Latin American Pulse for February 6, 2026
Executive Summary
Read about Latin American Pulse for February 6, 2026 on The Rio Times.
\n
\n
\n
Executive Summary
This is part of The Rio Times’ comprehensive coverage of Latin American financial markets and economic developments.
\n
The Big Picture: Beijing moved from rhetoric to retaliation on Thursday, ordering state firms to freeze new projects in Panama and directing shipping companies to consider rerouting cargo away from the canal—the most concrete economic countermeasures since the Supreme Court voided CK Hutchison’s port concessions last week.
\n
Panama now faces the full weight of great-power competition, caught between Washington’s applause and Beijing’s punishment.
\n
In Brazil, Itaú Unibanco delivered blockbuster Q4 results—R$12.3 billion in net profit with a 24.4% ROE, the best since 2015—providing a lifeline to the Ibovespa after Wednesday’s sharp 2.1% selloff.
\n
President Lula’s interview with UOL added political noise, with markets parsing his comments on minimum wage and Central Bank appointments.
\n
Mexico’s oil standoff with Washington entered a new negotiating phase: Reuters reported near-daily talks between Mexican and U.S. officials, with Mexico exploring a “humanitarian aid” classification for fuel shipments to Cuba that could include a gasoline tanker within days if an agreement is reached.
\n
\n
\n
\n
Uruguay’s Orsi wrapped up the Shanghai leg of his China visit with business and trade promotion events. And Peru’s bishops confirmed with greater specificity that Pope Leo XIV’s visit is targeted for November, with a 5–6 day itinerary and an organizing commission to be formed in March.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Risk Snapshot
\n
\n
\n
\n
| Country | Risk Signal | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | Constructive | Itaú earnings stellar, Lula interview parsed |
| Mexico | Elevated | Oil-to-Cuba talks intensify, humanitarian loophole sought |
| Argentina | Watchful | CPI release ~Feb 10 under new INDEC head |
| Colombia | Improved | U.S. considering lifting Petro from Clinton List |
| Chile | Watchful | Bachelet candidacy formalized, Kast still silent |
| Peru | Stable | Papal visit Nov/Dec, organizing commission in March |
| Panama | Critical | China freezes projects, threatens cargo rerouting |
| Uruguay | Active | Orsi in Shanghai, trip wrapping up Feb 7 |
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Panama — Beijing Moves from Words to Actions: State Firms Freeze Projects, Cargo Rerouting Considered
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —Investment Freeze: Bloomberg reported on Thursday that China has instructed state-owned enterprises to halt talks on new projects in Panama, a move that could derail potential investments worth billions of dollars. Chinese state firms are involved in several infrastructure projects across Panama, making the directive a significant escalation.
- —Cargo Rerouting: Beijing has also asked shipping companies to consider rerouting cargo through alternative ports if it does not result in significant extra costs—a direct threat to Panama’s core revenue stream from canal transit fees.
- —Customs Squeeze: Chinese customs authorities are stepping up inspections on Panamanian imports, particularly bananas and coffee, two of Panama’s key agricultural exports to China. The targeted commodities suggest a calibrated economic pressure campaign.
- —Projects Already Underway at Risk: Sources told Bloomberg that projects already in progress may also be affected, though no final instructions have been given yet. Chinese firms including China Railway Tunnel Group are involved in ongoing Panamanian infrastructure.
- —Maersk Transition: Following the court ruling, the Panamanian Maritime Authority has tapped Danish firm Maersk to temporarily take over management of the Balboa and Cristóbal port terminals until a new concession is awarded.
- —Mulino Holds Firm: President José Raúl Mulino stated Wednesday that Panama’s government respects the independence of the judiciary and, as a “country of laws,” has no interest in overriding the court system—signaling that Chinese pressure will not prompt a reversal.
- —Analysts Skeptical of Reversal: Jack Lee of China Macro Group assessed that China’s response will likely be “carefully calibrated and largely symbolic, aimed at signaling disapproval rather than forcing a policy reversal,” given Trump’s view of the canal as a strategic chokepoint.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
This is no longer a legal dispute—it is an active economic coercion campaign. China’s playbook mirrors its responses to perceived slights from other countries: freeze investment, squeeze exports through customs delays, and threaten logistics disruption.
