IBOV 172,457.76 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,204.98 ▼ 0.84% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.67▲ 0.45% USD/MXN18.52▼ 0.42% USD/CLP994.16▼ 0.13% USD/COP3,302▲ 0.70% USD/PEN3.40▼ 0.16% USD/ARS1,544▼ 0.11% USD/UYU40.59▲ 2.33% USD/PYG6,196▲ 2.33% USD/BOB11.59▼ 0.37% USD/DOP60.59▲ 1.85% USD/CRC442.74▼ 0.10% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 2.06% USD/HNL26.91▲ 2.15% USD/NIO36.62▲ 2.73% USD/VES909.35▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.69▲ 1.39% USD/TTD6.75▲ 1.58% EUR/BRL6.25▲ 0.93% BRENT 95.84 ▲ 0.02% WTI 88.56 ▼ 0.20% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.09 ▼ 1.50% GOLD 3,886 ▲ 0.03% SILVER 49.12 ▼ 1.70% SOY 1,232 ▲ 0.37% CORN 445.50 ▲ 0.68% WHEAT 593.25 ▲ 1.54% COFFEE 279.25 ▼ 0.34% SUGAR 18.40 ▲ 0.99% ORANGE JUICE 136.85 ▼ 2.91% COTTON 79.02 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,123 ▲ 1.13% BEEF 224.80 ▲ 2.70% CATTLE 335.35 ▼ 0.10% LITHIUM 58.76 ▼ 1.13% PETR4 45.30 ▲ 1.34% VALE3 63.50 ▼ 0.70% ITUB4 42.27 ▲ 1.42% BBDC4 14.52 ▲ 1.40% ABEV3 15.79 ▲ 0.25% BBAS3 15.10 ▼ 2.45% B3SA3 14.89 ▲ 0.88% WEGE3 51.31 ▼ 0.66% PRIO3 63.30 — 0.00% SUZB3 54.77 ▼ 2.27% RENT3 30.07 ▲ 1.66% AZZA3 15.91 ▼ 5.86% CSAN3 3.10 ▲ 8.77% RAIZ4 20.00 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.56 ▲ 7.11% GMAT3 4.25 ▲ 10.68% PSSA3 46.41 ▲ 1.02% CVCB3 0.83 ▼ 1.19% POSI3 3.15 ▼ 6.53% SLCE3 18.28 ▼ 0.44% NATU3 5.13 ▼ 3.75% BRKM5 3.02 ▼ 1.63% RANI3 8.18 — 0.00% CSNA3 3.72 ▼ 12.06% IBOV 172,457.76 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,204.98 ▼ 0.84% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.67 ▲ 0.45% USD/MXN 18.52 ▼ 0.42% USD/CLP 994.16 ▼ 0.13% USD/COP 3,302 ▲ 0.70% USD/PEN 3.40 ▼ 0.16% USD/ARS 1,544 ▼ 0.11% USD/UYU 40.59 ▲ 2.33% USD/PYG 6,196 ▲ 2.33% USD/BOB 11.59 ▼ 0.37% USD/DOP 60.59 ▲ 1.85% USD/CRC 442.74 ▼ 0.10% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 2.06% USD/HNL 26.91 ▲ 2.15% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 2.73% USD/VES 909.35 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.69 ▲ 1.39% USD/TTD 6.75 ▲ 1.58% EUR/BRL 6.25 ▲ 0.93% BRENT 95.84 ▲ 0.02% WTI 88.56 ▼ 0.20% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.09 ▼ 1.50% GOLD 3,886 ▲ 0.03% SILVER 49.12 ▼ 1.70% SOY 1,232 ▲ 0.37% CORN 445.50 ▲ 0.68% WHEAT 593.25 ▲ 1.54% COFFEE 279.25 ▼ 0.34% SUGAR 18.40 ▲ 0.99% ORANGE JUICE 136.85 ▼ 2.91% COTTON 79.02 ▲ 0.44% COCOA 5,123 ▲ 1.13% BEEF 224.80 ▲ 2.70% CATTLE 335.35 ▼ 0.10% LITHIUM 58.76 ▼ 1.13% PETR4 45.30 ▲ 1.34% VALE3 63.50 ▼ 0.70% ITUB4 42.27 ▲ 1.42% BBDC4 14.52 ▲ 1.40% ABEV3 15.79 ▲ 0.25% BBAS3 15.10 ▼ 2.45% B3SA3 14.89 ▲ 0.88% WEGE3 51.31 ▼ 0.66% PRIO3 63.30 — 0.00% SUZB3 54.77 ▼ 2.27% RENT3 30.07 ▲ 1.66% AZZA3 15.91 ▼ 5.86% CSAN3 3.10 ▲ 8.77% RAIZ4 20.00 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.56 ▲ 7.11% GMAT3 4.25 ▲ 10.68% PSSA3 46.41 ▲ 1.02% CVCB3 0.83 ▼ 1.19% POSI3 3.15 ▼ 6.53% SLCE3 18.28 ▼ 0.44% NATU3 5.13 ▼ 3.75% BRKM5 3.02 ▼ 1.63% RANI3 8.18 — 0.00% CSNA3 3.72 ▼ 12.06%
since 2009
Saturday, November 14, 2026

