Suez Canal Revenue Climbs 13% as Tankers Return to the Red Sea

EGYPT · TRADE

Suez Canal revenue rose 13% to US$1.26 billion in the second quarter of 2026, the best three months since early 2024, as ships began edging back onto the Red Sea route. Traffic and tonnage both improved, though the waterway is still carrying far less than it did before the diversions began.

What the Suez Canal revenue figures show

Egypt’s statistics agency, CAPMAS, put second-quarter canal revenue at US$1.26 billion. That is 13% above the roughly US$1.1 billion collected in the first quarter and the highest quarterly total since the first quarter of 2024.

The monthly pattern points the same way. June generated US$446 million against US$414 million in May.

Volumes rose alongside receipts. The number of transiting vessels increased 7.7% to 3,580, while total net tonnage jumped 18.3% to about 169 million tonnes from 142.9 million.

Tonnage growing more than twice as fast as ship numbers is the detail worth holding on to. Bigger vessels are returning, not just more of them.

Tankers came back first

The clearest single driver was oil. Tanker transits rose 22.3% year on year to 1,526 vessels, from 1,248 in the same quarter of 2025.

Higher crude exports from Gulf producers supplied the cargo, and changing security conditions across the Red Sea and the Gulf region made the passage more attractive again.

Tanker owners have generally been quicker than container lines to test the route. Their voyages are shorter, their charters are more flexible and their insurance arithmetic differs from that of a liner running a fixed weekly schedule.

Container carriers move on a different clock. Once a network has been rebuilt around the Cape of Good Hope, switching back is a scheduling decision that takes months rather than days.

Why this is not yet a recovery

The comparison that matters is not with last quarter but with 2023. Traffic through the canal collapsed after attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea pushed many operators to sail around southern Africa.

That rerouting adds roughly ten days and thousands of nautical miles to an Asia–Europe voyage. It also removed a large slice of Egypt’s hard-currency income at a moment when the country could least afford it.

Second-quarter figures show the recovery that began in late 2025 gathering pace, but from a deep hole. The Suez Canal Authority has leaned on commercial incentives, discounts and operational flexibility to coax operators back.

Whether the second half improves further depends on things Cairo does not control. Regional maritime security, freight economics and the confidence of global carriers all sit outside Egyptian policy.

What it means for Egypt

Canal receipts are one of the four pillars of Egypt’s foreign-currency earnings, alongside tourism, workers’ remittances and merchandise exports. When one pillar weakens, the pressure lands on the pound.

Restoring even part of that income eases a constraint that has shaped Egyptian economic policy for three years. It also improves the arithmetic behind the country’s external financing needs.

Egypt has spent the period courting other sources of hard currency, including Gulf and Chinese capital and asset sales to foreign banks. Canal revenue is the one line that requires no counterparty and no negotiation, only ships.

For an economy of Egypt’s size, that makes the quarterly canal figure a genuine macro indicator rather than a transport statistic.

What it means for everyone else

In normal conditions the canal carries about 12% of world seaborne trade. Its throughput is therefore a live reading on how safe the Red Sea is judged to be.

For importers and exporters, a functioning Suez means shorter transit times and lower freight and insurance costs. For African economies dependent on European and Asian trade, it also means cheaper inputs.

The waterway sits at the junction of two contests, one over shipping security and one over who finances and controls the infrastructure of African trade. The Rio Times follows the second in Africa: The New Scramble.

The second-quarter number is best read as a signal rather than a verdict. Ships are testing the route again, and they have not yet committed to it.

Frequently asked questions

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error