\n
For Panama, the risks are real but manageable in the near term: China accounts for a significant share of the country’s construction sector investment, and agricultural exports to China are meaningful but not existential.
\n
The strategic calculus for Panama is clear: Washington’s security umbrella and the canal’s indispensability to U.S. supply chains make alignment with American preferences the path of least resistance.
\n
But the economic costs of Chinese retaliation will accumulate, and other Latin American governments watching from the sidelines will calibrate their own China positions accordingly.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Critical
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Live Market IntelligenceLatin America — Cross-Market Board
Rio Times · Live Market Intelligence
Latin America — Cross-Market Board
-1.20%
175,739
-1.20%
65,973
-0.79%
10,928
+0.16%
3,235,295
-1.37%
2,307.67
UNCH
56,917.82
-0.86%
| Instrument | Last | Change | YoY | Prev. | High | Low | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBOV | 175,739 | -1.20% | +29.89% | 177,866 | — | — | — |
| IPSA | 10,928 | +0.16% | — | 10,910 | 10,928 | 10,928 | — |
| IPC MEX | 65,973 | -0.79% | +17.05% | 66,496 | — | — | — |
| MERVAL | 3,235,295 | -1.37% | +56.75% | 3,280,224 | — | — | — |
| COLCAP | 2,307.67 | UNCH | — | 9.04 | 9.05 | 9.02 | 4,133 |
| BVL PERÚ | 56,917.82 | -0.86% | — | — | — | — | — |
| USD/BRL | 5.13 | -0.10% | -7.90% | 5.14 | 5.13 | 5.13 | — |
| EUR/BRL | 5.85 | +0.49% | -10.03% | 5.82 | 5.87 | 5.84 | — |
| USD/MXN | 17.51 | -0.13% | -6.17% | 17.53 | 17.53 | 17.48 | — |
| USD/CLP | 929.55 | -0.36% | -0.88% | 932.90 | 932.70 | 928.05 | — |
| USD/COP | 3,245 | -0.56% | -19.12% | 3,263 | 3,247 | 3,235 | — |
| USD/PEN | 3.40 | -0.23% | -2.11% | 3.41 | 3.41 | 3.40 | — |
| USD/ARS | 1,482 | -0.07% | +17.91% | 1,483 | 1,482 | 1,482 | — |
| USD/UYU | 40.22 | +0.96% | +0.77% | 39.84 | 40.22 | 40.22 | — |
| USD/PYG | 6,045 | +1.22% | -20.85% | 5,972 | 6,045 | 6,045 | — |
| USD/BOB | 10.35 | +6.04% | +53.28% | 9.76 | 10.35 | 10.35 | — |
| USD/DOP | 58.31 | +0.39% | -2.03% | 58.08 | 58.72 | 58.30 | — |
| USD/CRC | 448.93 | +1.31% | -8.80% | 443.11 | 448.93 | 448.53 | — |
Brazil — Itaú Delivers Best ROE Since 2015; Ibovespa Recovers from Wednesday Selloff
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —Itaú Q4 Blowout: Itaú Unibanco reported Q4 2025 recurring net profit of R$12.3 billion, up 13.2% year-over-year and 3.7% quarter-over-quarter. The consolidated recurring ROE reached 24.4% (26.0% in Brazil operations), improving 2.3 percentage points year-over-year—the bank’s highest profitability since 2015.
- —Shareholder Returns: The bank announced total dividends and interest on own capital of R$33.7 billion for fiscal 2025, representing a payout ratio of 72.0%. A new share repurchase program for up to 200 million preferred shares was also announced.
- —2026 Guidance: Itaú projects total credit portfolio growth of 5.5%–9.5%, with its Brazil portfolio growing 6.5%–10.5%. The bank’s macroeconomic assumptions include GDP growth slowing to 1.9% in 2026, the SELIC rate declining from 15.00% to 12.75% by year-end, and inflation moderating to 4.0%.
