JBS Drops 2040 Net-Zero Goal After a Greenwashing Settlement
Companies
Key Facts
—The move. JBS, the world’s largest meat company, has dropped its 2021 pledge to reach net-zero emissions across its value chain by 2040.
—What it dropped. The new report removes targets for Scope 3 emissions, which are more than 90% of the company’s footprint.
—What it kept. It holds a goal to cut the intensity of its own operational emissions by 30% by 2030, and by 70% by 2050.
—The scale. Those operational emissions, Scope 1 and 2, were under 4% of the total in 2025.
—The backdrop. In November JBS settled a New York lawsuit that called the net-zero claim misleading, paying about $1.1m.
—The company. JBS listed in New York in 2025 and joined a major US stock index this year.
The JBS net-zero pledge was one of the boldest in the food industry. This week the company quietly took it apart, keeping only the small part it can easily control.
JBS is a Brazilian company and the largest meat processor on earth. Five years ago it promised to reach net-zero emissions across its entire supply chain by 2040.
That promise is now gone from its climate plan. What replaces it is far narrower, and the timing tells its own story.
What the JBS net-zero reversal actually changes
To see why this matters, it helps to know how emissions are counted. Companies split them into three buckets, called scopes.
Scope 1 and 2 are a company’s own operations and the energy it buys. Scope 3 is everything else in the value chain, and for a meat company that means the cattle it slaughters and the feed they eat.
According to the trade outlet Just Food, JBS has removed its Scope 3 targets entirely. That is the part that matters, because Scope 3 is more than ninety percent of its total emissions.
What survives is a goal for its own operations. JBS still aims to cut the intensity of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions by thirty percent by 2030, and by seventy percent by 2050, against a 2019 baseline.
The scale of what it kept is telling. Those operational emissions were under four percent of the company’s footprint last year, so the surviving target covers the small slice and abandons the large one.
How JBS explains the net-zero retreat
The company frames it as discipline, not retreat. Its chief sustainability officer said JBS was setting goals in areas where it has operational control.
He argued that bold ambition is fine, but a company now needs measurable, accountable goals. The logic is that JBS cannot force change on hundreds of thousands of independent farms it buys from.
Critics see an evasion rather than a refinement. A Greenpeace campaigner said the company’s supply chain makes it responsible for methane emissions exceeding those of Shell and ExxonMobil combined, and called dropping the Scope 3 goal reckless.
The legal shadow over the decision
The reversal does not happen in a vacuum. Last November JBS settled a lawsuit brought by the New York attorney general, whose office alleged the meatpacker had misled the public with its net-zero claim.
The suit argued the company set the goal before it had even calculated its emissions, and had no viable plan to hit it. JBS settled for about one and one tenth million dollars and said this reflected no admission of wrongdoing.
Seen against that, dropping the target looks less like a fresh strategy and more like closing an exposed flank. A promise a regulator has already branded misleading is a promise worth deleting.
JBS is not alone in the retreat. PepsiCo, Coca-Cola and Unilever have all softened or delayed climate goals over the past year, part of a broader corporate cooling on ambitious targets.
Live Company IntelligenceJBS N.V. — the full investor dossier
Wall Street view
Valuation & profitability
Price & risk
$11.4552-wk high
$17.27
Revenue trend · 6y
Ownership
Dividend
Why it matters for investors
The move lands at a sensitive moment for the company’s finances. JBS listed in New York in 2025 and this year entered a major United States stock index, drawing in passive investment.
That exposure cuts both ways on climate. It widens the investor base, but it also brings the scrutiny of United States regulators and the disclosure rules of markets like California.
There is a trade dimension too. European buyers increasingly demand deforestation-free supply chains, and a weaker climate posture could complicate access to those markets for Brazilian beef.
For a foreign investor the read is about credibility versus liability. Narrowing the target removes a legal risk today, but it also removes the claim that once helped JBS court climate-conscious capital.
More: Brazil news in English, every day from The Rio Times.
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly did the JBS net-zero reversal drop?
It removed its 2021 pledge to reach net-zero emissions across its whole value chain by 2040, including all targets for Scope 3 emissions. Scope 3, which covers the livestock it processes and their feed, makes up more than ninety percent of the company’s total footprint.
What climate goals does JBS still have?
It kept targets for its own operations, aiming to cut the intensity of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions by thirty percent by 2030 and by seventy percent by 2050, against a 2019 baseline. Those operational emissions were under four percent of its total footprint in 2025.
Is this linked to the New York lawsuit?
JBS settled a New York attorney general suit in November that alleged its net-zero claim was misleading, paying about one and one tenth million dollars without admitting wrongdoing. The company frames the target change as sharpening its focus, but it follows that settlement and heightened regulatory scrutiny.
This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error
LatAm Markets: Live Signals → — real-time movers, turnover leaders and FX across Latin America.
Read More from The Rio Times