Brazil’s Farm Bailout Was Priced at $155bn. Now It’s $580m a Year
Fiscal Policy
Key Facts
—The spread. Finance Minister Dario Durigan first put the bill at R$800bn, then R$140bn over thirteen years.
—The latest. On Thursday he said the negotiated version adds R$2bn to R$3bn ($388m to $583m) a year, plus implicit subsidy.
—The volume. Around R$100bn ($19.4bn) of farm debt would actually be renegotiated, from a stressed portfolio of R$200bn to R$250bn.
—The mechanism. The Treasury covers the gap between the renegotiated rate and the Selic benchmark of 14.25 percent.
—The ladder. Senators voted rates of 3.5, 5.5 and 7.5 percent; the ministry now proposes 6, 9 and 12.
—The warning. Banks report moral hazard and rising delinquency caused by the negotiation itself.
Ask Brazil’s government what its farm rescue costs and you will get a different answer depending on the month. The Brazil rural debt package has been priced at eight hundred billion reais, at a hundred and forty billion, and this week at three billion a year.
Those are not all the same measurement. The first two are lifetime totals and the last is annual, so they cannot be lined up directly.
The gap is still remarkable. Two of them describe the same bill, and one is more than five times the other.
Finance Minister Dario Durigan said on Thursday that talks were in their final stretch. He also said something the farm lobby will not enjoy repeating.
Why the Brazil rural debt talks are causing defaults
Banks are telling the ministry that the negotiation itself is the problem. Lenders report both moral hazard and rising delinquency, because farmers stop servicing loans while forgiveness is being discussed.
That is why Durigan wants it finished quickly. Every week the talks continue, the pool of debt that qualifies for relief grows.
The evidence is already visible in the credit numbers. Banco do Brasil, the country’s largest agricultural lender, tightened collateral rules after more than eight hundred of its farm borrowers sought court protection.
Lending to large producers fell by nearly a fifth in the season now ending. A rescue designed to restore credit is, for the moment, helping to freeze it.
Where the money actually goes
The cost is not a cheque to farmers. It is the subsidy the Treasury pays to close the gap between the interest a farmer pays and the rate at which the state borrows.
Brazil’s benchmark rate stands at fourteen and a quarter percent. Lend to a small producer at six percent and the Treasury absorbs the difference on every real, for as long as the loan runs.
That arithmetic explains the fight over the rate ladder. According to the Senate’s own account of its June vote, senators set rates of three and a half percent for small producers, five and a half for medium and seven and a half for the rest.
The ministry’s counter-offer is roughly double that. It proposes six, nine and twelve percent, with the farm bench pushing back toward four, six and eight for climate-hit producers.
A bill the government is trying to kill
The legislation already exists. The Senate passed it on the tenth of June, funded partly from the Pre-Salt Social Fund, the sovereign pot fed by Brazil’s offshore oil.
The government calls it a fiscal bomb and wants it dead. Officials say President Lula will veto it if the lower house passes it, and that they would ask the Supreme Court to strike it down should Congress override him.
The whole point of the emergency decree now under negotiation is to make that confrontation unnecessary. Agree a cheaper package, and the bill never reaches the president’s desk.
Time is short, and it is an election year. Lawmakers are drifting out of the capital to campaign, and few of them wish to be recorded voting against farmers.
What the Brazil rural debt fight means for investors
Agribusiness is not a sideshow in this economy. Officials put the chain at more than a quarter of national output, and its exports are what produce the trade surplus holding up the currency.
A farm-credit system that seizes up therefore reaches the balance of payments within a season. That is the real stake, rather than the headline number.
There is also a structural idea buried in the talks worth watching. Durigan wants a guarantee fund, modelled on the one that insures bank deposits, capitalised jointly by the state, the banks and the sector to absorb first losses.
Whether it survives the bargaining is another matter. The farm bench wants the Treasury to seed it with five billion reais, which rather defeats the idea of shared risk.
How much does Brazil’s farm debt relief cost?
Nobody agrees. The Finance Ministry first estimated eight hundred billion reais, later revised to a hundred and forty billion over thirteen years, while the farm lobby calculates sixty-five billion over the same period and the minister now says the negotiated version adds two to three billion reais a year.
Why do banks say the talks cause defaults?
Because a producer expecting forgiveness has little reason to keep paying. Lenders have reported both moral hazard and rising delinquency while the renegotiation is being debated, which is why the minister wants an agreement concluded quickly.
Who ultimately pays for it?
The Treasury does, through interest equalisation. It covers the difference between the reduced rate charged to farmers and the benchmark Selic rate of fourteen and a quarter percent, so the cost rises with both the volume renegotiated and the size of the discount.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much farm debt would actually be renegotiated under the Brazil rural debt package?
Around R$100bn ($19.4bn) of farm debt would be renegotiated under the package. This comes from a stressed portfolio estimated at between R$200bn and R$250bn.
How does the Treasury mechanism work in covering renegotiated farm debt costs?
The Treasury covers the gap between the renegotiated interest rate and the Selic benchmark rate of 14.25 percent. Finance Minister Dario Durigan said the negotiated version adds R$2bn to R$3bn ($388m to $583m) a year, plus an implicit subsidy.
Why are banks reporting rising delinquency during the Brazil rural debt negotiations?
Banks are reporting that the negotiation itself is causing the problem, citing both moral hazard and rising delinquency. Farmers are stopping loan repayments while awaiting potential debt forgiveness, according to lenders reporting to the ministry.
Read More from The Rio Times