- —Market Action: The Ibovespa rose approximately 0.5% on Thursday to hover near 182,500, recovering from Wednesday’s sharp 2.1% correction to 181,708. Itaú shares gained nearly 1%. Bradesco (+0.7%) was set to report after the close. Vale fell 1.7% on softer iron ore prices, and Petrobras dipped 0.2% as oil prices declined after the U.S. and Iran agreed to hold talks in Oman.
- —Lula Interview: President Lula sat for an interview with UOL, generating market focus on his comments about minimum wage protections and speculation about Central Bank director appointments. No formal announcements were made, but the timing amid earnings season added a layer of political uncertainty.
- —Porto Seguro Strong: Porto Seguro reported Q4 net profit of R$838.7 million, up 25% year-over-year, reinforcing the trend of solid financial sector earnings.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
Itaú’s results represent the strongest argument for the bull case on Brazil: the country’s dominant private bank is generating returns well above its cost of equity even in a high-rate environment, and management sees a path to continued growth as rates eventually decline. The 72% payout ratio and buyback program signal that capital deployment is being managed conservatively—a positive for foreign allocators concerned about credit quality deterioration.
\n
Wednesday’s 2.1% selloff was the sharpest single-session decline in weeks, driven by profit-taking, Santander’s mixed results, and renewed fiscal concerns. Thursday’s recovery suggests the correction was technical rather than fundamental. The key tension remains: the Ibovespa is up roughly 14% in five weeks, creating elevated expectations that quarterly earnings must continue to meet.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Constructive
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Mexico — Oil-for-Cuba Talks Intensify; Mexico Explores “Humanitarian Aid” Loophole
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —Near-Daily Negotiations: Reuters reported on Thursday, citing four sources familiar with the matter, that high-level Mexican officials are in near-daily talks with Washington to clarify the scope of Trump’s executive order threatening tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba.
- —Humanitarian Classification Strategy: Mexico is considering classifying fuel shipments—potentially including a gasoline tanker—as “humanitarian aid” to avoid triggering U.S. sanctions. Two sources indicated that a dispatch could occur within days if an agreement is reached, alongside food and other supplies.
- —Pemex CEO Defiant: Pemex CEO Victor Rodriguez Padilla stated that Pemex has an ongoing contract with Cuba dating from 2023 and will continue oil shipments “as long as there is crude available,” though actual shipments remain paused since mid-January.
- —Cuba’s Desperation: The UN Secretary-General warned this week that Cuba risks “humanitarian collapse” if it does not receive fuel. Cuba has received less than 85,000 barrels of oil in total since January 1, 2026, compared to the approximately 20,000 barrels per day it was receiving from Mexico through much of 2025.
- —USMCA Leverage: U.S. lawmakers from Florida, led by Representative Carlos Giménez, are explicitly linking Mexico’s Cuba oil policy to the upcoming USMCA trade agreement review, demanding that Mexico halt shipments as a condition of favorable renegotiation terms.
- —Domestic Pressure: Mexico’s ruling Morena party maintains deep ideological and historical ties with Cuba, and President Sheinbaum faces internal coalition pressure not to abandon Havana—creating competing domestic and international political demands.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
The humanitarian aid classification represents Mexico’s most creative diplomatic maneuver yet: by reframing fuel as humanitarian assistance rather than commercial energy supply, Mexico City hopes to find a legal and political space that satisfies both its domestic constituency and avoids triggering the executive order’s tariff mechanisms.
\n
The strategy’s success depends entirely on Washington’s willingness to accept the distinction—a decision that likely rests with Secretary of State Rubio rather than the White House directly.
\n
The USMCA linkage is the more consequential long-term threat. If Cuba becomes a bargaining chip in trade renegotiations, Mexico’s room for maneuver narrows dramatically. Sheinbaum is walking a tightrope: maintaining solidarity with Cuba while protecting the country’s most important trade relationship.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Elevated
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Uruguay — Orsi Wraps Up Shanghai Leg; 19 Agreements Signed Across Visit
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —Shanghai Activities: President Orsi and his approximately 150-person delegation spent Thursday and Friday in Shanghai, the final business leg of the week-long visit, meeting with local authorities, touring port facilities, and participating in trade-and-investment promotion seminars.
