Guyana Says Its Gas Pipeline Cannot Leak. It Has No Gas In It
Energy
Key Facts
—The claim. Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed said the $1bn subsea gas pipeline had ruptured, citing footage of water bubbling near an anchored vessel.
—The denial. The environmental agency and the maritime administration said there is no factual basis, because no gas is flowing through the line.
—The concession. The same agencies confirmed a probe found something irregular in the twelve-inch pipeline, called it thoroughly investigated, and gave no outcome.
—The silence. The environmental agency’s head and spokespeople for both agencies and for ExxonMobil did not answer questions.
—The timing. ExxonMobil began a scheduled three-month inspection of the line on May 27, using five vessels. It runs to August 15.
—The stake. The line feeds a 300-megawatt plant at Wales that the government says will halve household electricity bills.
Two Guyanese agencies rejected the claim that the Guyana gas pipeline had ruptured. Read their statement closely and it does not say the pipe is undamaged.

On Wednesday the leader of the opposition, Azruddin Mohamed, said the billion-dollar line had ruptured. It runs from ExxonMobil’s offshore Liza field to the coast.
He pointed to still images and video of the Atlantic bubbling near a utility vessel. The vessel was anchored a couple of miles off Georgetown.
The natural resources minister, Vickram Bharrat, denied it that night. The next day the Environmental Protection Agency and the Maritime Administration Department issued a joint statement.
What the Guyana gas pipeline statement actually says
Both agencies stated clearly that there is no factual basis for the claims. Their reasoning followed at once: the pipeline is not active, and no gas is flowing through it.
Since no gas passes through the line, they wrote, there can be no leak or damage of the nature suggested. That sentence is worth sitting with.
A pipeline containing no gas cannot leak gas. It cannot leak gas whether it is perfectly intact or split open along its length.
The denial is therefore true, and it is also not an answer to the question. Nobody asked whether gas was escaping; the question was whether the pipe is damaged.
Then the agencies confirmed an anomaly
Roughly a day after the opposition raised the alarm, the government said inspections of a small anomaly were underway. The two agencies confirmed a report had come in, and that a probe revealed something irregular in the twelve-inch pipeline.
The anomaly, they said, was thoroughly investigated. They provided no information about what the investigation found.
The head of the environmental agency did not respond to queries. Neither did spokespeople for the maritime administration, the environmental agency, or ExxonMobil Guyana.
An ExxonMobil spokesman said later that the company would share information as soon as it could. Both agencies urged the public to verify facts through official channels before drawing conclusions.
What the Guyana gas pipeline is for
The line carries gas from the Liza field in the Stabroek block to a landing point on the West Coast of Demerara. From there it runs overland to Wales on the west bank of the river, and ExxonMobil finished it in December 2024.
At Wales the government is still building a 300-megawatt power station and a natural gas liquids plant. ExxonMobil Guyana’s president has put the cost of the pipeline and its extra infrastructure at a billion dollars.
Until the plant is ready, the line sits filled with nitrogen, an inert gas. That is why it carries no natural gas today.
A disaster response expert told the Guyanese outlet that first reported the story he was not aware of any damage. The inspection now under way is not a response to Mohamed.
ExxonMobil began a scheduled three-month survey of the subsea line on May 27, announced in a public notice. It uses five vessels and runs until August 15.
One detail cuts both ways. The vessel Mohamed filmed, the Telesto, is itself among the five working the inspection.
So bubbling water beside it is as consistent with survey work as with a breach.
Why Guyanese households are watching
Guyana pays some of the highest electricity prices in the region, generated by burning imported heavy fuel oil. The Wales project is the government’s answer, promising to roughly halve bills and more than double generating capacity.
It is already late. The first completion target was the end of 2024, then the middle of this year, and one of the two American contractors building the plant walked away last July.
This newspaper reported two days ago that the transmission network is 99 percent complete, with the first turbine due before the year ends. A pipeline problem would be the one piece nobody has budgeted for.
Neither the government nor ExxonMobil has said the pipe is damaged, and nothing in the public record establishes that it is. What the record does establish is an anomaly, an investigation, and no published finding.
Has the pipeline ruptured?
Nothing in the public record establishes that it has, and both agencies reject the claim. Their stated reason is that no gas flows through the line, which rules out a gas leak but does not address whether the pipe is physically damaged.
What is the anomaly the agencies mentioned?
They confirmed that a probe found something irregular in the twelve-inch pipeline, called it thoroughly investigated, and said further inspections were under way. No outcome has been published, and officials from both agencies and from ExxonMobil did not answer questions about it.
Does this delay cheaper electricity?
It is too early to say, because no finding has been released. The Wales power station and gas liquids plant were already behind schedule, having missed an end of 2024 target and then a mid-2026 one, while the transmission network is reported at 99 percent complete.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Guyana's government confirm or deny that the subsea gas pipeline ruptured?
Two Guyanese agencies — the environmental agency and the maritime administration — denied there was a rupture. They said there is no factual basis for the claim because no gas is flowing through the line. Yet the same agencies confirmed that a probe found something irregular in the twelve-inch pipeline, without disclosing the outcome.
What evidence did Opposition Leader Azruddin Mohamed present to support his rupture claim?
Azruddin Mohamed pointed to still images and video showing the Atlantic Ocean bubbling near a utility vessel anchored a couple of miles off Georgetown. He cited this as evidence that the $1 billion subsea gas pipeline had ruptured.
Why is the Guyana gas pipeline considered significant?
The pipeline runs from ExxonMobil's offshore Liza field to the coast and feeds a 300-megawatt power plant at Wales. The government states the plant will halve household electricity bills for Guyanese residents.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
Read More from The Rio Times