Africa Politics and Society

South Africa Paid a Beauty School US$8.8 Million; Audit Flags Insider Deals

By · · 6 min read
Johannesburg skyline seen from a highway, Gauteng province, South Africa
The Johannesburg skyline seen from a highway in Gauteng, South Africa’s richest province (Photo: Khaanya96, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons)

Key Facts

  • The country South Africa has about 65 million people and a US$427 billion economy, a little smaller than Denmark’s. Gauteng, home to Johannesburg and Pretoria, is its richest province.
  • Why it matters Provinces run welfare with public money. Gauteng’s social development department funds nonprofits that care for children, older people and the poor, so every grant competes with basic care.
  • Why now On Monday, 28 September, the investigative outlet GroundUp reported on a draft forensic report it obtained and grant records it won in court. They show where one beauty school’s money went.
  • What happened The department paid Beauty Hub Academy about US$8.8 million from 2017/18 to 2023/24 to train 1,800 beauticians and hairdressers.
  • The numbers In 2023/24 the school got about US$1.8 million. An average child and youth care centre got about US$158,000.
  • What it means for you Investors and firms dealing with South African provinces should expect weak grant controls. Checking beneficial owners and related parties is essential.
  • Still open Disciplinary cases against four senior officials, recommended in April 2024, are unfinished. No recovery of money has been announced.

Gauteng beauty training grants worth about US$8.8 million are under scrutiny in South Africa. A forensic audit found welfare subsidies for a nonprofit school passed to a private company run by the school’s own officials.

Free daily brief — no card needed
Get every Africa story in one morning email
We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.

Gauteng is South Africa’s economic heartland, home to Johannesburg and Pretoria. Its welfare department paid Beauty Hub Academy R144 million (about US$8.8 million) from the 2017/18 to the 2023/24 financial year.

That made the academy one of the department’s highest-funded organisations. An April 2024 forensic report by audit firm FSG Africa found subsidies moved to a for-profit company with the same name.

Where the money went

The grants were meant to train 1,800 beauticians and hairdressers at sites in Johannesburg, Tshwane, Carletonville and the Lenasia military base. Tshwane is the metropolitan area that includes Pretoria, the capital.

In 2017/18 the academy received R14 million (about US$853,000) for 150 students. By 2023/24 it received R30 million (about US$1.8 million) for 500 students, the department’s second-largest grant that year.

The average child and youth care centre received R2.6 million (about US$158,000) that year. The academy also received R14 million (about US$853,000) between 2017 and 2023 for beauty services at old age homes.

Rand figures are converted at R16.41 per US dollar, the open.er-api.com rate for 29 September 2026.