- —19 Agreements Signed: Over the course of the trip, Uruguay and China signed 19 cooperation agreements—exceeding earlier reports of “a dozen”—covering investment, industrial cooperation, environment, fishing, poultry, trade, intellectual property, communications, and media cooperation in the Global South.
- —Football Diplomacy: The presence of the president of the Uruguayan Football Association was highlighted as a key feature of the visit, with both sides working to finalize cooperation ahead of the 2030 World Cup.
- —University Partnerships: Uruguay’s Universidad de la República signed agreements with Chinese universities, Huawei, and a Chinese research institute focused on water resources, covering joint labs, student exchanges, and applied AI in health.
- —U.S. Watching Continues: The U.S. embassy official’s earlier warning about China’s “trade practices” and subsidized manufacturing “flooding Uruguay with goods at artificially low prices” hangs over the trip’s aftermath. The unnamed official cited the example of 150 job losses in Uruguay’s toy manufacturing sector attributed to Chinese competition.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
Orsi’s visit has been the most substantive Latin American diplomatic engagement with Beijing since the Maduro capture, and the 19-agreement haul demonstrates that economic reality trumps geopolitical alignment for smaller regional economies.
\n
Uruguay’s triple multilateral chairmanships in 2026 (G77 and China, CELAC, Mercosur) make these relationships operationally significant, not just symbolic.
\n
The U.S. response in the coming weeks will be the real test. Washington has historically tolerated Latin American economic ties with China when they remained commercially focused.
\n
The question is whether the Trump administration’s more assertive posture—particularly in the wake of Panama—extends to pressuring Uruguay on its deepening engagement.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Active
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Colombia — U.S. Reportedly Considering Lifting Petro from Clinton List
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —Sanctions Reassessment: Colombian outlet ColombiOne reported that the United States is considering removing President Petro from the OFAC “Clinton List” (SDN list) as early as mid-2026, following the February 3 White House meeting. While some diplomatic sources confirmed the topic was raised, Colombia’s ambassador in Washington downplayed it as not a central subject of discussion.
- —Election Conditionality: Republican Senator Bernie Moreno, of Colombian origin and present at the Trump-Petro meeting, posted that it is “essential that Colombia guarantee its people transparent, free, and fair elections—not only next month, but also in May and June. The United States will be watching closely.”
- —Concrete Outcomes Still Elusive: Despite the warm atmospherics—including Trump’s “I like you,” “You are great” inscription, and the MAGA hat exchange—no formal agreements were announced on counter-narcotics cooperation, sanctions relief, or Venezuela policy.
- —Market Confidence: The Colombian peso continued to firm and country risk spreads compressed further, extending gains from Tuesday’s summit. The removal of acute bilateral breakdown risk has been the market’s primary takeaway.
- —May Election Implications: Analysts note that the détente’s durability through the March 8 legislative elections and the May 31 presidential vote will determine whether the rapprochement has lasting political effects for Petro’s Historic Pact coalition.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
The potential Clinton List removal would be the most tangible outcome of the summit, with direct personal implications for Petro beyond his term. However, the conditionality signaled by Senator Moreno—linking sanctions relief to electoral integrity—suggests Washington is using the personal sanctions as leverage for broader governance commitments. This creates an implicit bargain: if Colombia delivers clean elections, Petro gets relief; if elections are perceived as manipulated, the sanctions remain.
\n
For markets, the key takeaway remains the removal of tail risk. The bilateral relationship has moved from existential crisis to transactional negotiation, which is unambiguously positive for Colombian assets.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Improved
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Argentina — Markets Shrug Off INDEC Drama; January CPI Awaited Under New Leadership
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —MERVAL Resilience: Argentine equities continue their strong run, with country risk spreads at seven-year lows and the MERVAL up 27.5% over three months. The INDEC leadership change and CPI methodology controversy have had zero discernible impact on asset prices.
