IBOV 175,664.62 ▲ 0.30% IPSA 11,445.90 ▼ 0.22% IPC MEX 65,484.32 ▼ 0.53% MERVAL 2,979,472 ▼ 0.72% COLCAP 2,457.87 ▼ 1.28% BVL PERÚ 60,779.49 ▼ 1.40% USD/BRL5.21▲ 0.39% USD/MXN17.03▲ 0.26% USD/CLP930.58— 0.00% USD/COP3,202▲ 2.39% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.07% USD/ARS1,512— 0.00% USD/UYU40.27▲ 1.50% USD/PYG5,900▲ 0.50% USD/BOB11.78▲ 3.59% USD/DOP58.61▲ 0.96% USD/CRC446.65▲ 0.98% USD/GTQ7.62▲ 2.25% USD/HNL26.84▲ 0.40% USD/NIO36.62▼ 0.02% USD/VES789.69▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.72▲ 0.77% EUR/BRL6.01▲ 0.17% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 175,664.62 ▲ 0.30% IPSA 11,445.90 ▼ 0.22% IPC MEX 65,484.32 ▼ 0.53% MERVAL 2,979,472 ▼ 0.72% COLCAP 2,457.87 ▼ 1.28% BVL PERÚ 60,779.49 ▼ 1.40% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Sunday, August 30, 2026

Brazil Life & Society

Majority supports raising taxes to reduce inequality in Brazil

By · May 31, 2021 · 5 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – Support has more than doubled since 2017, rising from 24% of Brazilians to 56%.

Amid a new spike in poverty and pressure to expand income programs, an unprecedented survey by Datafolha for Oxfam Brazil found that a majority of Brazilians now favor raising taxes to fund social policies.

Support for raising taxes to reduce inequality has more than doubled since 2017. (Photo internet reproduction)
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →

Support has more than doubled since 2017, rising from 24% of Brazilians to 56%. Nine in ten believe that reducing inequality should be the government’s priority; and a majority (68%) believe that tackling the issue is key to development.

With Brazil’s poverty rate at its highest level in about 15 years due to the Covid-19 pandemic, Congress has been pressuring the Jair Bolsonaro government to find sources to fund a more robust income distribution program; or bolster the Bolsa Familia (Family Grant).

The president himself has an interest, as his popularity has been closely linked to the payment of the emergency aid since 2020. The higher the benefit, the more Brazilians will approve of him.

Last year, the government began to analyze the creation of the Renda Brasil (Brazil Income), which would unify several social programs.

But Bolsonaro abandoned the issue, saying he would not take money “from the poor to give to the very poor” – because the program would eliminate some benefits for formal workers with lower incomes.

The poverty rate in Brazil, considering people living on less than R$246 (US$47) a month (R$8 a day), rose from 11% in 2019 to 16% in the first quarter this year.

Brazilians in poverty rose from 24 to 35 million, according to data from FGV Social.

In 2020, the payment of emergency aid exposed how such programs have an immediate impact: in August, at the peak of the R$600 monthly benefit payment, the poverty rate fell to 4.6% (10.1 million people), the lowest since official records began.

Between April and July this year, while the new R$250 average benefit is being paid, extreme poverty should drop from 16% in the first quarter to 13% (28 million people).

From August on, the trend is for the rate to rise again should the economy not react, mainly for informal workers – whose jobs, depending on their occupation, have shrunk by up to 20% in 2020.

While a tax reform is being discussed in Congress, the Datafolha/Oxfam survey showed that an even higher percentage of Brazilians (84%) support taxing mainly the wealthiest in order to finance social policies.

On the other hand, the wealthiest (with incomes above five minimum wages, or R$5,500) are the least favorable to this. Among them, adherence to the concept stands at only 35%.

Among Brazilians earning up to one minimum wage (R$1,100), who theoretically could benefit from the programs, support reaches 61%.

According to calculations made by the Center for Research in Macroeconomics of Inequalities (MADE) at FEA/USP, each R$100 redistributed from the wealthiest 1% in Brazil to the poorest 30% could generate an expansion in aggregate income of R$106.70, thereby boosting consumption and growth.

The calculation takes into account the distributive structure and the propensity of the different classes to consume, in which the poorest 10% spend 90% of their additional income on consumption; and the wealthiest 1% spend 24%.

The increase in the overall population’s support for levying more taxes on society as a whole, on the other hand, may be linked to the deterioration ofBrazilians’ personal situations, as they find themselves more vulnerable.

The survey found that 69% of Brazilians now consider themselves members of the “lower middle class” or “poor,” an increase of 5 percentage points from 2019.

There was also a reduction in the expectation of social mobility, according to the survey -which personally interviewed 2,079 people in 130 municipalities in Brazil between December 7 and 15, 2020. The survey’s error margin is 2 percentage points up or down.

According to Jefferson Nascimento, coordinator of Oxfam Brazil’s Social and Economic Justice area, the fact that the majority of the population now accepts more taxes on society as a whole (and not only on the wealthiest) shows that there is an understanding that new programs are required and that they need funding to be implemented.

“It seems to have finally dawned on us that money is needed for these investments. There is also a perception that the State should be responsible for policies to fight inequality, in line with what organizations like the IMF [International Monetary Fund] and the World Bank have been saying,” Nascimento says.

One of the goals of the survey is to insert the topic in the tax reform debate that the government and Congress may pursue over the coming months – to achieve more equity in tax collection and increase resources for programs against inequality.

A study by economist Pedro Ferreira de Souza, author of “Uma História da Desigualdade” [A History of Inequality] (Jabuti Prize in 2019), shows that when compared to other major regions (or even Latin America and southern Europe), Brazil is the country that collects the least amount of taxes through income tax – whereby the wealthiest and, predominantly, formal employees are taxed.

