IBOV 185,147.15 ▼ 0.02% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 64,639.55 ▼ 0.35% MERVAL 3,034,599 ▼ 0.48% COLCAP 2,565.50 ▲ 0.82% BVL PERÚ 59,789.81 ▼ 0.28% USD/BRL5.13▼ 0.03% USD/MXN16.94▲ 0.35% USD/CLP933.48▼ 0.12% USD/COP3,121▼ 0.28% USD/PEN3.35▼ 0.04% USD/ARS1,511▲ 0.15% USD/UYU40.24— 0.00% USD/PYG5,947— 0.00% USD/BOB12.40— 0.00% USD/DOP58.99▼ 0.02% USD/CRC448.67— 0.00% USD/GTQ7.63— 0.00% USD/HNL26.84— 0.00% USD/NIO36.62— 0.00% USD/VES812.65▲ 0.78% USD/PAB1.00— 0.00% USD/BZD2.00— 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD6.71— 0.00% EUR/BRL5.96▲ 0.17% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73% IBOV 185,147.15 ▼ 0.02% IPSA 11,315.26 ▼ 1.14% IPC MEX 64,639.55 ▼ 0.35% MERVAL 3,034,599 ▼ 0.48% COLCAP 2,565.50 ▲ 0.82% BVL PERÚ 59,789.81 ▼ 0.28% USD/BRL 5.16 ▲ 0.01% USD/MXN 17.06 ▼ 0.24% USD/CLP 913.98 ▲ 0.04% USD/COP 3,140 ▲ 0.03% USD/PEN 3.36 ▼ 0.66% USD/ARS 1,493 ▲ 0.10% USD/UYU 40.27 ▲ 1.24% USD/PYG 5,939 ▲ 1.68% USD/BOB 11.64 ▼ 0.76% USD/DOP 58.34 ▲ 1.25% USD/CRC 445.92 ▲ 0.89% USD/GTQ 7.62 ▲ 2.21% USD/HNL 26.79 ▲ 1.57% USD/NIO 36.62 ▲ 0.69% USD/VES 762.44 ▼ 0.13% USD/PAB 1.00 — 0.00% USD/BZD 2.00 — 0.00% USD/JMD 157.28 — 0.00% USD/TTD 6.70 ▲ 0.61% EUR/BRL 5.95 ▲ 1.01% BRENT 88.88 ▼ 0.03% WTI 83.11 ▼ 0.11% IRON ORE 161.91 — — COPPER 6.61 ▲ 0.03% GOLD 4,461 ▲ 1.78% SILVER 65.59 ▲ 1.26% SOY 1,184 ▲ 3.20% CORN 480.50 ▲ 10.02% WHEAT 655.00 ▲ 3.93% COFFEE 317.25 ▼ 5.51% SUGAR 16.43 ▼ 1.79% ORANGE JUICE 138.55 ▼ 0.47% COTTON 85.03 ▲ 2.33% COCOA 5,719 ▲ 3.18% BEEF 223.60 ▼ 3.93% CATTLE 339.10 ▼ 3.16% LITHIUM 75.20 ▲ 1.47% PETR4 41.64 ▼ 0.05% VALE3 72.97 ▲ 0.83% ITUB4 38.60 ▼ 1.03% BBDC4 16.85 ▲ 0.36% ABEV3 14.89 ▼ 0.80% BBAS3 19.37 ▲ 0.47% B3SA3 14.26 ▼ 0.21% WEGE3 47.59 ▲ 0.49% PRIO3 59.14 ▼ 0.19% SUZB3 41.33 ▲ 2.35% RENT3 34.68 ▼ 0.09% AZZA3 15.89 ▼ 2.63% CSAN3 3.22 ▼ 1.83% RAIZ4 0.25 — 0.00% PCAR3 2.75 ▼ 0.36% GMAT3 3.65 ▼ 1.08% PSSA3 48.13 ▼ 0.54% CVCB3 1.33 ▼ 2.92% POSI3 3.36 ▲ 2.44% SLCE3 13.34 ▲ 0.30% NATU3 8.14 ▼ 0.73%
since 2009
Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Brazil Politics - Brazil

Brazil’s Social Media Regulation: Congress vs. Courts

By · January 27, 2025 · 2 min read

Daily Brief

The morning intel from across Latin America. Free.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your email.

Brazil faces a critical juncture in its approach to social media regulation. The country’s Supreme Court and Attorney General’s Office have taken steps to address the issue, while Congress remains notably silent.

The debate intensified after Mark Zuckerberg announced the end of fact-checking services for Meta‘s platforms in the United States. This decision prompted Brazilian authorities to scrutinize the potential impact on their jurisdiction.

RT
Ask Rio Times
This story and the bigger picture.
Open the full Ask Rio Times →
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
Browse the directory →

Legal experts argue that Congress, not the judiciary, should lead the creation of new rules for social media platforms. They emphasize the need for a balanced approach that protects free speech while effectively combating digital crimes.

Brazil’s current internet legislation, the Marco Civil from 2014, fails to address newer challenges like artificial intelligence and mass disinformation campaigns. Specialists suggest building upon this foundation to create more specific regulations.

The Supreme Court is set to rule on two cases that could increase platforms’ liability for user-generated content. However, experts warn that court-led regulation lacks the legitimacy of legislative action.

[arve url=”https://www.riotimesonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/67975ffa8183c046621fffca.mp4″ loop=”true” autoplay=”true” /]

Specialists stress the importance of “surgical precision” in crafting these regulations. They propose measures such as requiring platforms to justify content removal and creating user appeal channels. Transparency in moderation criteria is also deemed crucial.

The goal is to avoid both state censorship and unchecked platform power. A well-crafted regulation would prevent partisan misuse and overzealous content removal by platforms, while maintaining individual freedoms.

As Brazil navigates this complex issue, its approach could set a precedent for other nations grappling with similar challenges in the digital age.

This article was produced by The Rio Times’ automated newsroom system. How we use AI · Report an error

Read More from The Rio Times

The Rio Times · Power Map
See who really holds power in Latin America
Click to open the Power Map

Rotate for Best Experience

This report is optimized for landscape viewing. Rotate your phone for the full experience.