What the audit found

FSG Africa found the nonprofit periodically paid department subsidies to Beauty Hub Academy (Pty) Ltd, a private company, without the department’s approval. Private, for-profit companies are not eligible for this funding.

The private company’s two directors, Joel Nkomo and Daisy Gama, were also the nonprofit’s principal and treasurer. The auditors called it “strange” that the 2021/22 and 2022/23 accounts combined both entities.

The academy rented its headquarters for almost R1.2 million (about US$73,000) over three years from Sehlule Properties. Nkomo and Gama are directors of that company.

It also rented two vehicles from the private company for R50,576 (about US$3,080) a month. The department separately funded two property renovations in 2022 of R750,000 (about US$45,700) each.

Between 2020 and 2023 the academy paid R8.4 million (about US$512,000) for catering to a company owned by Gama’s daughter. The auditors said Gama did not recuse herself when the board approved that contract in 2019.

After a site inspection, FSG was satisfied the academy had systems to manage its affairs. Its concerns were conflicts of interest, related-party transactions and breaches of the nonprofit’s own policies.

How the records came out

The department is supposed to publish details of the nonprofits it funds, but has not done so for years. GroundUp, a South African investigative news site, asked for the records under the country’s access-to-information law.

The request was refused, and GroundUp won an appeal in the Western Cape High Court. It published its findings on Monday, 28 September, and Daily Maverick, a national news site, carried the report.

Daily Maverick had reported a malpractice probe into the grant in January 2024. GroundUp says the Beauty Hub story is the first of three on the department’s forensic audits.

The officials named in the report

FSG said department leaders failed to oversee the grants and approved multimillion-rand payments without checking whether projects were viable. It recommended disciplinary action against four senior officials.

They are Onkemetse Kabasia, Solly Ndweni, Themba Msimanga and Mbali Ndlovu. Kabasia, then a deputy director-general, recommended a R6 million (about US$366,000) grant in 2022/23 that the academy had not formally applied for.

Msimanga, then director of partnerships and funding, approved budget deviations of over R7 million (about US$427,000) in 2023 without authority. Kabasia now heads the social development department in KwaZulu-Natal province.

The auditors said two officials’ phones had been reset to factory settings before hand-over. They recommended charges for destroying evidence, and a charge against Kabasia for not unlocking his phone.

Where the case stands

The officials were suspended under a previous provincial social development minister, Mbali Hlophe, but returned to work after her term ended. The disciplinary processes are still not complete more than two years later.

Department spokesperson Motsamai Motlhaolwa told GroundUp the processes are ongoing. He said four officials got final written warnings, one was not recharged for lack of evidence and hearings for eight others continue.

Kabasia, Msimanga, Nkomo and Gama did not respond to GroundUp’s questions. A public-sector union speaking for Ndlovu and Ndweni said they had not seen the report.

What to watch next

The department stopped funding the academy in the 2024/25 financial year after the audit. It has not announced any plan to recover money from the Gauteng beauty training grants.

GroundUp has two more reports on the department’s audits to come. For foreign investors, the case shows why due diligence on South African public partners must cover related companies.

For wider context, see our pillar on Africa: The New Scramble.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did Gauteng pay Beauty Hub Academy?

Gauteng’s Department of Social Development paid the academy R144 million (about US$8.8 million) between 2017/18 and 2023/24. The Gauteng beauty training grants were meant for 1,800 beauticians and hairdressers.

What did the forensic audit find?

FSG Africa found subsidies were paid from the nonprofit academy to a for-profit company with the same name, without department approval. It also flagged rent and catering deals with companies linked to directors.

Is the academy still receiving funding?

No. The department stopped funding the academy in the 2024/25 financial year after the audit findings.

Have any officials been disciplined?

The auditors recommended action against four senior officials. More than two years later those cases have not been completed, and the officials returned to work.

RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

Connected Coverage

Sources

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.