IBOV 185,147.15 ▼ 0.02% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,163.64 ▼ 0.42% MERVAL 3,049,121 ▼ 0.29% COLCAP 2,544.56 ▲ 0.40% BVL PERÚ 59,978.22 ▼ 0.31% USD/BRL5.12▲ 0.31% USD/MXN16.88▼ 0.24% USD/CLP933.68▲ 0.29% USD/COP3,124▼ 1.12% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.34% USD/ARS1,509▲ 0.01% USD/UYU40.24▲ 1.26% USD/PYG5,947▲ 2.52% USD/BOB12.40▲ 3.51% USD/DOP59.00▲ 0.85% USD/CRC448.67▲ 1.62% USD/GTQ7.63▲ 2.29% USD/HNL26.84▲ 0.28% USD/NIO36.62▲ 0.07% USD/VES805.37▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71▲ 0.91% EUR/BRL5.95▲ 0.91% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 185,147.15 ▼ 0.02% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 65,163.64 ▼ 0.42% MERVAL 3,049,121 ▼ 0.29% COLCAP 2,544.56 ▲ 0.40% BVL PERÚ 59,978.22 ▼ 0.31% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Friday, September 4, 2026

Brazil Brazil Tax reform

FIRJAN Study Claims Brazilian Tax Reform Could Generate 300,000 Jobs Per Year

By · September 23, 2019 · 3 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – The Brazilian tax system, regarded as complex, bureaucratic and outdated, could generate billionaire gains for society only by redesigning the tax collection structure.

Calculations prepared by the Federation of Industries of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FIRJAN) show that the two tax reform proposals – under discussion in Congress – have the potential to generate 300,000 jobs per year and increase consumption by up to R$122.7 billion (US$30.67 billion).

“Brazilians will have more money for consumption because there will be a reduction in the burden on families,” says former deputy Luiz Carlos Hauly.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →
RT
Ask Rio Times
Latin American markets, currencies and companies.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

The work was based on a methodology developed over a year and does not anticipate changes in the tax rates.

In order to reach the result, both Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) 45, based on a study by economist Bernard Appy, and PEC 110, made by deputy Luiz Carlos Hauly, were examined. The administration has not yet submitted its formal proposal.

“Our goal was to assess the reform’s impact on the population’s well-being through income, consumption and job creation,” says FIRJAN’s Economy Manager, Jonathas Goulart.

According to him, it was also important to understand the effects of creating a single value added tax including federal, state and local taxes, as opposed to one embracing only federal taxes and another for state and municipal taxes (ICMS and ISS).

“We perceive a significant difference. If everything is included, the gain in consumption is three times greater”, says Eduardo Eugenio Gouvêa Vieira, president of the federation.

Without including states and municipalities in the new VAT, the increase in consumption drops to only R$39 billion, according to FIRJAN. The gap between the numbers, Vieira notes, is proof that half a reform makes no sense.

“Therefore, the governors need to understand that this is income for them as well. It’s a boomerang effect,” says the executive, pointing out that “half” a reform is terrible for the Brazilian population.

VAT

On average, the two proposals in Congress bring similar gains for the population (around R$122 billion), since they provide for the introduction of a single tax in the form of the Value Added Tax (VAT) used abroad.

On average, the two proposals in Congress bring similar gains for the population (around R$122 billion), since they provide for the introduction of a single tax in the form of the Value Added Tax (VAT) used abroad.

The difference is that, in the case of Deputy Appy’s proposal, the states may have differentiated rates; and in Hauly’s, the rate is the same throughout the country, explains Goulart.

“The simulations show that all regions would have consumption gains. But some may have less than others,” says the manager of FIRJAN. He also calculated what the impact would be if there were a partial exemption from payroll taxes.

The simulation foresees a 40 percent cut, which would be included in the single tax. In this case, the gain would increase from R$122 billion to R$136 billion.

Greater potential

Nevertheless, Appy and Hauly claim that the tax reform may have a far greater impact than FIRJAN expected.

“At first glance, I see growth between 5 percent and 6 percent of GDP (Gross Domestic Product),” says former deputy Luiz Carlos Hauly. He explains that his proposal reduces the tax burden and will release something around R$640 billion in product prices.

“Brazilians will have more money for consumption because there will be a reduction in the burden on families.”

For Appy, the reform’s effects on the economy should be presented next week, but he believes it will be greater than FIRJAN’s calculations. According to him, his proposal aims to reduce bureaucracy, tax litigation, and investment costs.

It will additionally increase economic competitiveness by reducing the costs of exports and domestic production in relation to imports. “But the main thing is that it will remove allocative distortions (generated by tax incentives) from the economy.”

For the full picture, see our Brazil Tax Reform: Complete Guide.

This article was drafted with automated assistance and reviewed before publication. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.