IBOV 172,470.78 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,905.78 ▲ 0.05% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL5.56▼ 0.40% USD/MXN18.62▼ 0.05% USD/CLP983.68▼ 0.06% USD/COP3,274— 0.00% USD/PEN3.41▼ 0.03% USD/ARS1,547▲ 0.05% USD/UYU40.52▲ 3.70% USD/PYG6,174▲ 1.84% USD/BOB11.63▲ 0.92% USD/DOP60.83▲ 0.71% USD/CRC446.01▲ 1.66% USD/GTQ7.64▲ 3.18% USD/HNL26.90▲ 0.20% USD/NIO36.62▲ 1.17% USD/VES899.36▼ 0.13% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD157.49▲ 2.33% USD/TTD6.72▲ 2.23% EUR/BRL6.17▼ 0.15% BRENT 93.02 ▲ 1.67% WTI 86.99 ▲ 1.10% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.30 ▲ 1.33% GOLD 4,011 ▼ 0.47% SILVER 52.18 ▲ 2.11% SOY 1,234 ▲ 0.80% CORN 447.25 ▼ 0.39% WHEAT 599.50 ▲ 1.14% COFFEE 265.20 ▼ 2.28% SUGAR 18.45 ▲ 1.99% ORANGE JUICE 146.40 ▼ 0.24% COTTON 82.35 ▲ 4.65% COCOA 5,043 ▲ 6.35% BEEF 218.23 ▼ 0.44% CATTLE 327.25 ▼ 0.94% LITHIUM 61.38 ▲ 2.33% PETR4 44.23 ▼ 1.60% VALE3 64.29 ▼ 0.79% ITUB4 41.77 ▲ 1.38% BBDC4 14.54 — 0.00% ABEV3 15.81 ▲ 0.13% BBAS3 17.14 ▲ 0.23% B3SA3 14.75 ▲ 1.86% WEGE3 51.98 ▲ 2.02% PRIO3 61.84 ▲ 3.03% SUZB3 54.18 ▼ 0.51% RENT3 30.19 ▲ 1.34% AZZA3 15.13 ▲ 2.72% CSAN3 2.93 ▲ 9.33% RAIZ4 0.30 ▼ 98.77% PCAR3 2.55 ▼ 0.39% GMAT3 3.94 ▲ 3.41% PSSA3 45.97 ▼ 1.50% CVCB3 0.88 ▲ 2.33% POSI3 3.27 ▲ 3.81% SLCE3 17.18 ▲ 0.53% NATU3 5.59 ▲ 0.72% BRKM5 2.94 ▲ 0.68% RANI3 8.50 ▲ 0.59% CSNA3 4.40 ▲ 0.46% IBOV 172,470.78 ▲ 0.66% IPC MEX 71,905.78 ▲ 0.05% MERVAL 2,848,945 — — USD/BRL 5.56 ▼ 0.40% USD/MXN 18.62 ▼ 0.04% USD/CLP 983.88 ▼ 0.04% USD/COP 3,282 ▲ 0.24% USD/PEN 3.41 ▼ 0.03% USD/ARS 1,547 ▲ 0.05% USD/UYU 40.52 ▲ 3.70% USD/PYG 6,174 ▲ 1.84% USD/BOB 11.63 ▲ 0.92% USD/DOP 60.83 ▲ 0.71% USD/CRC 446.01 ▲ 1.66% USD/GTQ 7.64 ▲ 3.18% USD/HNL 26.90 ▲ 0.20% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 1.17% USD/VES 899.36 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.49 ▲ 2.33% USD/TTD 6.72 ▲ 2.23% EUR/BRL 6.17 ▼ 0.15% BRENT 93.02 ▲ 1.67% WTI 86.99 ▲ 1.10% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.30 ▲ 1.33% GOLD 4,011 ▼ 0.47% SILVER 52.18 ▲ 2.11% SOY 1,234 ▲ 0.80% CORN 447.25 ▼ 0.39% WHEAT 599.50 ▲ 1.14% COFFEE 265.20 ▼ 2.28% SUGAR 18.45 ▲ 1.99% ORANGE JUICE 146.40 ▼ 0.24% COTTON 82.35 ▲ 4.65% COCOA 5,043 ▲ 6.35% BEEF 218.23 ▼ 0.44% CATTLE 327.25 ▼ 0.94% LITHIUM 61.38 ▲ 2.33% PETR4 44.23 ▼ 1.60% VALE3 64.29 ▼ 0.79% ITUB4 41.77 ▲ 1.38% BBDC4 14.54 — 0.00% ABEV3 15.81 ▲ 0.13% BBAS3 17.14 ▲ 0.23% B3SA3 14.75 ▲ 1.86% WEGE3 51.98 ▲ 2.02% PRIO3 61.84 ▲ 3.03% SUZB3 54.18 ▼ 0.51% RENT3 30.19 ▲ 1.34% AZZA3 15.13 ▲ 2.72% CSAN3 2.93 ▲ 9.33% RAIZ4 0.30 ▼ 98.77% PCAR3 2.55 ▼ 0.39% GMAT3 3.94 ▲ 3.41% PSSA3 45.97 ▼ 1.50% CVCB3 0.88 ▲ 2.33% POSI3 3.27 ▲ 3.81% SLCE3 17.18 ▲ 0.53% NATU3 5.59 ▲ 0.72% BRKM5 2.94 ▲ 0.68% RANI3 8.50 ▲ 0.59% CSNA3 4.40 ▲ 0.46%
since 2009
Wednesday, November 11, 2026

