The Wall Street Journal Proposes Dollarizing the Argentine Economy

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – Argentina got into trouble again, as it often has done. The prospect of the Peronists regaining power caused Argentines to flee from the peso to the dollar, and on Monday the center-right government of Mauricio Macri imposed exchange controls. There is a better idea here: replace the peso with the US dollar as Argentina’s legal currency.

Thus begins the editorial published last Thursday by the prestigious US newspaper The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), in which it suggested to the President a concept to “break the horrendous cycle” of economic crisis and become “the leader who dared to defend Argentine savings”.

The article, signed by the newspaper’s Editorial Board and titled A Dollar for Argentina, begins with a review of the political and economic events that occurred in recent months and resulted in the capital control and debt reshaping economic measures announced by the government.

“Elections are in October, but the August primary victory of leftist populists Alberto Fernandez and Cristina Kirchner triggered a monetary panic. The demand for dollars has risen, the peso has devalued by 20 percent and the Central Bank’s reserves continue to decline,” the text says.

For the WSJ, a publication focused on the economy and the business world, Macri’s “Peronist” measures “did nothing to restore the government’s credibility. Concurrently, Fernandez “is promoting the notion of chaos,” asserting that the country is in “virtual default”.

“Those proposing dollarization find resistance in Peronism, which depends on inflation to finance populism when its income is low,” he says.

However, the newspaper adds, “the demand for dollars suggests that Macri could count on popular support to adopt the dollar as the national currency”: “Argentine lawyers differ on the legality of a dollarization according to the Constitution, but our sources believe Macri could dollarize with the backing of a majority in Congress”.

One objection to dollarization, it explains, “is that Argentina would lose the benefits of a central bank by printing its own currency, known as ‘seigniorage'”: “But that is a political excuse disguised as economics. What is lost of seigniorage will be more than offset by the end of the peso crisis.

“Establishing the right exchange rate is also important. Several Argentine economists propose converting short-term securities into long-term bonds to reduce the amount of pesos that must be exchanged for dollars in the coming months. But the best rate is probably that of the black market, where the peso is now quoted,” it stresses.

“Dollarization removes the moral risk that Central Bank bailouts foster in the banking system; when international capital markets become the lender of last resort. Another benefit is that it would be almost impossible to reverse, unlike the ‘one-to-one’ convertibility of the 1990s, which politicians violated when they were again in debt in the early 2000s. Argentines should also have the right to keep their dollars abroad if they wish. That would ease the fear that the government would freeze their bank accounts, as they did in 2001,” it recalls.

And it closes with additional criticism of Peronism: “Macri’s decision to dollarize would break this horrible cycle by giving Argentines a reserve of value and a currency they can trust. Maybe it wouldn’t save his presidency, but it would grant him the legacy of being the leader who dared to defend Argentina’s savings from a future prowling government”.