By concentrating a large part of the gross tax burden on the consumption of goods and services, Brazil has proportionally increased the burden on the poor – who consume virtually all of their income.

While tax reform is not advancing and the new emergency aid program is scheduled to end in July, Senate President Rodrigo Pacheco (DEM-MG) said last week that Congress may issue a measure to extend the program “for one or two months” – albeit not specifying where the resources will come from.

In 2020, the aid was paid between April and December using R$293 billion. The current round initially provides only R$44 billion (15% of last year’s total).

Economy Minister Paulo Guedes has also been working to create alternatives and has announced programs that are still vague – and without concealing the electoral advantage that this may provide.

Another option is to expedite the redesign of Bolsa Família (Family Grant), increasing the value of the benefits and expanding the target audience before the 2022 election.

In an interview to Folha, published last week, Guedes declared: “Now the elections are coming? We are going to attack. There will be an improved Bolsa Família, BIP [Productive Inclusion Bonus], BIQ [Qualification Incentive Bonus], there will be many great things for you to applaud. Everything is done properly, seriously, without breching the cap, with no
confusion.”

Many specialists advocate bolstering Bolsa Família as the most effective way to fight poverty.

The program costs R$34.5 billion a year, reaches 14.7 million families, and pays an average of R$190 a month – less than the average of the emergency aid in 2020 (R$600) and this year (R$250).

According to MADE’s projections, for every R$100 distributed through the emergency aid last year, there was a R$140 increase in aggregate income.

In the case of Bolsa Família, because it is targeted on extremely poor people, the multiplier effect is much greater.

According to calculations by economist Naercio Menezes, from Insper, for every R$1 more per capita provided by the program, the per capita GDP of the municipality where the money is spent increases by R$4 – hence the preference of many specialists for the Bolsa Família.

Live Market IntelligenceBrazil — Live Market BoardInside: market breadth, the sector heatmap, currencies & rates, the Latin America scoreboard and the full instrument board.

Rio Times · Live Market Intelligence

Brazil — Live Market Board

B3 · São Paulo
Aug 29, 2026 · 21:18

Ibovespa · benchmark
175,664.62
+0.30%
L 167,142day rangeH 168,310

+21.85% over 12 months

Market breadth · 15 names
47% advancing

7 ▲ advancing8 declining ▼

Currencies, rates & key inputs
USD / BRL
5.16
+0.01%

EUR / BRL
5.95
+1.01%

Selic rate
14.00%
·

Brent crude
88.88
-0.03%

Iron ore
161.91
·

Sector heatmap · average move today
Materials
+2.35%
SUZB3

Mining
+1.16%
VALE3, CSNA3, GGBR4

Industrials
+0.20%
WEGE3, RENT3

Financials
-0.10%
ITUB4, BBDC4, BBAS3, B3SA3

Energy
-0.12%
PETR4, PRIO3

Consumer Staples
-0.80%
ABEV3

Utilities
-1.38%
ENEV3

Consumer Disc.
-2.63%
AZZA3

Latin America scoreboard
IndexLastTodayStrength
IbovespaBrazil
175,664.62
+0.30%

S&P/BMV IPCMexico
65,484.32
-0.53%

S&P IPSAChile
11,445.90
-0.22%

S&P MERVALArgentina
2,979,472
-0.72%

MSCI COLCAPColombia
2,457.87
-1.28%

BVL S&P PerúPeru
60,779.49
-1.40%

Full instrument board
Instrument Last Change YoY Prev. High Low Volume
IBOV 175,664.62 +0.30% +21.85% 175,135.41 168,310 167,142
USD/BRL 5.16 +0.01% -5.13% 5.16 5.18 5.14
SELIC 14.00%
PETR4 41.64 -0.05% +35.19% 41.66 41.97 41.15 41,499,400
VALE3 72.97 +0.83% +30.75% 72.37 73.54 72.66 17,658,000
ITUB4 38.60 -1.03% +4.57% 39.00 39.34 38.39 29,487,800
BBDC4 16.85 +0.36% +3.50% 16.79 16.90 16.67 19,416,900
BBAS3 19.37 +0.47% +0.73% 19.28 19.44 19.16 11,069,200
B3SA3 14.26 -0.21% +12.73% 14.29 14.47 14.11 33,037,800
ABEV3 14.89 -0.80% +21.91% 15.01 15.07 14.81 16,453,100
WEGE3 47.59 +0.49% +29.99% 47.36 48.08 47.36 3,364,600
PRIO3 59.14 -0.19% +50.67% 59.25 59.81 58.74 3,325,600
SUZB3 41.33 +2.35% -23.55% 40.38 41.48 40.35 3,914,900
RENT3 34.68 -0.09% +0.84% 34.71 34.96 34.35 7,979,100
AZZA3 15.89 -2.63% -53.76% 16.32 16.42 15.82 1,330,300
CSNA3 4.30 +0.47% -42.65% 4.28 4.41 4.26 10,076,100
GGBR4 24.69 +2.19% +51.38% 24.16 24.85 24.18 7,047,600
ENEV3 24.21 -1.38% +70.49% 24.55 24.64 23.99 9,297,000

Largest moves today
AZZA3
15.89
-2.63%
SUZB3
41.33
+2.35%
GGBR4
24.69
+2.19%
ENEV3
24.21
-1.38%
ITUB4
38.60
-1.03%
VALE3
72.97
+0.83%
ABEV3
14.89
-0.80%
WEGE3
47.59
+0.49%

The session read
The Ibovespa rose 0.30%, with breadth negative — 7 of 15 names higher. Materials led, while Consumer Disc. lagged.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.