenses is never an option.”

Excessive public spending and the gigantism of the state have always blocked the sustainable growth of the Brazilian economy.

With information from Revista Oeste

News Brazil, English news Brazil, Brazilian economy

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.