U.S. Panel Calls for End to China’s Trade Privileges Amid Intellectual Property Theft

By · · 2 min read

The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission has recommended repealing China’s preferential trade status. This marks a significant shift in US trade policy towards China.

The commission argues that China benefits unfairly from current trade terms despite engaging in questionable practices. China received permanent normal trade relations (PNTR) status in 2000.

This allowed China to enjoy the same trade benefits as US allies. In exchange, China promised to open its markets and reform its trade practices. However, concerns have grown over China’s adherence to these commitments.

Free daily brief — no card needed
Get every China story in one morning email
We build you a personalized brief around the topics you follow — free for 7 days. Love it? Your first month after that is US$1.

The commission’s report highlights issues like intellectual property theft and market manipulation. These practices have long frustrated US policymakers and businesses.

Revoking PNTR status could give the US more leverage in addressing these concerns. If implemented, this change would likely lead to higher tariffs on Chinese goods.

U.S. Panel Calls for End to China's Trade Privileges Amid Intellectual Property Theft
U.S. Panel Calls for End to China’s Trade Privileges Amid Intellectual Property Theft.
RT
Ask Rio Times
17 years of Latin America reporting, on demand.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →

It could also trigger annual reviews of China’s trade practices. This would resemble the system in place before China received PNTR status.

The LatAm Brief

One email, every weekday morning. What moved in Latin American markets, politics and expat life.

Yesterday’s subject line: “Petrobras to pay shareholders US$2.7 billion”

Free. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you click it. Unsubscribe with one click in any edition. If you stop opening us for 30 days we stop sending by ourselves, as we assume the interest is no longer there. See our privacy policy. We never share your email.

Escalating US-China Trade Tensions

The economic impact of such a move could be substantial. Tariffs on Chinese imports might rise significantly, potentially up to 60%. This could increase prices for US consumers and businesses reliant on Chinese products.

China might retaliate with its own tariffs on US exports. This could escalate into a trade war, harming both economies. Some estimates suggest the US could lose $158.7 billion in GDP from such a scenario.

Intellectual property theft remains a key issue in US-China trade relations. The FBI estimates US businesses lose hundreds of billions annually due to Chinese infringement.

This has fueled calls for stronger measures against what some view as state-sponsored economic espionage. China’s approach to intellectual property rights has evolved but remains problematic.

Enforcement of IP laws in China is often inconsistent, especially at local levels. Reports indicate that a large majority of counterfeit goods originate from China.

The commission’s recommendation reflects growing frustration with China’s trade practices. It aligns with a broader trend of reassessing US-China economic ties.

This shift began under the Trump administration and has continued under President Biden. Critics of the current trade relationship argue it has led to job losses in US manufacturing.

They also cite national security concerns related to critical supply chains. Supporters of the status quo warn that major changes could disrupt global trade and harm US businesses.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated AI newsroom. Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. The Rio Times also runs Ask Rio Times, which answers from 100,000+ of our own articles, the daily Latin America Power Map, and prediction-market odds on elections and markets.. How we use AI · Report an error

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map →

Brazil runoff date: Sunday, October 25, poll closing times and when results start · Brazil runoff polls: Flávio 51%, Lula 49% · Kalshi and Polymarket odds

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.