- —CPI Methodology Standoff: Economy Minister Caputo’s public justification for shelving the new CPI basket—that it “makes virtually no difference”—contradicts analyst estimates that January inflation under the new weights would have registered approximately 3.0% versus ~2.5% under the old methodology. The 50-basis-point gap matters for the government’s 10.1% annual target for 2026.
- —Extraordinary Sessions: Milei’s priority legislation in extraordinary congressional sessions includes labor reform (reducing employer costs, easing firing rules), lowering the criminal responsibility age, and ratifying the EU-Mercosur agreement. Early progress on any of these would signal legislative coalition management capacity.
- —January CPI Due ~February 10: The first inflation release under new INDEC head Pedro Lines will be closely watched—not for the number itself, which will use the old methodology, but for whether the process is perceived as institutionally independent.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
The market’s indifference to the INDEC episode speaks to a broader truth about the Milei trade: investors are pricing the macro trajectory (declining inflation, fiscal surplus, currency stabilization) rather than institutional quality metrics. This works as long as the trajectory holds. But each episode of perceived interference accumulates as a credibility deficit that will eventually demand a premium—particularly if the disinflation story stalls.
\n
The 2027 midterm elections remain the political anchor. Milei needs inflation credibly below 20% annual by late 2027 to maintain the mandate for further reform. Any change—methodological or otherwise—that complicates that narrative is politically costly regardless of its technical merit.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Watchful
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Chile — Bachelet Campaign Officially Underway; Kast Transition Continues Smoothly
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —Campaign Begins: Following the formal registration of her candidacy with the UN General Assembly on Monday, Bachelet is expected to begin active campaigning immediately, with resources provided through public funds according to Chilean officials.
- —Crowded and Competitive Field: Bachelet faces competition from Rafael Grossi (Argentina/IAEA, backed by Milei), Rebeca Grynspan (Costa Rica/UNCTAD), Ivonne Baki (Ecuador), and potentially Barbados PM Mia Mottley. Spain’s Pedro Sánchez has endorsed the principle of a female secretary-general without naming a specific candidate.
- —Kast’s Calculated Silence: President-elect Kast’s refusal to comment—”I have no reason to say whether what the President of the Republic has done is right or wrong”—continues to keep all options open. His March inauguration will be the decisive moment for the candidacy’s sustainability.
- —Equity Outperformance: Chilean equities remain the world’s best-performing investable market, with the ECH ETF up 36.6% over three months, driven by the orderly political transition and policy reform expectations under Kast.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
Boric’s gambit to lock in the candidacy before leaving office is working in the sense that diplomatic momentum has been created—Brazil and Mexico’s backing makes this a regional initiative rather than merely a Chilean one. But the elephant in the room remains twofold: Kast’s position and Washington’s position.
\n
Bachelet’s criticism of Trump’s immigration policies during her tenure as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights is well-documented, and U.S. support (or non-opposition) in the Security Council is essential.
\n
The market’s extraordinary performance suggests investors are pricing the Kast administration rather than transition risk, treating the UN candidacy as a diplomatic sideshow rather than a source of policy uncertainty.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Watchful
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Peru — Bishops Add Detail to Papal Visit Plans: 5–6 Day Itinerary, March Organizing Commission
\n
\n
\n
\n
What Happened
\n
-
\n \t
- —Duration Confirmed: Bishop Carlos García Camader told Peru’s Andina News Agency that Pope Leo XIV’s visit would last 5–6 days, providing the most specific duration estimate yet.
- —Organizing Commission in March: García Camader announced that the organizing commission for the papal visit will be formed in March, indicating the planning process is moving beyond diplomatic affirmation to operational preparation.
- —Chiclayo Connection: While specific cities have not been confirmed, García Camader noted that “Chiclayo is always in his heart”—referring to Leo XIV’s tenure as bishop in the northern Peruvian city, where he is remembered for hands-on pastoral work including driving to flooded areas and supporting relief efforts.
