Petrobras Never Left Bolivia. Now La Paz Wants It Back Anyway
Energy
Key Facts
—The announcement. Bolivia’s hydrocarbons minister Marcelo Blanco said technical working groups with Petrobras open next week, covering exploration, production, transport, refining and marketing.
—Not a return. Petrobras already operates in Bolivia, taking part in San Alberto, San Antonio, Itaú and the San Telmo Norte exploration area, all under service contracts with the state firm YPFB.
—The awkward part. Two other areas it works, Colpa and Caranda in Santa Cruz, are in the process of being handed back to YPFB.
—No numbers. Asked about investment and timing, Blanco said he would give neither, adding that he never provides exact values or dates.
—Why 2006 still matters. Supreme Decree 28,701 nationalised hydrocarbons and lifted the state’s take on the biggest gas fields to a total of 82%, after which Petrobras suspended new investment.
—The unknown. YPFB’s president says a firm delivers a long-delayed report on Bolivia’s oil and gas reserves next week, covering the position at the end of last year.
This week’s Petrobras Bolivia story is being told as a homecoming. The detail that makes it interesting is that the Brazilian company never actually went away.
On Wednesday a Bolivian delegation flew to Brazil to meet Magda Chambriard, the chief executive of Petrobras. It included the hydrocarbons minister, the economy minister and the head of YPFB, the Bolivian state oil company.
The minister, Marcelo Blanco, announced the outcome on social media with a single exclamation: Petrobras returns to Bolivia. On Thursday he told reporters that technical working groups would open the following week, to look at a wider role across exploration, production, transport, refining and marketing.
What the Petrobras Bolivia announcement leaves out
Petrobras has never stopped operating in Bolivia. It currently runs the San Alberto and San Antonio gas fields, and takes part in the Itaú field and the San Telmo Norte exploration area in Tarija, all under service contracts signed with YPFB.
It also works two areas in Santa Cruz, Colpa and Caranda. Those two, according to the Bolivian newspaper Correo del Sur, are in the process of being handed back to the state company.
So in the same week a minister announces the Brazilian company’s return, the company is giving up two Bolivian fields. Both things are true, and only one of them was tweeted.
What Petrobras did stop, twenty years ago, was investing. The distinction matters, because a company that operates a field for someone else is a contractor, while one that invests in it is a partner.
The decree that ended the last partnership
In May 2006 the government of Evo Morales issued Supreme Decree 28,701 and nationalised the country’s hydrocarbon resources. Foreign producers had to transfer ownership of everything they pumped to YPFB.
The terms were harshest for the biggest fields, and Petrobras operated two of them. In its annual accounts filed with the US securities regulator, Petrobras recorded that San Alberto and San Antonio would carry an extra payment to YPFB. That lifted the Bolivian state’s interest to a total of eighty-two percent, since each field produced above the decree’s threshold.
Under the contracts that followed, YPFB took the revenues, royalties and taxes, and reimbursed the companies for their production costs and investments. Petrobras stayed, ran the fields, and stopped putting fresh money into the ground.
It never left the Bolivian gas business entirely, though, because it kept buying. The company stayed authorised to import Bolivian natural gas into Brazil across the border crossing points, which is a customer relationship rather than an investor’s one.
Why Bolivia needs this and Brazil does not
The asymmetry is the whole negotiation. Bolivia was once an energy exporter, and years of falling gas production have drained its hard currency and left drivers queuing for fuel.
President Rodrigo Paz, who took office late last year, is trying to reopen the country to foreign energy capital and revive trade with Brazil. His spokesman said Petrobras had shown immense interest in rebuilding deep ties in the sector.
Petrobras, for its part, is spending its exploration budget elsewhere, having just completed the purchase of an offshore block in São Tomé and Príncipe. Bolivia is an option for it, and an emergency for Bolivia.
Blanco was refreshingly blunt about how little has been agreed. He said he would not give numbers, that he would not be irresponsible, and that he never provides exact values or dates.
The report that arrives next week
There is a second document due in the same seven days, and it may matter more than the working groups. YPFB’s president, Sebastián Daroca, said a firm will deliver its final report on Bolivia’s oil and gas reserves as they stood at the end of last year.
Bolivia has been criticised for years over delays in publishing updated reserves data. That has left outsiders guessing at how much gas is actually left, and analysts and industry groups are watching closely.
The government intends to use those numbers to discuss how production might be raised in coming years. No oil company commits capital to a country whose reserves it cannot size, which is why the sequence here runs backwards.
The tables open first and the geology arrives afterwards. Investors should treat next week’s reserves report, not the working groups, as the thing that decides whether any of this becomes money.
Is Petrobras Bolivia a genuinely new investment?
Not yet, because nothing has been committed. The two governments have agreed to open technical working groups, and the Bolivian minister declined to name any investment figure or timeline.
Why did Petrobras stop investing in Bolivia?
Because the 2006 nationalisation transferred ownership of production to the state and raised its take on the largest gas fields to eighty-two percent. Petrobras kept operating its fields as a contractor under service contracts, but committed no new capital.
What should an investor watch next?
The reserves report due next week, above all. It sets the ceiling on what any partnership can be worth, and Bolivia’s long delay in publishing such data is why foreign capital has stayed away.
Background: Petrobras Bets $1.2 Billion on Jet Fuel Made From Plants.
More: Bolivia news in English, every day from The Rio Times.
Live Company IntelligencePetroleo Brasileiro Petrobras SA ADR — the full investor dossier
Wall Street view
Valuation & profitability
Price & risk
$10.6552-wk high
$21.44
Revenue trend · 6y
Ownership
Dividend
Frequently Asked Questions
Has Petrobras actually agreed to invest new money in Bolivia?
No, nothing has been committed yet. The two sides have only agreed to open technical working groups, and Bolivia’s hydrocarbons minister Marcelo Blanco refused to give any investment figures or timelines.
Did Petrobras ever really leave Bolivia?
No, Petrobras never stopped operating in Bolivia. It currently runs the San Alberto and San Antonio gas fields and takes part in the Itaú field and the San Telmo Norte exploration area, all under service contracts with the state firm YPFB. What it did stop, after the 2006 nationalisation, was investing new money in the country.
Why does Bolivia’s upcoming reserves report matter so much?
No oil company will commit money to a country until it knows how much oil and gas is in the ground. Bolivia has been criticised for years over delays in publishing updated reserves data. YPFB’s president says a firm will deliver its final report on reserves as they stood at the end of last year, and the government plans to use those numbers to discuss how production could be raised.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
Read More from The Rio Times