- —Broader Latin America Itinerary: Vatican sources indicate Leo XIV hopes to visit three Latin American countries—Peru, Argentina, and Uruguay—in either 2026 or 2027. Africa (Angola, Equatorial Guinea, and possibly Cameroon and Algeria) will come first, likely after Easter.
- —300th Anniversary Significance: The visit may coincide with the 300th anniversary of the canonization of Saint Toribio de Mogrovejo, patron saint of the Latin American episcopate, adding ecclesiastical significance to the timing.
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n \t
\n
\n
Why It Matters
\n
The progressive addition of logistical details—duration, organizing commission timeline, city hints—moves the papal visit from “aspirational” to “operational” in planning terms.
\n
For the incoming Peruvian government (elections April 12), the visit represents an extraordinary diplomatic and domestic political asset: a moment of national unity and international visibility that could provide political cover for early policy decisions.
\n
Leo XIV’s deep personal ties to Peru—two decades of missionary work, Peruvian citizenship, and evident emotional connection—make this more than a ceremonial visit. It carries the potential for substantive pastoral and social messaging that could influence Peru’s political discourse.
\n
\n
\n
Risk Level: Stable
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Regional Snapshot
\n
\n
\n
\n
Ecuador
\nThe security crisis persists with approximately 9,000 homicides recorded in 2025. President Noboa’s military-led security strategy continues to face adaptive responses from organized crime networks.
\n
\n
\n
Bolivia
\nDepartmental elections remain scheduled for March 22. Vice President Choquehuanca continues managing the pivot toward multilateral development financing after the $4.5 billion agreement with the World Bank, IMF, and IDB.
\n
\n
\n
Cuba
\nThe humanitarian crisis continues to deepen. Extended blackouts, transportation stoppages, and medical supply shortages persist. Mexico’s near-daily negotiations with Washington on fuel shipments represent Havana’s best near-term hope for energy relief.
\n
\n
\n
Venezuela
\nThe U.S. continues to consolidate its position post-Maduro. Foreign investment opening in the oil sector proceeds. Regional divisions persist between critics of the capture and those offering tacit support.
\n
\n
\n
Costa Rica
\nLaura Fernández of the Social Democratic Progress Party is preparing for her May inauguration following her first-round victory on February 1, promising continuity with the Chaves administration’s pro-U.S. orientation.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Markets at a Glance
\n
\n
\n
\n
| Index / Currency | Level | Daily Change | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ibovespa (Brazil) | ~182,500 | +0.5% | Itaú earnings lift recovery from Wed selloff |
| Chilean Peso | — | Strengthening | +36.6% equity rally since October continues |
| Mexican Peso | — | Under pressure | Cuba oil standoff, USMCA leverage risk |
| Argentine Peso | — | Stable band | MERVAL +27.5% over 3 months, CPI awaited |
| Colombian Peso | — | Firmer | Clinton List removal speculation supportive |
| USD/BRL | ~5.25 | Stable | Firm on rate cut expectations, earnings support |
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
The Week Ahead
\n
\n
\n
\n
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 6 | Orsi Shanghai activities (final day) | U.S. reaction watch |
| Feb 6 | China project freeze fallout (Panama) | Escalation monitoring |
| Feb 7 | Orsi departs China | Trip assessment, U.S. response |
| Feb 8 | Super Bowl LIX | World Cup 2026 visibility spike |
| ~Feb 10 | Argentina January CPI | First release under new INDEC leadership |
| March | Kast inauguration (Chile) | Bachelet candidacy fate |
| March | Peru papal visit organizing commission | Operational planning begins |
| Mar 8 | Colombia legislative elections | Petro coalition test begins |
| Mar 22 | Bolivia departmental elections | Post-socialist governance test |
| Apr 12 | Peru general elections | Pre-papal visit political reset |
| May 8 | Fernández inauguration (Costa Rica) | New government begins |
| May 31 | Colombia presidential election | Petro coalition ultimate test |
\n
\n
Methodology Note
\n
Latin America Pulse is designed for investors, institutions, and global decision-makers tracking the region’s political economy.
\n
\n
\n
Related: Brazil Morning Call | Global Economy Briefing